Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,073 posts)
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 12:01 AM Jul 2012

White House weakened EPA soot proposal, documents show

Source: Washington Post

The White House recently modified an Environmental Protection Agency proposal to limit soot emissions, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post, inviting public comment on a slightly weaker standard than the agency had originally sought.

The behind-the-scenes tweaking of the proposed soot standards, which affect particles measuring less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter, sparked criticism that the White House was interfering with science-based decisions.

Fine particles, which come from oil refineries, factories and other operations, rank among the most deadly widespread air pollutants. EPA had originally wanted to tighten the annual exposure to fine-particle soot from 15 micrograms per cubic meter of air to 12 micrograms per cubic meter, according to an e-mail between Office of Management and Budget and EPA officials.

But OMB directed the EPA to make the limit between 12 and 13 micrograms per cubic meter of air.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/white-house-weakened-epa-soot-proposal-documents-show/2012/07/17/gJQANH3yrW_story.html

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House weakened EPA soot proposal, documents show (Original Post) alp227 Jul 2012 OP
typical nt. limpyhobbler Jul 2012 #1
Who would have thought? AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #2
“If this had been a Bush administration move, every progressive in America would be screaming foul" Wilms Jul 2012 #3
Absolutely! intheflow Jul 2012 #4
Some of us scream foul, but then are told by much more knowledgeable DUers that we just don't progressoid Jul 2012 #6
We are admonished every day to believe that War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength, woo me with science Jul 2012 #8
Damn straight. Hell Hath No Fury Jul 2012 #14
Surprise (cough), surprise (cough, cough), surprise (cough,cough, cough)... hay rick Jul 2012 #5
Every day. Every damned day there is a new one. woo me with science Jul 2012 #7
We're too busy focusing emilyg Jul 2012 #9
Well, maybe Obama will turn into a democrat in his second term. PSPS Jul 2012 #10
I Doubt it PSPS bonniebgood Jul 2012 #13
K & R dipsydoodle Jul 2012 #11
Article links to itself??? BESIDES the OMB is the ONLY WAY to cost it. Festivito Jul 2012 #12
 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
3. “If this had been a Bush administration move, every progressive in America would be screaming foul"
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 12:23 AM
Jul 2012
Frank O’Donnell, who heads the advocacy group Clean Air Watch, cited the change as “the latest in a pattern of interference by the White House in decisions that rightly belong to EPA, based on science.” Last year President Obama pulled an EPA proposal to impose stricter limits on smog-forming ozone on the grounds that it would be costly and the rules were up for review again starting in 2013.

“If this had been a Bush administration move, every progressive in America would be screaming foul,” O’Donnell added.



progressoid

(50,011 posts)
6. Some of us scream foul, but then are told by much more knowledgeable DUers that we just don't
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 12:52 AM
Jul 2012

understand the nuances of governance. Or that the administration is playing super mega 7 dimensional chess. Or we didn't get our pony. Or that he has a 99.628% approval rating among liberal so....

etc.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
8. We are admonished every day to believe that War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength,
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 01:00 AM
Jul 2012

the chocolate ration has been increased, ...and we still have representation.

The denial has to stop.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=146626

 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
14. Damn straight.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 11:36 AM
Jul 2012

Some of us continue to scream bloody murder, regardless of the letter after the name -- I'm no hypocrite.

hay rick

(7,662 posts)
5. Surprise (cough), surprise (cough, cough), surprise (cough,cough, cough)...
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 12:50 AM
Jul 2012

cough, cough, cough, cough, cough.

bonniebgood

(943 posts)
13. I Doubt it PSPS
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 10:37 AM
Jul 2012

There's more: Both parties work for the same corporate masters.. Our President is still appointing repigs to major position in Government.

http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/12/03/president-obama-names-republican-tony-hammond-to-postal-regulatory-commission/

George W. "i was powerful" Bush appointments were ALL repigs.

http://www.savethepostoffice.com/sites/default/files/Board%20of%20Governors%20Brief%20Background.pdf
The two top pigs of the Post office Board also sits on the CCA, private prisons Board. Stock $30.29.

If links don't work, take a peak at: www.savethepostoffice.com to see how the post office
and all those union jobs, people lives, veterans jobs, and the Constitution are being destroyed
for NO reason, has NOTHING to do with the budget or deficit.

Ed and Rachel are smart, i have emailed them, they won't even mention the Postal Service "Board of REPIG Governors" thats destroying, the fabric of our Country, our Government from within to benefit the 1%.
The NALC ( National Association of Letters Carriers) begged Obama not to appoint the repig, he did
not listen.
I believe all this Romney Drama is planned to keep the drones fighting each other, a ruse to appoint JEB at their convention. It's all a scam folks, Both parties work for the same corporate masters.
My vote doesn't count where i live. If I lived in a swing State, yes I would be voting for Obama. Since I dont, I don't have to. But I WILL Vote.

Festivito

(13,452 posts)
12. Article links to itself??? BESIDES the OMB is the ONLY WAY to cost it.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 06:45 AM
Jul 2012

The article does not point to where it claims to point:

according to documents obtained by The Washington Post

Does not point to documents, instead points back to the same document being read!

lightly weaker standard than the agency had originally sought.

Points back to the same article being read again!

BESIDES, isn't the EPA under some restriction to NOT use cost of implementing, therefore having to defer that portion of its work to the OMB, Office of Management and Budget?

Rather than being "behind-the-scenes" it seems even more open.

I'd prefer that the EPA incorporate cost into its decision and report it, but, some bonehead in Congress passed a strange rule. Wonder which publicans, er, ah, party did that.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»White House weakened EPA ...