Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eppur_se_muova

(36,317 posts)
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 04:42 PM Jul 2012

Democrats call for law on presidential candidate tax returns

Source: LA Times

By Morgan Little

July 18, 2012, 12:50 p.m.
WASHINGTON -- A pair of congressional brothers sought Wednesday to rally support for greater transparency among presidential candidates, particularly in regard to the hot topic around Washington this week – tax returns.

Rep. Sander Levin (D-Mich.), ranking member of the Ways and Means Committee, announced he is preparing legislation to amend 1978’s Ethics and Government Act to mandate that all presidential candidates release at least 10 years of tax returns. As it stands now, it’s up to each candidate how much of their financial history they wish to disclose, a standard that Levin says is insufficient, particularly in regard to the disclosure of offshore accounts, compensatory arrangements and the details of capital gains income.

As with anything in Washington, the legislation has more than a little to do with the current presidential campaign, as Democrats have been hammering Republican Mitt Romney to release more than the single tax return he has thus far made public.

While making clear that he thinks Romney should release his past returns, Sander Levin said the matter is “not a question of disqualification, but of information,” citing the need for candidates to not only provide their tax returns, but to do so in a way that allows the average American to understand them.


Read more: http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-democrats-call-for-legislation-action-on-presidential-tax-returns-20120718,0,4608989.story

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
3. It's a great idea
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 05:07 PM
Jul 2012

Once again it will make republicans vote on something they do not want, transparency! Getting them on record is always a good idea, especially in an election year!

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
4. Unconstitutional on its face......
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 05:18 PM
Jul 2012

The Constitution sets forth the requirements to run for President. I think any attempt to add any additional requirement, however reasonable and appropriate, is unconstitutional on its face.

mountain grammy

(26,666 posts)
7. Yes, new requirements should be a Constitutional amendment.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 05:31 PM
Jul 2012

Which could be a short addition to the amendment to override "citizens united." movetoamend.org

myrna minx

(22,772 posts)
11. Did that stop the baggers from howling to make showing a birth certificate mandatory?
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 05:43 PM
Jul 2012

Constitutionality didn't stop all of the huffing, puffing and bloviating about that crazy topic that only rabid conspiracy theorists wailed about. Do you think the American People would be interested in seeing where Mittens has hidden all of his money or what he has chosen to to with it? Yes. Yes I do.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
12. Its a nice finger in the eye of the GOP.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 05:44 PM
Jul 2012

Hope the media picks it up and discusses it.

It will never happen, but would be a great thing to discuss.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
14. Mitt proposed a requirment that a President should have business experience
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 06:19 PM
Jul 2012

So this is the answer for that.

Frances

(8,548 posts)
8. Didn't the Republicans want to have some kind of requirement concerning
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 05:42 PM
Jul 2012

something to do with sex after Clinton's scandal with Monica?

Response to eppur_se_muova (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Democrats call for law on...