Trump lawyer 'not going to speculate' on whether president might fire special counsel
Source: 6ABC Philadelphia
A member of President Trump's personal legal team said he is "not going to speculate" on whether the president may order the firing of the special counsel investigating Russia's meddling in the 2016 election and its possible ties to Trump associates.
But lawyer Jay Sekulow added that he "can't imagine the issue is going to arise."
"I'm not going to speculate on what [Trump] will or will not do" with regard to Robert Mueller, the special counsel leading the FBI's Russia probe, Sekulow told ABC News Chief Anchor George Stephanopoulos in an exclusive interview on "This Week" Sunday.
"Right now the role of the president is to govern the United States of America. He's going to do that. He's going to leave anything else to the lawyers. But I can't imagine that that issue is going to arise" with Mueller, said Sekulow.
Read more: http://6abc.com/news/trump-lawyer-not-going-to-speculate-on-whether-president-might-fire-special-counsel/2083997/
More at link. The country and some of the Congress wouldn't tolerate firing Special
Prosecutor Mueller, but Don has a tin ear to what will fly in politics.
FarPoint
(12,317 posts)How much more America?
cstanleytech
(26,280 posts)Why? Because there are still millions of die hard supporters rooting for him and changing there minds will be difficult at the very least and in the case of some impossible even if he went on national television and confessed.
FarPoint
(12,317 posts)Cult level fundamentalist....they are reinforced by the 24/7 fox noise talking points of propaganda...I don't think we can deprogram them...
Stryst
(714 posts)When we visited family in central Texas last year, we both noticed that no one in the Texas branch of the family had internet access other than some really bad cell phone access. A small TV antenna that gave them a half dozen scratchy channels... but radio came in crystal clear. So everyone listened to radio a lot more than I had seen growing up in a large city in Washington.
The Right knew what they were doing by taking over all the radio stations; it's the most effective tool in their box for keeping their supporters beating the war drums against "liberals".
FarPoint
(12,317 posts)You know, the rural residents believe they have the information... basically good people with successful brain washed thinking...I really don't know how to fix it other than the return of fair media.. I have now forgotten the media rule that use to regulate this...well it sure did hurt us all.
UpInArms
(51,280 posts)Thanks to Raygun, our fellow country peeps have become propagandized
Sigh
FarPoint
(12,317 posts)That's it!
BumRushDaShow
(128,768 posts)torpedoed by Raygun.... and no one on our side can even lobby to get it back without getting an avalanche of political bombardment and abject hatred for even considering it.
lark
(23,083 posts)No consequences for the rich is a common refrain among all rw'ers, so he truly sees no consequences as long as he throws an occasional bone to the tealiban. Putin and he are counting on that to get their way.
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)He has worked Trump a long time. He has probably.seen Trump sabotage himself before.
mulsh
(2,959 posts)regulations. No disrespek (sic) Sure they may know how to beat mid level DA's and can even go toe to to with some fed criminal prosecutors, as long as the feds aren't really trying. But now they're playing in much higher judicial levels. I doubt the kind of lawyer willing to join Trump's personal tam can even breather the oxygen at that level.
On the other hand they all have nicer suits than their client so there's that.
just saying'
jpak
(41,757 posts)yup
Me.
(35,454 posts)SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Trump can order Rosenstein to fire Mueller or if Rosenstein recuses himself, Trump can order whoever replaces Rosenstein at DOJ fire Mueller since that person works under Trump.
However, Rosenstein can change the wording of his order appointing Mueller to make him truly independent, i.e. not firable by Rosenstein/Trump. That is what Senator Kamala Harris was trying to get Rosenstein to agree to do when he testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee this week--when she was hushed by Chairman Burr:
Rosenstein's squirreliness in the above exchange made it clear he does not want to make such a change, which is why Harris concluded, "I'll take that as a no."
George II
(67,782 posts)beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)pecosbob
(7,534 posts)that broke the camel's back.