Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Mon May 28, 2012, 06:05 PM May 2012

Romney's Memorial Day Promise: To Maintain A US Military 'With No Comparable Power Anywhere'

Source: Associated Press

SAN DIEGO — Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney promised Monday to maintain an American military "with no comparable power anywhere in the world."

The likely Republican presidential nominee faced a San Diego crowd estimated at 5,000 in what was billed as a Memorial Day service paying tribute to the nation's war dead, not a campaign rally. But without naming his general election rival, Romney drew clear contrasts with President Barack Obama on the issue of defense.

The Democratic president has proposed reducing the size of the military following the end of the U.S. combat role in Iraq and plans to removes troops from Afghanistan at the end of 2014.

"We have two courses we can follow: One is to follow in the pathway of Europe, to shrink our military smaller and smaller to pay for our social needs," Romney said outside the city's Veterans Memorial Center and Museum. "The other is to commit to preserve America as the strongest military in the world, second to none, with no comparable power anywhere in the world."

Read more: http://www.greenfieldreporter.com/view/story/055a31b493ec4cda82d7ad7766d20eff/US--Romney



22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Romney's Memorial Day Promise: To Maintain A US Military 'With No Comparable Power Anywhere' (Original Post) Purveyor May 2012 OP
Classy, Mitt. Use a speech that's supposed to honor the fallen to prove a political point. Drunken Irishman May 2012 #1
Helluva challenge Mitt. How will you possibly achieve that? Scuba May 2012 #2
PLease. We can't even control Iraq or Affrigginganistan elehhhhna May 2012 #6
All the better to steal everyone's resources PDJane May 2012 #3
We can't even steal them! We pick places that... Bigmack May 2012 #21
Of course, because being able to blow up the world a million times TBF May 2012 #4
Military isn't a synonym for contractors. nt justice1 May 2012 #5
Wealready have that Mz Pip May 2012 #7
Just keep talking, Mitt. ensemble May 2012 #8
at least he admits we have "social needs" nt msongs May 2012 #9
He is so totally disconnected from reality............ Swede Atlanta May 2012 #10
We didn't do so bad pumping up our military during WW2 when we lumpy May 2012 #17
What? We should emulate North Korea? nobodyspecial May 2012 #11
Eisenhower must be spinning in his grave. For Romney it's the MIC above all else. libinnyandia May 2012 #12
Does he by any chance have a micropenis? kestrel91316 May 2012 #13
I could do that KamaAina May 2012 #14
ill take choice #1 Garion_55 May 2012 #15
And how many of your sons are going to enlist? spiderpig May 2012 #16
Excellent question Andy823 May 2012 #18
You summed it up better than I ever could, Andy. spiderpig May 2012 #19
"Rich kids have nothing to worry about." Amonester May 2012 #20
My dick's bigger than the rest of yours says Rmoney. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2012 #22
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
2. Helluva challenge Mitt. How will you possibly achieve that?
Mon May 28, 2012, 06:17 PM
May 2012

Fer krissakes, he wants to spend $2.1 trillion MORE on military and we're already spending more than the next eleven countries combined.

PDJane

(10,103 posts)
3. All the better to steal everyone's resources
Mon May 28, 2012, 06:18 PM
May 2012

And make them pay for the privilege of having the US steal them. Great. I mean, really guys.

 

Bigmack

(8,020 posts)
21. We can't even steal them! We pick places that...
Tue May 29, 2012, 02:05 PM
May 2012

... either have nothing significant to steal, or like Iraq, we invade them and screw things up so bad we don't even get a deal on the resources.

This country is simply not cut out to be an Empire. Big muscle... no brain.

"Kill their cattle and rape their women..... and don't get it backward like last time!"

TBF

(32,116 posts)
4. Of course, because being able to blow up the world a million times
Mon May 28, 2012, 06:20 PM
May 2012

is very important when people are starving. Thanks, Mitt, you pompous ass (with credit to Jane Curtin of course).



Mz Pip

(27,454 posts)
7. Wealready have that
Mon May 28, 2012, 06:31 PM
May 2012

and then some.

How does Mitt intend to pay for all of this increased military spending?

ensemble

(164 posts)
8. Just keep talking, Mitt.
Mon May 28, 2012, 06:47 PM
May 2012

Interesting how he phrased that: we can cut military spending and pay for social NEEDS, or have a huge military and... following his own words, presumably not pay for our social NEEDS.

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
10. He is so totally disconnected from reality............
Mon May 28, 2012, 06:58 PM
May 2012

We could cut our military spending by 50% and not affect our ability to defend the homeland. We couldn't engage in foreign wars of aggression or "fun" but we could protect the shores of our nation.

But even if we decided to do that....Mittens and his cadre of vultures wouldn't take the reductions on weapons programs that benefit the rich, he would take it out on the backs of the soldiers, airmen, sailors and marines. He would seek to slash their pay, benefits and security. He is all about enriching his cronies....

What a piece of unbridled greed he represents.

lumpy

(13,704 posts)
17. We didn't do so bad pumping up our military during WW2 when we
Mon May 28, 2012, 09:49 PM
May 2012

sorely needed to do just that. Economically this country was more secure than it is at this point.

nobodyspecial

(2,286 posts)
11. What? We should emulate North Korea?
Mon May 28, 2012, 07:02 PM
May 2012

Massive military regime while people die of starvation or lack of medical care or without heat or shelter -- you know, social programs.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
14. I could do that
Mon May 28, 2012, 07:32 PM
May 2012

and still save a sizable chunk of change for our "social needs".

How?, you ask. It's simple! Just reduce our military spending so it's only twice as much as the next ten countries combined, instead of three times.

Garion_55

(1,915 posts)
15. ill take choice #1
Mon May 28, 2012, 08:05 PM
May 2012

"We have two courses we can follow: One is to follow in the pathway of Europe, to shrink our military smaller and smaller to pay for our social needs," Romney said outside the city's Veterans Memorial Center and Museum......



which btw is what bush sr did with cheneys help and clinton continued. and it worked. id much rather slash our military in half and spend a trillion dollars fighting cancer.

but thats just me.

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
18. Excellent question
Mon May 28, 2012, 10:03 PM
May 2012

However I am afraid Romney will never answer that, but we all know the answer is NONE! Chicken hawks like Romney, and his sons, only like the idea of a huge military using all the young people that won't be able to find work if he becomes president. The right wing war mongers plan is to cut programs that help those in need, cut college loans, and keep those of military age unemployed so they can lure them into the military because there will be nothing else for them to do. The "RICH" will not have to worry about that because they can afford higher education, health care, a home, and pretty much anything they want.

The two class system is the "new world order" the right wants so much to see, with the rich at the top, and everyone else either being paid low, low wages with no benefits, or in the military fighting wars so the big corporations can take away resources from what ever country has them by simply finding an excuse to start a war. Rich kids have nothing to worry about.

spiderpig

(10,419 posts)
19. You summed it up better than I ever could, Andy.
Mon May 28, 2012, 10:39 PM
May 2012

He says all this crap with that blank look on his face and it just drives me crazy.

In a decent society his polling would be about 5%. Now they're saying he's in a horse race with Obama.

Ugh - are we in the Nation of the Stupid or what?

Peace.

Amonester

(11,541 posts)
20. "Rich kids have nothing to worry about."
Tue May 29, 2012, 01:07 PM
May 2012

That's what they think. But History gave lessons they should never ignore...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Romney's Memorial Day Pro...