Ashley Madison hack threatens to expose millions of users
Last edited Mon Jul 20, 2015, 06:17 AM - Edit history (2)
Source: Engadget
Ashley Madison, the dating website that purports to connect people looking for an affair, has been the victim of a hack that has exposed the personal data of its 37 million users. Krebs on Security is reporting that the perpetrators are a hacker or hackers going by the name of Impact Team. So far, only a small selection of information has been uploaded, but the group is threatening to post the entire haul unless Ashley Madison and sister site Established Men are shut down for good. CEO Noel Biderman has confirmed that the attack is legitimate and has pledged to take down compromising files as they're found online. Not that it's likely to be much comfort to the people waking up to find their personal details splashed across the internet.
It's believed that the hack was carried out because of a much-derided feature that the company offers called Full Delete. Should a user wish to leave the site, they can pay a $19 fee to have all of their personal data scrubbed from the Madison servers. There's only one catch: according to Impact Team, it's all a lie, and despite making $1.7 million from the service in 2014, the data remains safely preserved.
For his part, Biderman believes that the attack was an inside job and that he is close to confirming the identity of the culprit. Right now, it's thought that the person wasn't an employee, but someone who had "touched" the company's "technical services." That makes sense, since the Impact Team statement offers an apology to Mark Steele, the website's director of security.
At the time of publication, Ashley Madison remains online, but we imagine that we'll be spending the rest of the day updating this piece as new developments occur. Perhaps the company should change its tagline from "life is short, have an affair" to "it's all fun and games until everybody finds out."
Read more: http://www.engadget.com/2015/07/20/ashley-madison-hack/
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)Predictable too, this is the internet, and "information wants to be free". You put it on the internet, it's out there forever.
Facebook for philanderers doesn't seem like a good idea anyway, you know they are watching you and collecting your data and selling it.
Baitball Blogger
(46,775 posts)Edgar Hoover never had it so good.
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)Online cheaters exposed after hackers access AshleyMadison hookup site
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/07/20/online-cheaters-exposed-after-hackers-access-ashleymadison-hookup-site/
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)If you had people pay you to delete their compromising data, then didn't delete it, that's lawsuit city. The mere fact that you're charging them a fee to delete your data is already extortionate.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)that few will sue. Nobody who uses a site like that wants anyone else to know about it.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Calista241
(5,586 posts)I bet there are a significant number of members out there that actually want a divorce. Throw in the opportunity to make a little money off of it. Bingo!
corkhead
(6,119 posts)Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)DeeDeeNY
(3,356 posts)that Ashley Madison has 37 million users.
OnlinePoker
(5,728 posts)Still, a lot of people aren't happy in their relationships and there will always be a market for something like this.
Beauregard
(376 posts)Millions and millions.
Xithras
(16,191 posts)Doing the math, that's around 6 million people (3 million married couples) in the United States alone. And AM is a global site. Even if you pick the lowest global estimate for open marriages, it's been estimated that there are more than 100 million adults in the world who are in open relationships, and the number may be as high as three quarters of a billion globally if you use the higher estimates of open relationship frequency.
I'm sure that many of the AM site users are, in fact, cheating...but I do know for a fact that many people in consensual open marriages also used the site to find partners.
littlewolf
(3,813 posts)bananas
(27,509 posts)Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)Also, polyamory has nothing to do with cheating, no?
bananas
(27,509 posts)bananas
(27,509 posts)aceofblades
(73 posts)and belongings tossed out on the street lol
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Once you've got the code, there's very little involved with swapping out website names and graphics and snippets of text to recustomize a given dating website into any other dating website. I'm almost surprised they're not also 'FarmersOnly.com' and every other dating site out there.
7962
(11,841 posts)Lochloosa
(16,076 posts)No one else will have me.....
7962
(11,841 posts)dembotoz
(16,864 posts)pipoman
(16,038 posts)Vinca
(50,322 posts)Happyhippychick
(8,379 posts)There can't be a list with 37 million names, can there?
Igel
(35,383 posts)It would be a pain to print out and look through, though.
Or you can scroll ... and scroll ... and scroll ...
And hope to recognize the pseudonym your S.O. uses.
Happyhippychick
(8,379 posts)I would find him instantly!
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Xithras
(16,191 posts)Depending on the format of the data, it would take me less than an hour to hack out a rough app that merged the info with the Google maps API to generate a map of the cheaters in your area. I wouldn't personally put something like that together, but I'm sure we'll see something along those lines pop up fairly quickly.
PersonNumber503602
(1,134 posts)I could see them creating some sites that provide a nice interface in which someone just types in a name and it pulls up a list of all the hits. Then from there they click on each user to see all the data they have on that user. If they have messages and all that good stuff, I'd imagine it would be very popular.
Response to Bosonic (Original post)
Happyhippychick This message was self-deleted by its author.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Coventina
(27,217 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Igel
(35,383 posts)But probably far, far fewer different people.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Well, not really LOL-
probably at max 5-6k active users...rest are trolls, one time accounts to say fuck you and people changing screen names
mainer
(12,034 posts)I'm not clear what their goal is, if not monetary.
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)use one. If there was a real database it would number 5 or 6 times that. It's so very much more common than all the self-righteous want to think, in a nation of hypocrites. Would be interesting one day for people getting together for sex to not be seen as a object of scorn.
Than again, everyone would have to quit being a closet misogynist and pretend they really do think women can think for themselves to do so, and that they have more to offer than sex.
Phat chance of that.
Skittles
(153,251 posts)Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Ah, Karma....
hughee99
(16,113 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)and how The Gay is going to ruin the country.
Skittles
(153,251 posts)GET WITH THE PROGRAM, WORDPIX
agincourt
(1,996 posts)and don't even use it.
olddots
(10,237 posts)Coventina
(27,217 posts)Never heard of that website before today.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)I'm estimating 30-40% of the accounts are fake anyway
Exultant Democracy
(6,594 posts)Weiner, still a classic.
chloes1
(88 posts)coming soon to a 4chan or reddit near you.
onecaliberal
(32,949 posts)raven mad
(4,940 posts)I think I'll have a cigarette..............