Hill drops out of U.S. Senate race; Bayh likely to enter
Source: Evansville Courier and Press
In a twist that could influence control of the U.S. Senate, Baron Hill announced today he is dropping out of the race for U.S. Senate, presumably to make room for Evan Bayh, who served as both as a senator and governor of Indiana
Hill did not mention Bayh by name in his announcement, only saying that a nominee with better name recognition would help the Democratic Party take over the U.S. Senate.
"Democrats have a very real chance at winning this Senate seat, especially with a strong nominee who has the money, name identification and resources to win," Hill said. "I do not want to stand in the way of Democrats winning Indiana and the U.S. Senate."
An announcement from Bayh saying he will be asking to be placed on the ballot is expected later Monday. His return to politics will shake up the race for Indiana's open U.S. Senate seat, which is being vacated by Sen. Dan Coats at the end of the year. Coats' seat was originally Bayh's seat when Bayh announced he wouldn't be running for re-election in 2010.
Read more: http://www.courierpress.com/news/state/hill-drops-out-of-us-senate-race-bayh-likely-to-enter-375d5caf-1395-4457-e053-0100007f790c-386306571.html
LittleGirl
(8,292 posts)He screwed over Indiana when he dropped out of the race and gave Hoosiers Dan Coats because he waited too long to make a decision. I doubt I'd forgive Bayh for that considering he left the state to work as a lobbyist. Just the facts folks.
bucolic_frolic
(43,547 posts)at the time, which was very little,
DINO, or close to it.
LittleGirl
(8,292 posts)over Obama and I don't remember exactly what he said, can't quote but if he sees Clinton winning, I'm sure he's going to latch on to that in order to advance his position. His father, rest in peace, was a true liberal.
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)LittleGirl
(8,292 posts)Maybe I'm thinking of his grandfather. Birch
sobenji
(316 posts)LittleGirl
(8,292 posts)Cosmocat
(14,595 posts)Just conservative democrats.
That is a simple reality of where we are today.
I know idealistically we would want to see fire breathing progressives like Sherrod Brown or Elizabeth Warren all over the place, like you see to the right for team R. They MOSTLY are flame throwing jackasses, but even the ones who aren't VOTE uniformly with the ones who do.
Just not the reality of where things are today.
The "middle" exists in the democratic party.
The Evan Bayhs of the world.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Pretty Red State here. But we actually have a shot at TWO Democratic Senators. In this case, "perfect" is definitely the enemy of "good enough." Bayh is still very popular here and would make a hard pull for Indiana much easier.
cstanleytech
(26,364 posts)have to change suddenly like a massive IQ boost for the population or something similar that would cause the majority of voters to think for themselves rather than being told what to think or believe in.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)as neither of those to change qualifiers is likely to occur anytime soon.
cstanleytech
(26,364 posts)on it
caraher
(6,279 posts)I would have bet heavily against that, too!
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)radical noodle
(8,020 posts)Being a Democrat, even a middle of the road one, is not easy. Bayh is about as good as it will get and he will support Dems in most things... but he would represent a very conservative state.
blue neen
(12,336 posts)but, there are people who live in the "middle".
Middle does not equal Conservative.
Zen Democrat
(5,901 posts)blue neen
(12,336 posts)You probably know more about him than I do. It does seem, though, that in the state of Indiana it would be difficult to get someone who is considered far left elected to the Senate, so Bayh may be a good choice for Indiana.
It would be great if Democrats could pick up another seat.....
n2doc
(47,953 posts)But nothing other than a 'sensible woodchuck', so to speak.
Cosmocat
(14,595 posts)nm
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)The very worst of both "--NO" suffix candidates vote with the opposing party about 20% of the time, almost never in leadership elections, and always count when assigning invaluable committee headcounts and chairs. So imagine the worst D you can running against the best R (and in IN it's not like you'll be running against anything even approaching the best R). You get 60% more D leaning votes on the roll call and another checkbox for getting Ds to set the agenda and pass bills out of committee purgatory. That's only "slight" to blind ideologues.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)whereas, Democrats cannot count on conservative Democrats to write progressive legislation, they ARE a fairly reliable caucus consistent vote on the big legislation (somewhere around 80+%) and, regardless of their voting record, are on the roll that determines House/Senate majorities (i.e., committee leadership).
RandySF
(59,874 posts)That works for me.
still_one
(92,535 posts)Indiana today.
Bayh would be better than a republican, if for only the fact that it could help Democrats assume the majority in the Senate
No, I am not a fan of Bayh, but I sure would rather have a Democrat in that seat than a republican
radical noodle
(8,020 posts)at least in the area in which I lived most of my life. I don't think a true progressive has a chance in hell of winning Indiana unless running against a Communist or a Martian.
still_one
(92,535 posts)seabeckind
(1,957 posts)Whole bunch of disgruntled people in the cities and university cities.
They more than match the disgruntled teanuts in numbers.
Give them something to vote for and they'll come out.
radical noodle
(8,020 posts)They hadn't voted for a Dem for president since LBJ. Hillary beat Obama there in the primary. The 2008 vote was all about Dubya. Romney beat Obama by about 10 points in 2012. I lived in Indiana for 65 years. It's just super conservative.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)seabeckind
(1,957 posts)He's third way, neoliberal.
IOW, reagan economics wrapped in a liberal (to some extent) social leaning.
RandySF
(59,874 posts)still_one
(92,535 posts)seabeckind
(1,957 posts)tonyt53
(5,737 posts)Bayh WILL vote with the majority of the Democratic Party Senators. This gives Dems one down, five more to go.
TwilightZone
(25,523 posts)Numbers are numbers, with the possible exception of Ben Nelson, and even his ~50% was better than 0%.
And, Bayh isn't Nelson.
sobenji
(316 posts)I'm doing backflips (not really...too old, too fat).
Sure he's not as progressive as I'd like, but Baron Hill (who's also isn't very progressive) was never going to beat Todd Young.
Bayh voted for the ACA, and voted along party lines 95% of the time. His name is like royalty here.
He will confirm HRC's judicial appointments, and more importantly, may help her win Indiana.
Great day for Hoosiers.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)This form is the place to bash Democrats not to pointing out that a moderate Democrat would still invite with the party on the overwhelming majority of issues and would be 1 million times better than a Republican.
I'll pretend to be outraged
LiberalFighter
(51,393 posts)Checking govtrack and it appears ideology they are nearly the same. But, I think Baron Hill though was becoming more liberal. The problem likely is name recognition.
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)better a Democrat votes with our side 75% of the time than a Republican who votes 0%.
Those who don't understand that reality... well, they don't understand at all.
Moostache
(9,897 posts)I was surprised Bayh left in the first place, but in the back of my mind I assumed he would resurface again.
He is probably the only kind of Democrat that can win in Indiana these days. Maybe not perfect, but I can see him counting as head count for the chamber and also a semi-reliable Democratic vote on issues.
riversedge
(70,474 posts)FBaggins
(26,797 posts)I thought that the filing deadline was long since past for all but "I"s?
caraher
(6,279 posts)According to the link in the OP, there is a committee of 33 state Democratic leaders who will select a nominee. It may not be Bayh... in theory.
But it will be Bayh.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)He's just never appealed to me.
But, if he runs, I hope he beats the R.