Judge not: GOP blocks dozens of Obama court picks
Source: Politico
The GOP-controlled Senate is on track this year to confirm the fewest judges since 1969, a dramatic escalation of the long-running partisan feud over the ideological makeup of federal courts.
The standoff, if it continues through the 2016 elections as expected, could diminish the stamp that President Barack Obama leaves on the judiciary a less conspicuous but critical part of his legacy. Practically, the makeup of lower-level courts could directly affect a number of Obamas policies expected to face legal challenges from conservatives.
Republicans appear willing to absorb criticism that theyre interfering with the prerogative of a president to pick his nominees in the hope that the GOP can get its own judges installed in 2017, with one of their own in the White House. In the meantime, federal courts could be left with dozens of unfilled vacancies. More than two dozen federal courts have declared judicial emergencies because of excessive caseloads caused by vacancies.
Senate Democrats infuriated Republicans in November 2013 by scrapping the 60-vote filibuster rule for judicial nominations a change Obama and then-Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) used to usher through 96 judicial nominations.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/payback-gop-blocks-obama-judge-picks-judiciary-119743.html
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)totodeinhere
(13,059 posts)hands but sadly it didn't happen.
MurrayDelph
(5,302 posts)[Pui-pui-pui]
if there is EVER a delay with judicial nominations, the Republicans will start whining "every name deserves an Up-or-Down vote."
media will gleefully advance that meme, the dems will fold ...
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)I guess to unclog the short-handed judiciary, the federal government will just have to drop all charges in pending non-violent drug cases.