Breaking: Judge Rules Mississippi Clerks Cannot Cite Religious Beliefs to Refuse Marriage Licenses
Last edited Mon Jun 27, 2016, 08:09 PM - Edit history (2)
Source: Associated Press
@BreakingNews: Judge rules Mississippi clerks cannot cite religious beliefs to refuse marriage licenses to same-sex couples - AP https://t.co/B280KKuyyO/s/tGr2
Judge Rules MS Clerks Cannot Cite Religion To Abstain From Issuing Marriage Licenses
EMILY WAGSTER PETTUS
JUNE 27, 2016
JACKSON, Miss. (AP) A federal judge has ruled that Mississippi clerks cannot cite their own religious beliefs to recuse themselves from issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
U.S. District Judge Carlton Reeves' ruling on Monday blocks the state from enforcing part of a religious objections bill that was supposed to become law Friday.
Reeves is extending his previous order that overturned Mississippi's ban on same-sex marriage. He says circuit clerks are required to provide equal treatment for all couples, gay or straight.
Mississippi's religious objections measure, House Bill 1523 , was filed in response to last summer's U.S. Supreme Court ruling that legalized gay marriage nationwide.
Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/judge-mississippi-gay-marriage-clerks
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)If you don't want serve people find a different job
forest444
(5,902 posts)generally only means that government offices should be a short walk away from the nearest Baptist church.
A real short walk.
LuvNewcastle
(16,867 posts)The state Capitol and the First Baptist Church of Jackson just happen to be right across the street from one another.
forest444
(5,902 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)pepperbear
(5,648 posts)keithbvadu2
(37,044 posts)floriduck
(2,262 posts)emordnilaP
(5 posts)TonyPDX
(962 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,207 posts)Same bullshit excuse, same outcome.
Night Watchman
(743 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,254 posts)First the 2 SCOTUS rulings now this. Care to join me in a celebratory cocktail?
Fritz Walter
(4,292 posts)Oh, yeah.
He's not campaigning for the Repuke candidacy any more.
And can scarcely afford another costly lawsuit over music-copyright issues.
malthaussen
(17,237 posts)Appeals, stays, appeals of the stay... stay tuned.
-- Mal
lark
(23,193 posts)They must be beside themselves that the courts are taking away their, , God given right to discriminate against young women having sex with no potential of pregnancy. OH, the horrors!!!
emordnilaP
(5 posts)They'll be back with the same bullshit
again and again, forever....
always twisting up new excuses
for the same old bigotry.
lark
(23,193 posts)They are total believers in the "big lie". Tell a big enough lie all the time, never stop, publish the lie, rant about the lie, and sooner or later people will start to believe it and accept it as truth. Pay raises cause job loss is one of their big lies. Abortion makes women crazy and live lives of regret, another huge whopper. Can raise taxes on rich because they are the job makers is one of the biggest lies.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,740 posts)The comments are predictable.
Jimmie E. Gates, The Clarion-Ledger 8:42 p.m. CDT June 27, 2016
Published June 28, 2016 · FoxNews.com
A federal judge ruled Monday that Mississippi clerks cannot cite religious beliefs to recuse themselves from issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
The ruling by U.S. District Judge Carlton Reeves blocks the state from enforcing part of a religious objections bill that was supposed to become law Friday. Reeves is extending his previous order that overturned Mississippis ban on same-sex marriage. He said circuit clerks are required to provide equal treatment for all coupes, gay or straight.
The states religious objections measure, House Bill 1523, was filed in response to last summers Supreme Court ruling that legalized gay marriage nationwide. That ruling is called the Obergefell case, after the man who filed it.
"Mississippi's elected officials may disagree with Obergefell, of course, and may express that disagreement as they see fit by advocating for a constitutional amendment to overturn the decision, for example," Reeves wrote Monday. "But the marriage license issue will not be adjudicated anew after every legislative session."