Clinton lays out economic vision, calls out Republican opponents
Source: MSNBC
[img][/img]
KANSAS CITY, Missouri In her most comprehensive remarks on economic policy yet, Hillary Clinton said she would focus squarely on raising middle-class wages and went after her Republican candidates by name. As Republicans call for growing the economy and liberals call for tackling economic inequality, Clinton chose a different tack, saying, The defining economic challenge of our time is clear: We must raise incomes for hard-working Americans.
To do that, she called for increasing the minimum wage, corporate profit-sharing, boosting the power of unions, reducing health-care costs, and expanding the role of women in the economy, among other ideas. She also suggested she would increase taxes on the wealthy and crack down on Wall Street. Clinton, who has so far declined to go after her potential Republican presidential opponents by name, lined up the three top contenders in the GOP field and whacked each one on a different issue emblematic of what she called failed conservative economic polices.
With former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, Clinton called out a comment he made about workers needing to put in longer hours a remark Bushs campaign said was taken out of context. You may have heard Governor Bush say last week that Americans just need to work longer hours. He must not have met very many American workers, she said. Next up was Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, whose corporate tax reform plan she knocked as a giveaway to big business.
Finally, she had especially strong words for Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who announced his candidacy for the presidency today. Republican governors like Scott Walker have made their names stomping on workers rights, she said of his push to crack down on public-sector unions. She called Walkers moves on unions mean-spirited and misguided, and added that We have to get serious about supporting union workers.
Read more: http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/clinton-lays-out-economic-vision-calls-out-republican-opponents
[font size="8"]BOOM![/font]
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)SamKnause
(13,114 posts)Primaries forum ???
I do not trust Hillary.
She has earned my mistrust.
She will say or do anything to get elected.
If she wins, she will not follow through on any
of her promises.
She would not be saying any of these things if
Bernie was not her opponent.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)SamKnause
(13,114 posts)Is that against the rules ?????
and neither are your words.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Can a leopard change its spots
A politician can to win
They say what er you wanna hear
Trying to blend in.
Whats that you say dear voter
You yearn for this and that
Of course, I can deliver
If youre a fattened cat
If you can pac my coffers
Ill do what re you ask
Fear not, my campaign promises
Your needs are my prime task
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)A haiku is five
followed by seven syllables
ending in five more.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)which I do too
What you see, you get
Honest as his hair color
Senator Sanders
wordpix
(18,652 posts)Bernie with white hair
speaks truth to puppet masters
1 percent run hide
wordpix
(18,652 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)to acknowledge that Bernie is on the right track.
How sincere Hillary is about her statements, who she is willing to anger and alienate by acting on her statements remains to be seen.
But I am happy that she is at least following Bernie's lead and speaking out on some of these issues.
I trust Bernie to really insist on putting good policies into place. I think Hillary will give in to the pressure from the oligarchs. They are, after all, her good friends. While Bernie has not bothered quite so much to develop close relationships with the people who, as he says, want to have it all.
I am a strong Bernie fan, but I am happy to see that Hillary is following Bernie's lead.
I think Hillary's support for Bernie's policies is a good.
SamKnause
(13,114 posts)Bernie and co-opting his message.
What kind of a leader does that ???
I don't want to vote for someone who evolves
and copies their opponent.
I want the real deal.
That is Bernie !!!!
FreeState
(10,585 posts)His ideas are not unique, neither are any of the candidates, they did not come up with these concepts on their own nor are they theres.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)Nothing new about Bernie, he has not thought of anything new:
Bernie is trying to steal FDR ideas, which belong to the Dem's:
he was an independent, the Dem were not good enough for him.
Now he wants to lead the party, I say no Thanks
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)You are right that Bernie is bringing back the FDR ideas. They should be the ideas that the Democratic party champions and lives by. But the fact is that most Democrats in Congress and Hillary fall for the charm of money, of the money of a lot of people like Wall Street's Pete Peterson, Hillary's and other politicians' many donors from Wall Street banks and huge corporations -- not ordinary, middle class employees' donations, but big donations from the managers and leaders of those companies whose interests are in some key ways opposed to ours.
So, you are right that Bernie is standing for FDR ideas, for what should be but too often are not the ideas and ideals of the Democratic Party.
And that is why I am supporting Bernie. If it takes an independent person to bring the Democratic Party back to its ideas, back to its ideals, back to its constituents, then I'm going to vote for him. That's Bernie. He will return the Democratic Party to what it should be.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Probably a lot of people here care about it. And the Dem party is a big tent party, you don't win elections by exclusion.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)If your ideas are in sync with the Democratic Party, you are welcome in the big tent. That's my view. And Bernie's are more in sync on a lot of issues than some of our supposedly Democratic members of Congress. So I'm glad he is running as a Democrat.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)Hillary is a team player, and Bernie is an independent
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Have you read Elizabeth Warren's book?
She describes a dinner with Larry Summers in which Larry tells her that if you criticize people in the "in" crowd, you won't be let "in."
I think that attitude and practice, of having an "in" crowd with "team players," those who don't criticize has led the Democratic Party away from its basic values.
One of the concerns of those of us who support Bernie Sanders is that we wonder what team Hillary is really playing for. Is she on the side of ordinary people or on the side of her wealthy donors.
That wasn't such a big issue 30 years ago. But since the 2008 crash, we have become very aware that Wall Street doesn't care about most of us,, that the corporations have been awarded the status of people in terms of our campaign finance and that we have to be very careful about whose team, whose side candidates are on.
Hillary has said some good things in this speech reported above, but she is still indebted, greatly indebted to the interests that fund her campaign, and those interests do not include most of us.
That's yet another reason that I support Bernie.
He is putting his campaign where his mouth is and not taking donations from the oligarchs.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)Bernie always dis the Dem's. Now he wants lead the party, sorry
too little to late.
I want a real Dem,: that's Hillary, she has raised money and campaigned
for her fellow Dem's, : Obama, Senate races, houses races etc,
Bernie, can only credit working for himself and his state only
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)You define the Democratic Party as an organization.
I define the Democratic Party as the representation of certain ideals.
We will never agree.
For me, Bernie Sanders is the true Democrat.
For you, he hasn't paid his dues to the organization.
I think your standard is superficial and irrelevant.
Maybe you think mine is naive and foolish. I'm not sure, but I would be interested to know why you think that the Democratic Party is the organization and not the ideals. Or maybe you think I am wrong in my analysis from the get go.
Anyway, "Democratic Party" means different things to different people.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)The Dem's do represent certain ideals, and Hillary has fought
for them. While Sanders sat in the Senate talking, and refusing
to join the Dem's. Hillary and the Dem put their lives and families
on the line in fight the GOP.
There to no way Sanders is true Dem!!
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)That was a Republican war, and her vote was a Republican vote.
Party labels don't mean much.
I have been very active in my local Democratic Party. Even attended a state convention and have registered many, many voters. I have tabled and worked for Democrats and the Democratic Party.
I am a Democrat. I do not like Hillary. Many of the bills that Bill Clinton signed, like the repeal of Glass-Steagall, welfare reform, the telecomunications act, and many others have hurt our country.
And even now, Hillary has many good ideas that I support, but her stances on breaking up the too big to fail banks and on reinstating a modern Glass-Steagall prevent me from ever voting for her. I saw what the 2008 banking crisis did to famlies I know personally. That would have been prevented had Clinton not gleefully signed the repeal of Glass-Steagall.
I do not think that Hillary has good judgment. She is too quick to go to war. She does not have the wisdom that Bernie Sanders has. Regardless of what party he claims to adhere to, Bernie Sanders is that rare individual who checks his every word and action by a moral standard that is far above the standard that most people have the capacity to apply. Watch his face after he says something meaningful. It is as if he listens carefully to an inner moral voice that tells him whether what he has said was right or wrong. He is a one-of-a-kind opportunity to get good moral leadership in the US. I don't want to us to miss that.
Hillary is a nice lady, but she does not have the kind of moral judgment that Bernie has. Bernie's judgment is a rare gift.
Obama is a wonderful person and he is morally also one who tries to check himself and to do the right thing. But Bernie even surpasses Obama in this respect. That does not mean that Bernie is infallible, but his innate sense of morality really causes him to rise above party labels. Please watch and listen to him more. And I am not saying that Hillary is a bad person. She is a good person. But Bernie is just a person with a rare vision and sense of social morality.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)The Clinton's didn't hurt the country, they had one of the most
successful Presidency in History: The repeal of Glass-Seagull did
not hurt the economy.
The economy crash 8 years after the Clinton's left office, sorry
you cannot hold the Clinton's responsible for GOP policy, any
more than up can hold Obama and the Clinton's for 911.
Hillary does have more moral judgment that Bernie, she didn't
sit in the Senate until she was 73, doing nothing but talking.
Hillary and other Dem's have put their lives and family on the line
to fight the GOP: while Sanders morality has been, talk, talk, talk.
CTBlueboy
(154 posts)Jim Webb is democrat but sure as hell sounds like a confedrate flying segregationist talking about persevering "southern culture"
So rather choose sent Sanders who has (I) by his than Webb who is just seconds away from qouting Bull Connor
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)You and others have an issue with Sen. Sanders for having (I) by name but Jim Webb has that (D) by his name
He could be spouting the same racist venom as Trump but as long he has that (D) by his name is what count since label matter right?
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)SamKnause
(13,114 posts)His message is consistent to a fault.
Hope that helps.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)I don't have time to watch it all.
SamKnause
(13,114 posts)2. The video is from 1989.
Watch the first 10 minutes.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Everyone can stop pretending this is Bernie's idea and only he can discuss it. Hillary was also talking about the wealth gap in 1980s.
LuvLoogie
(7,066 posts)And Eisenhower's support of FDR's policies is good too....
America can't wait until Bernie invents progressive taxation and converts Capitalists, Oligarchs and Plutocrats and the GOP with his authenticity.
Because if it's a good idea, Bernie already thought of it.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)Last edited Mon Jul 13, 2015, 03:33 PM - Edit history (1)
He is offering pie in the sky! He has no tested political skills
pnwmom
(109,021 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Shouldn't this be in the General Discussion:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=1144870
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
No comments added by alerter
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Jul 13, 2015, 02:25 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No comments were provided by the alerter? Is that because this was a cosmically stupid, partisan alert?
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: My first inclination was to leave this post simply because it is a statement of a point of view and no more. But after seeing that the lethargic alertist can't even bother to leave even a brief comment I am now most certainly of the opinion to leave it. Not a doubt in my mind.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I disagree with the post but don't think that it violates DU Community Standards. It seems to be a comment on the OP. Possibly I'm missing something and if so my apologies.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Are we now alerting on opinions?
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Are you kidding me with the alert? Battle on the ideas not on your hyper-sensitivity....
SamKnause
(13,114 posts)This place is a circus.
If people don't want opposing views they should
only post in forums.
Have a great day.
murielm99
(30,780 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)SamKnause
(13,114 posts)into the corporate abyss.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)Hillary, skills are in public service, she has never favored
corporations over people.
She was the one that took on the whole Medical industry:,
Bernie has never been in a national fight against the a corporates,
he has staid in his small state doing nothing.
Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)Her skills are in self-service, not public service. With a strong minor in aggressively covering up her husband's extensive history as a sexual predator.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)Your statements about Bill is right wring trash talking, the GOP
has been attacking the Clinton's like the Obama from the moment
they were elected to help the country.
If there were anything on Bill remotely like a what you are suggesting:
the GOP would have found it. Bill is clean he was investigated
by the GOP, so we know Bill is good man. (not perfect)
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Couldn't be clearer. Kind of sad tho that it needs to be said here.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)Bernie, has sat out all poltical fights until now, he is the one
that has to play catch up.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)For example, was inequality in 2008 just too small to be an issue?
I'm happy she's finally talking about these issues. I'm still waiting for why she didn't in 2000, 2006 or 2008, or why she didn't advance those causes while she was in the Senate.
SamKnause
(13,114 posts)anything to get elected.
After they are elected all bets are off.
They lie their way in and ignore the people
who voted for them because of their lies.
Sad, very sad indeed.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Concrete actions, especially for people with lengthy track records, show what a candidate really believed.
They can, of course, change their opinion. But I'm going to find it hard to believe the change without some specific information about what changed.
For example, Clinton could say "I thought the 90's boom would come back when a Republican wasn't in the White House." And that would explain why she didn't talk about it previously. (It's a poor explanation, and very unlikely to be what she believes. It's just a sample off the top of my head)
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)I wonder if she will be able "evolve" her friends at the Peterson Institute too.
I don't see anything about improving Social Security benefits on her list.
I don't see anything about free college tuition for students. Just wait. She will be on the Bernie bandwagon totally before you know it. She is opportunistic enough to recognize where the wind is blowing.
And the wind is blowing Bernie to the top of the polls. It's just a matter of time.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Outraged at CEO compensation[In Bills cabinet, Labor Secretary] Robert Reich was gladdened by Hillarys passionate condemnation of corporate-executive compensation. These are real issues, Bill, she said, pointing out that the average CEO of a big company is now earning 200 times the average hourly wage. Twenty years ago the ratio was about forty times. People all over this country are really upset about this.-HRC 2006
The pension system is broken. Weve got to stop companies going into bankruptcy in order to get rid of their pension responsibilities. We have to have defined benefits pension plans again. When I am president, well have a Department of Labor that actually cares about labor.-HRC 2007
Lets finally do something about the growing economic inequality that is tearing our country apart. The top 1% of our households hold 22% of our nations wealth. That is the highest concentration of wealth in a very small number of people since 1929. So lets close that gap. Lets start holding corporate America responsible, make them pay their fair share again. Enough with the corporate welfare. Enough with the golden parachutes. And enough with the tax incentives for companies to shift jobs overseas.-HRC 2007
In the 1980s, Hillary Clinton had overheard a conversation between her husband and a Japanese executive. "You could do a lot to stimulate your economy," the executive told Clinton, "if your executives in American industry weren't so greedy." Her husband replied that American executives were being given permission to grab the most at the top by Reagan economic policies, which were designed so wealth would allegedly trickle down to those at the bottom. But those at the bottom weren't seeing the benefits. Hillary agreed. She was angry at what she called "the unacceptable acquiescence in greed that had occurred during the 1980s."-HRC 1996
Voted YES on repealing tax subsidy for companies which move US jobs offshore.Amendment to repeal the tax subsidy for certain domestic companies which move manufacturing operations and American jobs offshore.-HRC 2005
Close lobbyists revolving door; end no-bid contractsI believe that the foundation of a strong economy doesnt begin with giving people who are already privileged and wealthy even more benefits. I think it comes from shared prosperity.
Lets start by cleaning up the government, replacing this culture of corruption and cronyism with a culture of competence and caring again. Lets stop outsourcing critical government functions to private companies that overcharge and underperform! Lets close the revolving door between government and the lobbying shop, and lets end the no-bid contracts for Halliburton and the other well-connected companies!
And how about the radical idea of appointing people who are actually qualified for the positions that we ask them to hold for us! Well, when Im president, the entrance to the White House will no longer be a revolving door for the well connected, but a door of opportunity for the well qualified.-HRC 2007
You get the point.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Let's go through your list and pull out the ones that are not a speech or similar comment.
Doesn't look quite as much as a laundry list.
Where were her bills to do everything else in those quotes?
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)He's actually managed to push through several veterans-related bills in the last few years. Even with the crazy Republicans in Congress.
Again, where are Clinton's bills to address any of those quotes? If those are her deeply-held beliefs, surely she would have proposed legislation to address them. Even if it can't pass, it can alter the debate.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Interested, you can look them all up.
Keep-Left
(66 posts)I love Hillary and Sanders. Whoever wins gets my vote!
I know Hillary is well connected but I also believe she has been fighting for the middleclass her whole life. Both would make great Presidents. I know Sanders is more left and I agree with him more but I have no problems with Hillary and would love to see the first women President.
And one more thing. Hillary is a good Dem. When Obama won she gave a great speech for the party to bring everyone back together.
lark
(23,182 posts)Indeed.
uwep
(108 posts)If you cannot say anything nice, don't say anything at all. Hillary has worked hard all her life and has specifically worked for women's and children's issues. She has been ridiculed and disparaged most of her political career. Even when she ran against Obama, I do not remember her being savaged as is being done here on DU. The Sanders supporters cry every now and then when he is criticized and ban anyone who does not support him.
My belief is that we have trolls that are doing their best to get Sanders nominated because they believe he can be beaten in the national election, where Hillary cannot.
Sanders is firing up the liberal base with his rhetoric, but when the time comes and if he is elected, he will be in the same position as both Bill Clinton and Barack Obama where in. As soon as he makes an effort to implement all of his agenda, the Republicans will do the same as they did to previous Democratic Presidents. Anyway, I still believe that Sanders is not a Democrat. I have seen nothing but an independent. Sanders needs to stay in the Senate where he can provide the support. We cannot lose another seat, even if it is an independent.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)bans also. Go figure
kath
(10,565 posts)believe he can be beaten in the national election, where Hillary cannot."
Ohmygod. Conspiracy theorist much?
Or denial?
Or WHAT??
Shaking. My. Head.
That's a nice story. Who was the author again?
kath
(10,565 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)Poor, poor Hillary and her $200,000 speaking fee's. So abused.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)I haven't posted on one story about Sen Sanders where it wasn't a positive comment but have been on dozens of Hillary threads that Bernie supporters continue to trash not only Hillary, but her supporters. It's on this one now. The worst thing about Sen Sanders is his supporters who are some of the nastiest posters this site has ever had. Sick of every single one of them and are making this site unbearable.
brooklynite
(94,911 posts)...because I see the difference between a handful of anonymous posters on an internet blog, and the millions of Democrats in the real world who see her a both a solid advocate for mainstream Democratic principles and a well-prepared candidate who's able to take on any of the Republican candidates.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)they behave like trolls and they've taken control of this board. I happen to agree with you on the support for Hillary. I don't personally know one person who thinks Bernie can win the general - in fact, they ALWAYS mention McGovern.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)murielm99
(30,780 posts)Stay out of their playpen.
When HRC wins the nomination, they will go away again, or get banned. Look at the posting history of many of them. They only show up during primaries, then they go dormant. They are only here to stir shit, and there is plenty to stir this time.
Once she is the nominee, anyone who says they will not vote for Hillary in the general, will vote third party or repubbie, does not belong here. I don't think they should be here now, but that is not up to me. I have voted for and worked for many Democratic candidates when I had reservations!
Stay strong. They only control the board if we let them. Not all of them are Democrats. Remember that, too.
BlueMTexpat
(15,374 posts)when the trashing is OTT.
I am sure that Bernie himself would not countenance their nastiness. They seem to forget that - or perhaps they never really understood it - or him - in the first place.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,178 posts)Those millions of Democrats do see her as their champion and will vote for her. And they outnumber Sander's supporters on some news message board.
Lets face it, even studies have shown that Democrats are more likely to be better educated, more empathetic, among other things, than their Republican counterparts. They can recognize that Hillary is the obvious choice if it is between her and any clown in the clown car. But even though they are better informed than the vote-against-our-best-interests crowd, most voters, (of either stripe) have busy lives and get their news clips from headlines and a minimal time digging deeper.
People who join DU and other political forums, are more invested in the political discourse of the country. They spend more time investigating and digging. So......IMO......my take is that you have an extra-ordinary percent of Bernie supporters in here as compared to the general Democratic registrars, because we in DU are that much better informed and most here have a more intimate knowledge of both candidates voting records, donors, and past positions and how those positions affect the country. Sorry if that sounds insulting.
Beacool
(30,253 posts)My solution is to dismiss the nastiness and not come to this site too often. That way I avoid getting too riled up and ticked off by the perpetual negativity.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)I would never let them bring me down. With all the nastiness they spread around here about Hillary, I find it amusing they're whining about being called Bernistas on another thread. They have zero self awareness.
Beacool
(30,253 posts)I don't mean those about policy differences, that's fair. I mean the ones that are personal and nasty. When it comes to the Clintons, sometimes it's hard to differentiate this site from any RW site. That's when I tune them out. Although, on occasion I do respond.
calimary
(81,565 posts)Eve ate the apple forcryingoutloud.
Some of the same people also diss President Obama when he gets a hangnail they don't like.
I try not to respond. I try. And sometimes I succeed!
It's just not worth it to keep arguing. Besides, I've not seen it sway any of the true believers on the Bernie team.
Life is too short. And I value my low blood pressure. Kinda like to keep it that way.
murielm99
(30,780 posts)We have to know more details about Hillary's history, plans and platform to answer them.
Of course, no answer is good enough for them. But we learn more about our candidate and ourselves.
You will find, when you go out to work for Hillary IRL, now or later, that it is not like this. The two groups of supporters do not treat each other like children on a playground.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)panfluteman
(2,075 posts)Hillary is being schooled or "evolved" in her campaign rhetoric by Bernie Sanders - there's no doubt about that. But campaign rhetoric is only talk, and is often - maybe even usually - abandoned once the candidate gets into office.
To know how the candidate will govern, and which policies he or she will implement once in office, you have to follow the money. You have to see who their biggest campaign donors are. And in Hillary's case, the big Wall Street firms are right up there at the top of her donor list. So, when Hillary talks about reining in Wall Street, how could she ever do that in any real and meaningful way? Would she bite the hand that feeds her? This is definitely a case of saying anything to get elected, in my humble and realistic opinion.
Nevertheless, Hillary has worked hard and done a lot of admirable work for many fine causes during her political career, and would bring a lot of fine qualities, competence and experience to the Oval Office if she is elected president. And if the general election came down to Hillary versus Jeb or any one of the other Republican "clown car" candidates, I would vote for Hillary in a heartbeat.
But I would never, ever expect her to really rein in Wall Street.
erronis
(15,429 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)EVER rein in that runaway Wall Street team of horses supporting her.
Locrian
(4,522 posts)I think she has a lot of good ideas, and her heart is in the right place vs the GOP clowns.
I just feel she cannot think outside the corporate / wallstreet way of solving problems. It's too ingrained and too difficult to break free from.
But I too say: If the general election came down to Hillary versus Jeb or any one of the other Republican "clown car" candidates, I would vote for Hillary in a heartbeat.
SunSeeker
(51,787 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)1. Shut up, don't answer questions.
2. See what the other candidate says that resonates.
3. Say "me too."
4. Smile and wave.
Deliver in a speech pattern reminiscent of the robot on "Lost in Space".
how can anyone be blind to this? also remember that she has to mimic to accent of those she is speaking to so she can sound familiar.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)No original thought needed. Just blindly support whoever has the correct letter next to their name. Campaigns like hers don't WANT thinkers, they want minions who will agree with everything she says and never ask questions.
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Today Hillary Clinton began to offer the kind of comprehensive approach we need to tackle the enormous economic challenges we face, one that is squarely in line with what we have called for at the Roosevelt Institute, he said of the progressive think tank where he serves as chief economist.
Somebody's about to go under the bus!
silenttigersong
(957 posts)is a far cry from tackling the economic issues.The debates shall begin to get interesting.Who are you refering to _going under the bus?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)who has advised Clinton on economics and issued a "strong endorsement."
silenttigersong
(957 posts)havent seen that ahh but I guess I will have to wait for the" BOOM"from DUs team Clinton.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)Bernie supports coops and a $15 minimum wage.
HRC proposes profit sharing in return for tax cuts.
Considering that many companies use accountants,
who can minimize the profit, it means mainly
tax cuts for the corporations again.
Did I get this wrong?
SamKnause
(13,114 posts)d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)Why give corporations more tax breaks in order for them to shell out a few bucks to their employees? This is as corportists as it gets. How many people do you know that work for corporations? The last company I worked for did not have profit sharing since it was a small business. This coprorate boot licking has to end! Stop their monopolies! Encourage competition! Close the tax loopholes!
Let's hear sensible answers instead of concessions that work with the current system that makes the corporates rich and buries the rest of us.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)HRC's economic policy speech was delivered in NYC; apparently it's Sanders who is in KC:
Hillary:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/07/13/us-usa-election-clinton-idUSKCN0PN0FA20150713
Bernie:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/sanders-says-us-immigration-policies-should-unite-families/2015/07/13/ee6796ea-2981-11e5-960f-22c4ba982ed4_story.html
Beacool
(30,253 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)Beacool
(30,253 posts)If "Wall Streeters" were aliens. The Ferengis would sell their soul for gold pressed latinum.
The Ferengi's Rules of Acquisition.
http://www.sjtrek.com/trek/rules/
Keep-Left
(66 posts)SleeplessinSoCal
(9,174 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)And that's they way they make money instead of their paycheck.
Gloria
(17,663 posts)people who have most of their savings in company stock get wiped out...
That has happened many times....
So, people have to try to diversify their holdings and get savvy
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Oh sure,....next thing you'll claim is that real estate values can drop.
ibewlu606
(160 posts)Why can't people who ought to know better just see Clinton for what she is? And I used to think Teabaggers were willfully ignorant.
http://thehill.com/policy/finance/247700-adviser-clinton-wont-push-glass-steagall-bank-bill
BainsBane
(53,112 posts)completely detached from actual positions on policy or voting record. Yet people who actually pay attention to that are the ones who are ignorant, whereas you just know. Naturally anyone who disagrees with you in anyway is as ignorant as a teabagger because your views are the source of absolute truth in the universe. Anyone whose life experiences or views in anyway depart from yours is "ignorant." Why listen to Clinton at all when we can just go straight to you to learn all about her? Why even have a campaign, when anonymous detractors on the internet already know everything there is to possibly know?
BainsBane
(53,112 posts)as evidenced by your opposition to a Democratic candidate, perhaps you can explain to me what will happen with all the companies that have been formed since Glass-Steagall was repealed? Will they be dissolved? Is that constitutional? What will happen to the people who work for those firms, numbers I would guess range in the hundreds of thousands if not more?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)dballance
(5,756 posts)And not just pandering for votes.
Gothmog
(145,794 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)I thought she was going to run an honest campaign - "I'm aligned with the republicans on every economic issue, but won't take away abortion rights. Also as of 2008 or so I'm OK with gay marriage". Instead she's going to pretend to be a liberal, like Obama in 2008. Not very many people will be fooled.
William769
(55,148 posts)Cha
(297,935 posts)raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)Not sure a President has the power to do that but I'd like to hear more.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)It was appalling to hear Donald Trump describe immigrants as drug dealers, racists and criminals, Clinton said. Hes talking about people you and I know. Hes talking about people who love this country, work hard and want nothing more than a chance to build a better life for themselves and this country.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251442966