Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 04:09 PM Sep 2016

U.S. owes black people reparations for a history of ‘racial terrorism,’ says U.N. panel

Source: Washington Post

The history of slavery in the United States justifies reparations for African Americans, argues a recent report by a U.N.-affiliated group based in Geneva.

This conclusion was part of a study by the United Nations' Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent, a body that reports to the international organization's High Commissioner on Human Rights. The group of experts, which includes leading human rights lawyers from around the world, presented its findings to the United Nations Human Rights Council on Monday, pointing to the continuing link between present injustices and the dark chapters of American history.

"In particular, the legacy of colonial history, enslavement, racial subordination and segregation, racial terrorism and racial inequality in the United States remains a serious challenge, as there has been no real commitment to reparations and to truth and reconciliation for people of African descent," the report stated. "Contemporary police killings and the trauma that they create are reminiscent of the past racial terror of lynching."

The panel drew its recommendations, which are nonbinding and unlikely to influence Washington, after a fact-finding mission in the United States in January. At the time, it hailed the strides taken to make the American criminal justice system more equitable but pointed to the corrosive legacy of the past.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/09/27/u-s-owes-black-people-reparations-for-a-history-of-racial-terrorism-says-u-n-panel/

110 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. owes black people reparations for a history of ‘racial terrorism,’ says U.N. panel (Original Post) NWCorona Sep 2016 OP
Disagree. LiberalFighter Sep 2016 #1
Significant harm through past discrimination cannot be cured merely by the elimination of the... xocet Sep 2016 #4
It's certainly not my primary but it's an option. I am hearing a lot of Missn-Hitch Sep 2016 #24
supervised by the UN DustyJoe Sep 2016 #103
That is obvious. Native Americans should also be given significant reparations. n/t xocet Sep 2016 #2
If you honestly believed that, then you'd be paying them Taitertots Sep 2016 #7
I just read your other post. xocet Sep 2016 #12
None of those are free. Are you going to give up your prosperity? Taitertots Sep 2016 #18
"None of those are free." What is the price of a "formal apology" these days? xocet Sep 2016 #22
What is the apology for? Racial collective guilt is racism Taitertots Sep 2016 #27
As noted before, you assume a lot in your reading (or casual perusal) of articles and replies. xocet Sep 2016 #47
This is professional level disingenuous behavior Taitertots Sep 2016 #79
What do you mean by prosperity? Missn-Hitch Sep 2016 #25
Let's do that and not have it racially exclusionary (reparations) Taitertots Sep 2016 #36
How about a slice of the hughly bloated military budget go to college education . . . brush Sep 2016 #28
Why would any of those policies need to be racially exclusionary Taitertots Sep 2016 #35
Sure, do progressive things for everyone but we've swept hundreds of years . . . brush Sep 2016 #38
Perhaps this is the cynic in me talking, but... Sand Rat Expat Sep 2016 #39
I said early on there should be no payments to individuals brush Sep 2016 #40
Just pointing out that, people being people, I doubt everyone will hug it out afterward. NT Sand Rat Expat Sep 2016 #41
Hugs are overrated. Amends for historical racism and cruelty rate much higher. brush Sep 2016 #42
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2016 #51
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2016 #52
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2016 #53
I guess it's because it was black people (not white people) kept as slaves, DUH! anniebelle Sep 2016 #63
Wow. narnian60 Sep 2016 #64
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2016 #65
Welcome to DU for your short miserable stay. Lochloosa Sep 2016 #66
Well, sorry they removed that typical racist's remark so soon. I had some facts for him. anniebelle Sep 2016 #67
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2016 #69
+100 sarae Sep 2016 #77
Sounds like you're filled with racial animus Taitertots Sep 2016 #78
You need a history lesson about slavery, obviously. anniebelle Sep 2016 #80
Already knew that. Still doesn't justify institutional racism (reparations) Taitertots Sep 2016 #83
You obviously did not read the title of the post I was responding to. anniebelle Sep 2016 #102
I read it. Your heart is filled with hatred. Taitertots Sep 2016 #104
I love this post. brush Sep 2016 #85
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2016 #55
Well, then let's find all the former slaves still living... TCJ70 Sep 2016 #3
Yes, we'll just take it out of our individual inheritances. nt Dreamer Tatum Sep 2016 #6
Formerly enslaved people of course are not still living (but you knew that). Their descendants . . . brush Sep 2016 #84
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2016 #88
Racial collective guilt is racism Taitertots Sep 2016 #5
You are on the wrong side of history Wednesdays Sep 2016 #14
Your defense of racism puts you on the wrong side of history Taitertots Sep 2016 #15
Let's race. 1 mile. I get 1/2 mile head start. Missn-Hitch Sep 2016 #26
When our great grand kids race, will your's need that same advantage? Taitertots Sep 2016 #33
FYI: "...will your's (sic) need...?" n/t xocet Sep 2016 #45
Respectfully. So you do admit that inequality exists present day? Missn-Hitch Sep 2016 #101
I'm worried about inequity. Taitertots Sep 2016 #106
I guess it's too bad Abe didn't nip this in the bud. He was way too nice. Cheers. Missn-Hitch Sep 2016 #108
That is awoke_in_2003 Sep 2016 #32
You're saying that like it's a bad thing Taitertots Sep 2016 #34
Oh snap GummyBearz Sep 2016 #37
How did my privilege get checked? awoke_in_2003 Sep 2016 #43
By that logic melman Sep 2016 #46
Don't worry about it GummyBearz Sep 2016 #95
Thanks for the reply awoke_in_2003 Sep 2016 #99
The entire concept of collective guilt is horrific. Xithras Sep 2016 #100
Maybe the UN should be more concerned with its "rape for food" programs NobodyHere Sep 2016 #8
This is a huge issue within our community Coolest Ranger Sep 2016 #9
I'd be happy with the 40 acres JustAnotherGen Sep 2016 #30
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2016 #54
Reparations is a stupid concept. Archae Sep 2016 #10
You might want to reread the article. It does not say what you seem to think that it says. n/t xocet Sep 2016 #13
A visceral reaction to the word, 'reparations'. ronnie624 Sep 2016 #19
Because people don't want to shell out a bunch of money christx30 Sep 2016 #81
If you had a little more knowledge you'd know it isn't stupid and there is a precedent brush Sep 2016 #29
Obama would get nothing, because his ancestors were never enslaved. AngryAmish Sep 2016 #73
It is so easy... awoke_in_2003 Sep 2016 #11
I bet if I wrote: EX500rider Sep 2016 #20
I am white, BTW awoke_in_2003 Sep 2016 #21
Point still stands. EX500rider Sep 2016 #23
Of course melman Sep 2016 #31
And right wing. Starry Messenger Sep 2016 #61
it really is Coolest Ranger Sep 2016 #71
"The dangerous ideology of white supremacy ronnie624 Sep 2016 #16
The OP is the final report from that committee BumRushDaShow Sep 2016 #17
What about reparations for women? Buckeye_Democrat Sep 2016 #44
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2016 #48
^---- warning. Trigger alert on above post. n/t CincyDem Sep 2016 #58
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2016 #59
Post removed Post removed Sep 2016 #49
Post removed Post removed Sep 2016 #50
this won't take long. lol CincyDem Sep 2016 #56
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2016 #57
K & R malaise Sep 2016 #60
America loves to blame their black population for it's suffering as if it's deserved. Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2016 #62
Don't you know Coolest Ranger Sep 2016 #74
Perhaps those reparations could be paid by the current slaveholders in saudi arabia RaymondLuxuryYacht Sep 2016 #68
One flaw in your argument...we are the "Greatest County on Earth" remember. Lochloosa Sep 2016 #70
The indigenous population too polynomial Sep 2016 #90
reparations! retrowire Sep 2016 #72
Reparations, IMO to avoid many of the things you mention, should not be in the form of . . . brush Sep 2016 #89
hmm that does sound more feasible. nt retrowire Sep 2016 #91
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2016 #92
This is a great topic for discussion. LWolf Sep 2016 #75
So LWolf Sep 2016 #76
According to a lot of people, ronnie624 Sep 2016 #82
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2016 #87
According to a lot of LWolf Sep 2016 #107
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2016 #86
A lot of messages deleted and names removed on this thread oberliner Sep 2016 #93
Practically the entire continent of Africa is owed reparations. ronnie624 Sep 2016 #94
I can appreciate the concept of reparations. IMO, if they were to happen KittyWampus Sep 2016 #96
+1 ronnie624 Sep 2016 #97
How would it work? I mean, which "black people" would qualify? Quantess Sep 2016 #98
How much equals respect? n/t jtuck004 Sep 2016 #105
When reports like this come out... Row_the_boat Sep 2016 #109
The racists run in here to keep us Negroes in our place. Typical. Liberal_Stalwart71 Sep 2016 #110

LiberalFighter

(50,928 posts)
1. Disagree.
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 04:20 PM
Sep 2016

There needs to be major changes that equalizes for everyone. Maybe require more serious penalties or other remedies for those that continue to discriminate. I couldn't include my primary suggestion as it involves bodily harm.

xocet

(3,871 posts)
4. Significant harm through past discrimination cannot be cured merely by the elimination of the...
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 04:46 PM
Sep 2016

discrimination of the present as the elimination of present discrimination only prevents future harm from occurring.

Yes, equality and social justice need to be achieved.

It is unclear, however, that the use of violence as a primary means of implementing social change has ever worked even partially without exacting terrible costs.

Perchance your "primary suggestion" should be reconsidered.

Missn-Hitch

(1,383 posts)
24. It's certainly not my primary but it's an option. I am hearing a lot of
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 07:30 PM
Sep 2016

"chatter" from the other side. Cheers LF!

DustyJoe

(849 posts)
103. supervised by the UN
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 02:43 PM
Sep 2016

A lot of the UN member nations are hosts and enablers of the worlds greatest terrorist and murdering groups. They are going to be really busy trying to hold their logic in this edict across all member nations.
The UN is a toothless political organization not even a shadow of what it was built on and holds no sway with the world governments that ignore its edicts every day.

 

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)
7. If you honestly believed that, then you'd be paying them
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 04:54 PM
Sep 2016

Oh right...
You're one of those people who think other people should have to pay.

xocet

(3,871 posts)
12. I just read your other post.
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 05:14 PM
Sep 2016

It seems that the view that you describe is very narrowly defined.

First of all, it seems that (to you) reparations equate purely to payments to individuals. IF you were to reread the article, you would find:

"The reparations could come in a variety of forms, according to the panel, including "a formal apology, health initiatives, educational opportunities ... psychological rehabilitation, technology transfer and financial support, and debt cancellation." "

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/09/27/u-s-owes-black-people-reparations-for-a-history-of-racial-terrorism-says-u-n-panel/


Also, you seem to have been around some sort of RW propaganda source a little too long - it might be influencing your thinking. "Racial collective guilt" has nothing to do with reparations. A desire for social justice and equality in the USA (you know: e pluribus unum et cetera) are the reasons (beyond the obvious moral reasons) that such a program is desired - it is in everyone's self-interest (all citizens) to have a better present-day society.



 

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)
18. None of those are free. Are you going to give up your prosperity?
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 06:07 PM
Sep 2016

Of course not. Because you don't believe the cause justifies your sacrifice.

Tell me again why I should be forced to pay for your collective racial guilt.

xocet

(3,871 posts)
22. "None of those are free." What is the price of a "formal apology" these days?
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 07:09 PM
Sep 2016

You must live in an extraordinary world if you think that what amounts to striving to perfect the union is going to cost you "your prosperity."

Beyond that, one must ask: What cause? What sacrifice? What guilt? (You assume a lot in your posts.)

Since you seemingly focus primarily on the financial aspects of a moral issue, one thing that you might consider is what the fiscal cost of maintaining the status quo is. What is the cost to society of mass incarceration? What is the cost to society of lack of educational opportunities? What is the cost to society of lack of universal access to healthcare? etc.

 

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)
27. What is the apology for? Racial collective guilt is racism
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 07:46 PM
Sep 2016

"You must live in an extraordinary world if you think that what amounts to striving to perfect the union is going to cost you "your prosperity." "
You want to unilaterally declare that your opinions "perfect the union" despite valid counter opinions. Should my reply be sticking my fingers in my ears and shouting "My policies perfect the union more than your's!"?

Reparations are institutional racism. It is a moral issue. It's immoral to use race as a basis for forced asset seizure. Even when you have high minded goals.

All the problems you listed have simple progressive solutions that don't require egregious policies.

xocet

(3,871 posts)
47. As noted before, you assume a lot in your reading (or casual perusal) of articles and replies.
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 01:50 AM
Sep 2016

It would seems that the word reparation has a very narrow meaning in your mind. Here is a definition for you:

reparation

  1. the making of amends for wrong or injury done: reparation for an injustice.
  2. Usually, reparations. compensation in money, material, labor, etc., payable by a defeated country to another country or to an individual for loss suffered during or as a result of war.
  3. restoration to good condition.
  4. repair1 (def 7).


http://www.dictionary.com/browse/reparation?s=t


Definition 2 seems to be all that you can see before you launch into tirades regarding "forced asset seizure", "collective guilt" and "racism". The "egregious policies" that you mention are your own straw men clouding your vision.
 

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)
79. This is professional level disingenuous behavior
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 09:38 AM
Sep 2016

You want forced asset seizure and transfer. You can try to hide behind pedantic and disingenuous attempts to avoid the inevitable forced asset seizures from reparations, but no one is buying it.

Every policy suggested has a cost and you want the assets of whites seized to pay that cost. It's only a strawman if you didn't support reparations. Where does the money required to pay reparations (cash or in kind) come from?

Missn-Hitch

(1,383 posts)
25. What do you mean by prosperity?
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 07:40 PM
Sep 2016

Are you saying we can spend $100M on one F-35 fighter jet and we can't spend a little on healthcare facilities, infrastructure, and it goes on. It's all about priorities. I know, we could spend more money on prisons and then let private companies operate them - at a profit. Nice.

 

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)
36. Let's do that and not have it racially exclusionary (reparations)
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 10:52 PM
Sep 2016

I agree. We should spend less on the military.

brush

(53,778 posts)
28. How about a slice of the hughly bloated military budget go to college education . . .
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 07:54 PM
Sep 2016

funds, small business grants to qualified applicants, job training, community facilities, etc.

Notice I didn't include checks cut to individuals, and no provision for individuals to help pay for the much deserved reparations to African Americans and others.

 

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)
35. Why would any of those policies need to be racially exclusionary
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 10:49 PM
Sep 2016

You're not making the case for reparations, you're making the cases for progressive policies. We should do those things for everyone.

brush

(53,778 posts)
38. Sure, do progressive things for everyone but we've swept hundreds of years . . .
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 11:12 PM
Sep 2016

of unpaid, stolen labor of enslaved African Americans under the rug, hundreds of year of racial discrimination because of skin pigment, several decades of lynchings and Jim Crow, and now modern day lynchings with the killings of unarmed black men, it's time to deal with our historical cruelty towards people of color, especially black people.

Do you realize that if the hundreds of year of labor by enslaved African Americans had been paid to them, they would have had something to pass down to their families. Maybe family wealth of African Americans would not be lagging behind that of white families so severly.

Do you not also realize that if the principle of compounding were employed, if those hundreds of years of stolen labor came due, the US Treasure would not be able to pay it so it would be a bargain to set up a college education fund, small business grants, job training programs and community facilities — you know some goodwill effort to make up, in a small way for all the racism that we are still to this day experiencing (see Charlotte and Tulsa for just the latest, glaring examples)

I just don't get the resistance to this (nothing from individuals but a small slice from the bloated military budget). There is no denying the racist history of the country. We know horrible cruelty was done. Why not try, in this small and relatively inexpensive way, considering the horrible damage done to a people, this good faith way to make amends?

Sand Rat Expat

(290 posts)
39. Perhaps this is the cynic in me talking, but...
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 11:57 PM
Sep 2016

I doubt there'd be much "goodwill" as a result of the kind of reparations you're talking about.

On the one hand, there would be a great number of people who would be pissed off about reparations being paid. They'd view it as theft of their resources for a crime they took no part in, especially if reparations involved payments to individuals. So rather than unify people, this would only create discontent among people who would feel that they're being punished for something they didn't do. Children of immigrants would particularly have this reaction.

On the other hand, the people in the African-American community who are most vociferously calling for reparations would not, in my opinion, feel much "goodwill" here either. Does your bank feel "goodwill" towards you when you pay them what you owe them? Similarly, the most outspoken people calling for reparations would likely have a reaction more along the lines of "About damn time!" than "Thanks!" Or they'd say that it wasn't enough, will never be enough, etc. etc. I've read articles by African-Americans saying that the only "fair" payment would be the transfer of all wealth held by white Americans to African-Americans. So I rather doubt they'd consider what you're proposing to be sufficient.

Rather than bring people together, these reactions would only drive people further apart. You'd have a significant chunk of those who are supporting these reparations with their tax monies feeling cheated and embittered, and you'd have a portion of those receiving these reparations feeling cheated and embittered because they feel it's not enough.

Again, maybe it's just my inner cynic talking after going through a very rough week. I dunno. People being people, though, I don't think I'm far off the mark here.

brush

(53,778 posts)
40. I said early on there should be no payments to individuals
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 12:14 AM
Sep 2016

Why the resistance. There is no denying the racist cruelty done, not to mention the STOLEN, UNPAID LABOR FOR CENTURIES.

Doing something shows good will. All the excuses not to do something that you mention can be worked out.

Google the Dawes Rolls to see a precedent of who would be included.

It can and should be done as the horrible injustices were definitely done.

We all know this, and they are continuing — as I said, see Charleston and Tulsa.

It's telling that an international body understands that reparations resources should be made available to descendants of those whose labor and freedom was stolen for hundreds of years but people here who have benefited directly or indirectly from discrimination against African Americans can't, or don't want to see it.

Response to brush (Reply #38)

Response to brush (Reply #38)

Response to brush (Reply #38)

anniebelle

(899 posts)
63. I guess it's because it was black people (not white people) kept as slaves, DUH!
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 06:27 AM
Sep 2016

I know a whole lot of people who have no qualms about using/miss-using other humans ( I've lived in the confederacy all my 71 years), so I hear it every where I go ~ I see Nazi flags hanging in my neighbors' yards ~ all white people, just like me. They have no problem with a Mexican mowing their yard for $5.00, but by gawd he better get his ass back to Mexico when he's done. They have no problem with having every privilege available to them (just because they were born white) ~ the best schools, go any where they want without fear of being shot for walking with skittles and iced tea, and yet, the majority of them are dumb as a box of rocks and know more about NASCAR and porn than what this country has achieved on the backs of slaves and yet, they're so blinded by their hate, they don't even know they're slaves too ~ they just make a FEW more dollars ~ just enough to keep them in their shacks and their pickemup trucks and have enough to go buy a lottery ticket every week. But, it gets them to vote against their best interest every time and keep the trillions going to the military and the banksters. I never thought I would live to see the day this country ~ humpin' their bibles, wavin' their flags, turn into such a ship of fools.

Response to anniebelle (Reply #63)

anniebelle

(899 posts)
67. Well, sorry they removed that typical racist's remark so soon. I had some facts for him.
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 07:00 AM
Sep 2016

Last edited Wed Sep 28, 2016, 07:44 AM - Edit history (2)

But I could tell he is not interested in facts ~ he lives over there in that other universe reserved for total idiots. Anyway, for any others that might be thinking he had some 'points' to consider.
Many people who consider themselves “white” would be surprised to discover they have African ancestry — especially those in the South.

In an ironic twist, a new study has found that some of the states with the most racial tension are also the ones where the most white people have black ancestors. The findings published this month in the American Journal of Human Genetics found that whites in the South were far more likely to have black ancestry than any other part of the country.

Researchers examined 145,000 DNA samples provided to genetic testing company 23andme for ancestry analysis. They have now determined that at least six million Americans who called themselves white had at least 1 percent African ancestry.

Oh, I almost forgot to mention, most of this is because White slave owners enjoyed as part of their 'ownership', sex with the black females in their 'stables' ~ Thomas Jefferson, just to name one of many. Probably with the black 'studs' too, but of course, they could not reproduce.

Response to anniebelle (Reply #67)

 

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)
78. Sounds like you're filled with racial animus
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 09:12 AM
Sep 2016

Empty the hate that's in your heart.

The sins of 150 years ago don't justify racist policies today.

But please explain why you're ignoring the hundreds of thousands on non-African slaves. Why are you spreading misinformation about the racial composition of slavery in America? Slavery was never an exclusively race based system of oppression.

anniebelle

(899 posts)
80. You need a history lesson about slavery, obviously.
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 09:43 AM
Sep 2016

Over the period of the Atlantic Slave Trade, from approximately 1526 to 1867, some 12.5 million slaves had been shipped from Africa, and 10.7 million had arrived in the Americas. The Atlantic Slave Trade was likely the most costly in human life of all of long-distance global migrations.

The first Africans forced to work in the New World left from Europe at the beginning of the sixteenth century, not from Africa. The first slave voyage direct from Africa to the Americas probably sailed in 1526.

The volume of slaves carried off from Africa reached thirty thousand per year in the 1690s and eighty-five thousand per year a century later. More than eight out of ten Africans forced into the slave trade made their journeys in the century and a half after 1700.

By 1820, nearly four Africans for every one European had crossed the Atlantic. About four out of every five females that traversed the Atlantic were from Africa.

The majority of enslaved Africans were brought to British North America between 1720 and 1780. The decade 1821 to 1830 still saw over 80,000 people a year leaving Africa in slave ships. Well over a million more – one tenth of the volume carried off in the slave trade era – followed within the next twenty years.

In your next lesson, you might want to study up on Chinese enslavement and Latino enslavement which is prevalent in today's America.

But, I guess more importantly, you need to learn to stick to the topic at hand. The topic read:

U.S. owes black people reparations for a history of ‘racial terrorism,’ says U.N. panel

 

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)
83. Already knew that. Still doesn't justify institutional racism (reparations)
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 10:57 AM
Sep 2016

The sins of the past don't justify the sins of the present. It's not acceptable for you to be racist because other people in the past used to be racist.

It's not acceptable to be racist because people in the present are racist either.

anniebelle

(899 posts)
102. You obviously did not read the title of the post I was responding to.
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 02:28 PM
Sep 2016

Pay attention taitertots ~ try to keep up with the rest of the class. The OP was titled:

U.S. owes black people reparations for a history of ‘racial terrorism,’ says U.N. panel

I have no 'hate' in my heart. How 'bout your putting a brain in your head before you make an ass of yourself. Maybe the next OP will be on the 'hundreds of thousands of non-African slaves."

And by the way, I don't owe you any kind of explanation about my responses to OPs.

 

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)
104. I read it. Your heart is filled with hatred.
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 03:54 PM
Sep 2016

You claimed that no white people were slaves.
"I guess it's because it was black people (not white people) kept as slaves, DUH!"
That is a demonstrablely false. I'm not going to let you lie about history and spread misinformation without calling you out.

The OP is about race based forced asset seizure (reparations). The truth about history is contextual to the subject. Otherwise your supporting taking money from the children of slaves to give to the children of slave owners based solely on your racist attitudes about stuff that happened 150 years ago.

Response to xocet (Reply #2)

brush

(53,778 posts)
84. Formerly enslaved people of course are not still living (but you knew that). Their descendants . . .
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 11:00 AM
Sep 2016

are however. Google the Dawes Rolls for a precedent if you want to know how those descendants could be found and their authenticity determined.

Response to brush (Reply #84)

 

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)
5. Racial collective guilt is racism
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 04:52 PM
Sep 2016

If you support it, you're a racist.

Its trying to remedy injustice in the past with present day injustice. Two wrongs don't make a right.

Wednesdays

(17,374 posts)
14. You are on the wrong side of history
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 05:52 PM
Sep 2016

Things are going get very uncomfortable for you in the next several years.

 

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)
15. Your defense of racism puts you on the wrong side of history
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 05:58 PM
Sep 2016

The defense of racial collective guilt puts you in the same camp as the KKK, Aryan Nation, David Duke....

I don't have to worry because your brand of racism (collective racial guilt via reparations) has no wider support. Probably because it's disgusting bigotry.

Missn-Hitch

(1,383 posts)
26. Let's race. 1 mile. I get 1/2 mile head start.
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 07:46 PM
Sep 2016

Hell, it was illegal for "freed" slaves to read until the latter half of our country's existence.

 

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)
33. When our great grand kids race, will your's need that same advantage?
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 10:42 PM
Sep 2016

To compensate for having their great grand parent lose an unequal race?

Would you call that equality?

Missn-Hitch

(1,383 posts)
101. Respectfully. So you do admit that inequality exists present day?
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 02:15 PM
Sep 2016

I believe the goal would be to PREVENT future inequality.

Again, respectfully, do you envision "reparations" as a way for black folk to take over and enslave the white folk?

Cheers.

 

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)
106. I'm worried about inequity.
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 07:34 PM
Sep 2016

Your goal creates inequity as a way to reduce inequality. Having laudable goals is nothing when the attempts to meet those goals is inherently racist, unreasonable, and rejected by the vast majority.

My ideological goals reduce inequity. The result reduces inequality. The ends and the means are both desirable.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
43. How did my privilege get checked?
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 12:57 AM
Sep 2016

I was pointing out that the person I was responding to was using their white privilege to explain racism.

 

GummyBearz

(2,931 posts)
95. Don't worry about it
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 12:24 PM
Sep 2016

I replied to the other guy. Congrats on checking his privilege yesterday and keep up the good work

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
100. The entire concept of collective guilt is horrific.
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 01:29 PM
Sep 2016

Those who believe in it are no better than the Nazi's or the KKK. It's the same ideology those organizations were built upon, and it's an ideology that regularly leads to acts of horrific violence and genocide.

"Some members of 'INSERT ETHNIC/SOCIAL GROUP HERE' committed the crime of 'INSERT CRIME HERE'. All members of 'INSERT ETHNIC/SOCIAL GROUP HERE' share some blame. All members of 'INSERT ETHNIC/SOCIAL GROUP HERE' share guilt."

Once you start with that premise that someone is guilty simply because of who they are, escalating things is simply a matter of bringing "justice" to the "guilty".

Everything from the Nazi's killing the Jews, to the killing fields of Cambodia and the Rwandan Genocide can be traced to the same underlying concept of collectivized guilt. Hell, slavery itself was justified using the concept, because it was long believed by Christians that blacks were descended from Ham and therefore shared his curse and the guilt of his crime.

Collective guilt is racism and bigotry in one of its purest forms.

JustAnotherGen

(31,823 posts)
30. I'd be happy with the 40 acres
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 08:05 PM
Sep 2016

Weed will be a black industry - it's the new funeral home. I think mules bite. Hmmm - I will send mine to Trump. He's a jackass so they will get along.

Response to Coolest Ranger (Reply #9)

Archae

(46,327 posts)
10. Reparations is a stupid concept.
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 05:02 PM
Sep 2016

First, who would collect it?
And from whom?

All of my ancestors came to the US after 1900, decades after slavery ended.

Who hands it out? Yet another red-tape factory of a bureaucracy?

And who would get it?

Most blacks in the US aren't entirely black.

Should Obama get half "his share" of the money, since he's half black?

christx30

(6,241 posts)
81. Because people don't want to shell out a bunch of money
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 10:01 AM
Sep 2016

to pay for crimes that they had nothing to do with.
But it's really a dead letter anyway. The majority of the American people would never agree to it. Any politician that brings it up as a serious issue is going to find himself on the streets very quickly. And even if it were to become law, the IRS would receive a lot of photos of middle fingers instead of payments.

And I say this as a Hispanic.

brush

(53,778 posts)
29. If you had a little more knowledge you'd know it isn't stupid and there is a precedent
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 07:57 PM
Sep 2016

Google the Dawes Rolls.

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
73. Obama would get nothing, because his ancestors were never enslaved.
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 08:19 AM
Sep 2016

The concept is not hard, if one is willing to learn.

EX500rider

(10,847 posts)
20. I bet if I wrote:
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 06:40 PM
Sep 2016

"it is so easy to tell which people in the thread are ( )" Fill in blank with any other race then white and it would be alerted and locked.

ronnie624

(5,764 posts)
16. "The dangerous ideology of white supremacy
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 06:02 PM
Sep 2016

inhibits social cohesion amongst the US population."

You can see it in the widespread support for Donald Trump.

Shameful.

BumRushDaShow

(128,979 posts)
17. The OP is the final report from that committee
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 06:02 PM
Sep 2016

As added info - the preliminary report had been released this past January and had been due for final release this month (the OP) - http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2016/0131/UN-group-recommends-reparatory-justice-for-African-Americans

Buckeye_Democrat

(14,853 posts)
44. What about reparations for women?
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 01:07 AM
Sep 2016

Women have been exploited and mistreated since the dawn of humanity.

Pay up, fellas!

Response to NWCorona (Original post)

Response to CincyDem (Reply #58)

Response to NWCorona (Original post)

Response to NWCorona (Original post)

Response to CincyDem (Reply #56)

68. Perhaps those reparations could be paid by the current slaveholders in saudi arabia
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 07:04 AM
Sep 2016

and sudan. Have the brazilians already paid reparations for their history of slavery? How about the belgians and dutch who profited from the slave trade?

Yes, the system is far from ideal, but if punishment and reparations need to take place, other transgressions might take priority. I'm looking at you, king leopold and every german and spaniard. Perhaps every nanogram of gold in europe could be liquidated to pay every victim of "white man's burden."

Lochloosa

(16,064 posts)
70. One flaw in your argument...we are the "Greatest County on Earth" remember.
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 07:33 AM
Sep 2016

We are supposed to lead not follow.

polynomial

(750 posts)
90. The indigenous population too
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 11:28 AM
Sep 2016

Slave trade goes back before Christ. Any Jew Knows, or any Nazi. It is a very passionate idea to just blame the Americas for slavery.

When in human events it is needed to be protracted back to the Old World Royals, demarked by the old world east of the twentieth meridian and west of the one hundredth and sixtieth meridian should also participate in reparations.

Yet better America needs to appreciate the indigenous population, the American Indian that is slandered in today’s political rhetoric.

The Mexican American is peddled into fear and anguish of deportation. That relates to incredible hatred in gangs and crime.

That gives rise to bitter frustration from the long history of bias hatred in culture of the old world style Republican reaching back to before the medieval Roman Republic Latin language in legal Tort laws abused today, now whites against whites…in open in your face lies political commercials supported by mainstream media.

Here the media is muzzled or complicit to this period that is possible to become a Republican Trump Tragedy with misery extending the ghettos across America.

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
72. reparations!
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 08:08 AM
Sep 2016

I learned about this extensively a while ago. It's a tricky subject.

Not only because it would cause unnecessary tension between black and white people but it would also cause tension amongst black people.

The debate is, would reparations only be given to black folk who had ancestors in enslavement? Or all disadvantaged black folk that can prove their circumstances are because of slavery in the past? Should successful black people, regardless of ancestry get reparations even though they clearly weren't disadvantaged like others? And if they did, would the affected AA's think it unfair that their wealthy black neighbor also gets a windfall? What about Irish descendants who had ancestors in enslavement? They're white, would that pose a problem?

Reparations. It's a lot more complex than just giving money out.

But to make it clear, if we could find a way, I would support it.

brush

(53,778 posts)
89. Reparations, IMO to avoid many of the things you mention, should not be in the form of . . .
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 11:16 AM
Sep 2016

checks cut to individuals but in perhaps college education funds, job training programs, small business grants for legitimate applicants, community facilities, etc.

A Dawes Rolls type validation program could be established to determine eligibility.

Response to brush (Reply #89)

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
75. This is a great topic for discussion.
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 08:31 AM
Sep 2016

Predictably, looking down the thread, some have already gone off the rails because they couldn't debate it with civility. They could take some debate pointers from Clinton.

I'm going to read on down and see if I have anything to add.

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
76. So
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 08:45 AM
Sep 2016

while reading down the thread was certainly illuminating, I'm not going to step into that mess. I'll focus on the article:

This conclusion was part of a study by the United Nations' Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent, a body that reports to the international organization's High Commissioner on Human Rights. The group of experts, which includes leading human rights lawyers from around the world, presented its findings to the United Nations Human Rights Council on Monday, pointing to the continuing link between present injustices and the dark chapters of American history.

"In particular, the legacy of colonial history, enslavement, racial subordination and segregation, racial terrorism and racial inequality in the United States remains a serious challenge, as there has been no real commitment to reparations and to truth and reconciliation for people of African descent," the report stated. "Contemporary police killings and the trauma that they create are reminiscent of the past racial terror of lynching."

Citing the past year's spate of police officers killing unarmed African American men, the panel warned against "impunity for state violence," which has created, in its words, a "human rights crisis" that "must be addressed as a matter of urgency."


I don't care if you call it reparations or something else. The point is to break that link with the past that continues to allow, to encourage even, African Americans to be treated like second class citizens, and like criminals deserving of public and private physical and economic violence.

I'm sorry that it takes an outside agency to point all of this out, but I'm grateful for this report.

ronnie624

(5,764 posts)
82. According to a lot of people,
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 10:28 AM
Sep 2016

all the injusice of slavery was wiped clean as if it never happened, at the moment the Emancipation Proclamation was issued.

Response to ronnie624 (Reply #82)

Response to NWCorona (Original post)

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
93. A lot of messages deleted and names removed on this thread
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 11:36 AM
Sep 2016

Apparently, this is a tough subject to have a reasonable conversation about here.

What's your perspective on it?

ronnie624

(5,764 posts)
94. Practically the entire continent of Africa is owed reparations.
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 12:11 PM
Sep 2016

Western capitalists have been brutally exploiting the people and resources for centuries, and it continues to this day. Those who believe the injustice ended with slavery, are delusional, and have little interest in learning the truth.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
96. I can appreciate the concept of reparations. IMO, if they were to happen
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 12:31 PM
Sep 2016

It should be by community or organizations, not individual.

Perhaps a multi-stream infusion of money.

Some going into community-building (clinics, schools, housing)
Some going into house-ownership subsidies
Some going to educational grants

In other words, not a direct payout to individuals.

But Governmental Organizations that can disperse funds to help groups and families move forward.

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
98. How would it work? I mean, which "black people" would qualify?
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 12:41 PM
Sep 2016

Would there be DNA testing to determine who gets the biggest share? Many Americans are part black but look white.
Do the dark skinned black people get more money than the lighter skinned people?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. owes black people re...