Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,974 posts)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:46 PM Jul 2012

Scranton, Penn. to pay back workers' wages, plus interest

Source: Reuters

Mon Jul 30, 2012 1:55pm EDT

(Reuters) - After slashing public employees' pay to minimum wage on July 6, the mayor of cash-poor Scranton, Pennsylvania, has struck a deal to pay them back what they are owed with interest.

Mayor Christopher Doherty agreed that the city would pay approximately $750,000 in compensation owed to firefighters, police officers and public works employees, plus at least $5,100 in interest, said Tom Jennings, a lawyer for the employees' unions.

In exchange, the unions said they would drop their bid to have the mayor held in contempt of court, according to the agreement, reached Saturday and presented to a judge on Monday.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]

Doherty made headlines around the world after cutting employees' pay to the state's $7.25 minimum wage for the July 6 payroll period.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/30/us-usa-scranton-payroll-idUSBRE86T0WR20120730

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Scranton, Penn. to pay back workers' wages, plus interest (Original Post) Eugene Jul 2012 OP
It's still messed up . . . markpkessinger Jul 2012 #1
And yet it's what the city offered to start with. Igel Jul 2012 #3
This is part of a fight between the Mayor and City Council happyslug Jul 2012 #2

Igel

(35,383 posts)
3. And yet it's what the city offered to start with.
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 11:40 PM
Jul 2012

So it was a good faith offer, and the best the employees could hope for.

Can't get blood out of a turnip. The option was this or emergency lay-offs for everybody. This way at least they get work out of the employees to keep that all-important public sector functioning while the employees have at least a promise of income. Since it's now in writing, that makes it legally binding. Silly of the union not to get it in writing asap.

Of course, I guess if they were laid off they'd get unemployment, so there's that drawback.

California's done this kind of thing numerous times. No money in the coffers, issue IOUs--de facto scrip--and hope it sticks. It did. Often wondered if it infringed on Congress' right to coin money. Some lenders and banks took the de facto scrip at nominal face value and held it as a kind of interest-free loan to the state employee/state until the money flowed again.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Scranton, Penn. to pay ba...