Special Counsel Mueller Impanels Washington Grand Jury in Russia Probe
Source: Wall Street Journal
Expansion beyond Flynn grand jury is a sign the investigation in election meddling is ramping up
By Del Quentin Wilber and
Byron Tau
Aug. 3, 2017 3:24 p.m. ET
Special Counsel Robert Mueller has impaneled a grand jury in Washington to investigate Russias interference in the 2016 elections, a sign that his inquiry is growing in intensity and entering a new phase, according to two people familiar with the matter.
The grand jury, which began its work in recent weeks, is a sign that Mr. Muellers inquiry is ramping up and that it will likely continue for months. Mr. Mueller is investigating Russias efforts to influence the 2016 election and whether President Donald Trumps campaign or associates colluded with the Kremlin as part of that effort.
A spokesman for Mr. Mueller, Joshua Stueve, declined to comment. Moscow has denied seeking to influence the election, and Mr. Trump has vigorously disputed allegations of collusion. The president has called Mr. Muellers inquiry a witch hunt.
Ty Cobb, special counsel to the president, said he wasnt aware that Mr. Mueller had started using a new grand jury. Grand jury matters are typically secret, Mr. Cobb said. The White House favors anything that accelerates the conclusion of his work fairly.
The White House is committed to fully cooperating with Mr. Mueller.
Read more: https://www.wsj.com/articles/special-counsel-mueller-impanels-washington-grand-jury-in-russia-probe-1501788287?mod=e2tw
Laf.La.Dem.
(2,947 posts)brush
(53,971 posts)The one thing trump is good at is distraction.
Mueller will go on with his grand jury though, orange one.
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)The GJ hears the evidence and makes a finding. That means the investigation on that point is almost done, or done. ??
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)And in a complex case like this, presenting evidence can take months.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)then. That makes sense.
I've only ever heard of Grand Juries hearing evidence & testimony & then deciding whether the evidence is sufficient for people to be indicted. That GJ hearing is at the end of an investigation.
wishstar
(5,272 posts)This means all of Trump's people will be required to testify and can't decline to appear to give testimony under oath
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)and has the evidence filed and stamped and ready...so that each witness can be questioned on the pertinent evidence.
But what another poster is saying that hte GJ is being impaneled for the purpose of issuing subpoenas, which would possibly be done during an investigation, it seems?
Could be the investigation is not that far along, but is on one issue only. There are other issues.
Mueller just hired someone new, which he wouldn't have done if he were ready to go to the GJ on everything.
procon
(15,805 posts)Matthew28
(1,798 posts)Trumps a crook and a snake. He must be covered up to his eyes in criminal activity.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)He just hired someone new. ???
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)I guess that's true. This surprised me.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)all laid out before the schmuck fired him.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Trump was/is involved a lot of different things.
You might remember that there are/were a lot of different USA agencies that were looking into different
issues about Trump, like Treasury Dept. Some of those investigations were turned over to Mueller, so he could see the big picture.
More info has come from foreign countries who had surveillance going on .
A lot of players willing to join together, on a global scale, that should make him feel special.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Gothmog
(145,817 posts)Solly Mack
(90,799 posts)Good.
SpankMe
(2,972 posts)Oh, please!!!!
Leghorn21
(13,527 posts)jpak
(41,760 posts)Calista241
(5,586 posts)Trump can't be prosecuted until he's out of office. He's after someone else, and Mueller better hope all those jurers keep quiet lest Trump exercise the power of the Presidential Pardon.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)any witness he calls to testify can.
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)Legal scholars are divided and no court has ever ruled on the issue. If I were Mueller and I had the evidence, I would indict Trump and let the courts decide.
politicat
(9,808 posts)Thanks to Ken Starr, there's a DOJ memo that makes the case that an indictment of a sitting president is possible. Of course, that attempt itself will put a lot of lawyers to work.
This is clearly a jobs program -- full employment for all the lawyers. (In fact, there's been an excess supply of lawyers since 2009-10ish.)
PubliusEnigma
(1,583 posts)mackdaddy
(1,530 posts)Impeachment is just another kind of indictment, and if the charges are solid enough even the Republicans in congress would have to do something.
politicat
(9,808 posts)I know that I'm unlikely to ever be impaneled on a regular jury because I'm a scientist with direct experience and research into memory and behavior, therefore I bring knowledge into the jury box beyond what is presented. I know several people who have been client, prisoner and patient advocates who don't make it onto juries for similar reasons. And people who follow the papers closely (or true crime afficianados) are also often excused/excluded.
Given the profile of this matter, if that's the standard, impaneling the GJ could be difficult. Is there a different standard for GJs in this district?
mobeau69
(11,167 posts)THE GRAND JURY POOL
The pool of potential grand jurors includes all persons living in the community under the court's jurisdiction. The court randomly chooses grand juror candidates from among this pool. The clerk of courts identifies candidates from public records such as registered voters and licensed drivers.
ELIGIBILITY
U.S. law requires that everyone selected for federal grand jury duty be U.S. citizens over the age of 18, and having lived within the court's judicial district for at least one year. Jurors must be sufficiently fluent in the English language to complete the court's selection questionnaire and have no pending felony charges or felony convictions on their records. They also must have no physical or mental disabilities making them unable to serve.
SELECTION
To determine the eligibility of prospective jurors, the clerk of the court sends each a mandatory questionnaire to complete and return. The court then randomly selects grand jurors from among the candidates eligible to serve according to their questionnaire answers. Each selected juror receives a summons to appear for jury duty at the courthouse on the scheduled date and time.
EXEMPTIONS
Selected jurors may request an exemption from serving on the grand jury under certain conditions. Courts generally excuse jurors in public safely professions (such as police or nurses), and those over a certain age if they request it. Additionally, courts may excuse others from duty if their service would create an "undue hardship or extreme inconvenience." This includes someone who is the sole caregiver for a disabled family member, someone without the means to reach the courthouse, or someone scheduled for surgery in the immediate future.
TERMS OF SERVICE
Grand jurors generally must serve one or two days each week for anywhere from 12 to 24 months, depending on the type of grand jury--county, state or federal. Fortunately for those chosen, citizens need not serve on more than one grand jury, or serve as both a grand and petit juror, within any two-year period.
politicat
(9,808 posts)But in a regular jury, both prosecutor and defense have the right to object to specific jurors, either for cause (a juror who is a close relative of an unrelated murder victim is unlikely to be able to be impartial in a murder case) or peremptory (the attorney is not required to state a cause.) Both sides get a number of peremptories in most jury cases.
A grand jury, however, does not have a defense, and given the secrecy in which GJs work, it would be a breach of security to ask questions before impaneling.
So thanks, but that's not the question I was asking.
BumRushDaShow
(129,911 posts)Just heard on the radio.
mobeau69
(11,167 posts)Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)who have sold out America to freaking russia.
George II
(67,782 posts)Skittles
(153,262 posts)it is so much more serious than that
Pachamama
(16,887 posts)Even "conspiring to subvert an election" is probably more accurate than the word "meddling".
But I think the crimes associated include, money laundering, sharing classified information, and much more
adigal
(7,581 posts)Then Pence pardons him.
He will forget, as usual, about NY's Atty General who is also on the hunt, and Pence can't pardon state crimes.
With his corrupt business history, Trump should NEVER HAVE run for any office, even dogcatcher.
procon
(15,805 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,464 posts)He's going to dispute anything where he doesn't WIN!
Just like the election.
Cognitive_Resonance
(1,546 posts)Cadfael
(1,301 posts)Please please make more statements that can be investigated! Open mouth, insert foot, kiss butt goodbye.....we dare you!
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)As the scope changes and more people are targets, more grand juries may be convened. This is a complicated investigation, expect more of them.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
nycbos
(6,042 posts)mopinko
(70,314 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)is sweating this out right about now.