Democrats call for law on presidential candidate tax returns
Source: LA Times
By Morgan Little
July 18, 2012, 12:50 p.m.
WASHINGTON -- A pair of congressional brothers sought Wednesday to rally support for greater transparency among presidential candidates, particularly in regard to the hot topic around Washington this week tax returns.
Rep. Sander Levin (D-Mich.), ranking member of the Ways and Means Committee, announced he is preparing legislation to amend 1978s Ethics and Government Act to mandate that all presidential candidates release at least 10 years of tax returns. As it stands now, its up to each candidate how much of their financial history they wish to disclose, a standard that Levin says is insufficient, particularly in regard to the disclosure of offshore accounts, compensatory arrangements and the details of capital gains income.
As with anything in Washington, the legislation has more than a little to do with the current presidential campaign, as Democrats have been hammering Republican Mitt Romney to release more than the single tax return he has thus far made public.
While making clear that he thinks Romney should release his past returns, Sander Levin said the matter is not a question of disqualification, but of information, citing the need for candidates to not only provide their tax returns, but to do so in a way that allows the average American to understand them.
Read more: http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-democrats-call-for-legislation-action-on-presidential-tax-returns-20120718,0,4608989.story
aquart
(69,014 posts)Robb
(39,665 posts)Well put!
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Andy823
(11,495 posts)Once again it will make republicans vote on something they do not want, transparency! Getting them on record is always a good idea, especially in an election year!
Swede Atlanta
(3,596 posts)The Constitution sets forth the requirements to run for President. I think any attempt to add any additional requirement, however reasonable and appropriate, is unconstitutional on its face.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)mountain grammy
(26,666 posts)Which could be a short addition to the amendment to override "citizens united." movetoamend.org
Robb
(39,665 posts)myrna minx
(22,772 posts)Constitutionality didn't stop all of the huffing, puffing and bloviating about that crazy topic that only rabid conspiracy theorists wailed about. Do you think the American People would be interested in seeing where Mittens has hidden all of his money or what he has chosen to to with it? Yes. Yes I do.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Hope the media picks it up and discusses it.
It will never happen, but would be a great thing to discuss.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)So this is the answer for that.
Frances
(8,548 posts)something to do with sex after Clinton's scandal with Monica?
Response to eppur_se_muova (Original post)
Post removed