Wikileaks: US 'routinely spied' on Brazil
Source: BBC News
Wikileaks: US 'routinely spied' on Brazil
1 hour ago
The Wikileaks website says it has evidence that a number of senior Brazilian government officials were routinely spied on by the National Security Agency in the United States. It says the NSA was particularly active in economic espionage against Brazil.
Wikileaks published a list of 29 phone numbers of Brazilians in banking, finance and the economy.
According to the website the espionage apparently began in early 2011 or even earlier.
President Dilma Rousseff cancelled a state visit to Washington two years ago when former CIA contractor Edward Snowden revealed that her phones and emails were being spied on.
Read more: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-33398388
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)I think they'd have to be more insulted that we didn't think it worth our time to do so. It's becoming obvious that we spied on friend and foe alike, as long as we thought it was worth so doing.
cstanleytech
(26,339 posts)The US, Russia and China are just the 3 who probably do the majority of it.
elfin
(6,262 posts)Knowledge is Power. The U.S., China, Russia etc. know that aphorism and have an insatiable hunger to know all. Whether or not they can decipher it or react to bad news in time.
With us to stay.
Someone like Bernie could issue an Exec. Order to scale it back, but this crap now has a life of its own. Thanks Dubya.
As a Wisconsinite, I am nearly crazed at this point to get Russ ("No!" To the P.A.) back in the Senate.
Judi Lynn
(160,655 posts)joshcryer
(62,279 posts)Leontius
(2,270 posts)malthaussen
(17,219 posts)Our spooks would not be doing their jobs if we were not.
-- Mal
reorg
(3,317 posts)Once again the revelations make clear that the main target of the National "Security" Assholes' data theft is 'officials responsible for ... financial and economic matters' as well as major companies like Petrobras.
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/07/04/nsa-top-brazilian-political-and-financial-targets-wikileaks/
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)How can they look in the mirror?
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Instead, our alliances crumble, our global partners seek new friends, and the People are inflamed to rebel...
shades of 1776!
cstanleytech
(26,339 posts)our governments intelligence gathering so of course anything I would say on its ability to yield fruit would just be an uninformed opinion
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Which pretty much fits the pattern of the past two years...Why am I not surprised?
Some "transparency"
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Among others. You wish it was a non-story.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)In fact, I WANT our leaders to have all the info they need in conducting foreign policy.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)Brazil spied on us. Every spies on everyone
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)China maybe?
We need international protocols, agreements and punishments for this kind of personal spying.
joshcryer
(62,279 posts)Brazils Institutional Security Cabinet, which oversees the nations intelligence activities, contended in a statement on Monday that the spying operations, involving relatively basic surveillance about a decade ago of diplomats and diplomatic properties in Brazil, were in absolute compliance with legislation governing such practices.
The statement followed a report in the newspaper Folha de São Paulo describing how the Brazilian Intelligence Agency, commonly known as Abin, had followed some diplomats from Russia and Iran on foot and by car, photographing their movements, while also monitoring a commercial property leased by the United States Embassy in Brasília, the capital.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/05/world/americas/brazil-acknowledges-spying-on-diplomats-from-us.html
Everyone does it, when they get caught, they complain. If Brazil had the same resources the US does you can bet your bottom dollar that they'd use those resources. Abin in particular has its hands in everything in Latin America.
The questions shouldn't be about whether anyone is spying on anyone, the question should be about effectiveness, and there's zero evidence that these spying programs have stopped terrorism. It's more about industrial sabotage and trade than it is anything else. Terribly unethical, but it is what it is.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Friends, enemies, neutrals, and its own citizens.
brooklynite
(94,808 posts)brooklynite
(94,808 posts)Governments spy on each other.
Do you imagine that President Sanders is going to decommission the CIA?
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Are the secrets being kept from the other countries or are the secrets being kept from us?
If we know there is so much spying going on, why do we bother to try to keep so many secrets? It's futile.
Or maybe there isn't really all that much spying going on. Rather, maybe, we tell ourselves there is so much spying going on in order to rationalize the fact that we are overly nosy about what is going on in the economies of other countries.
We have been caught spying on finance ministers, companies, etc., not on military installations. It makes sense to spy on military installations. Why are we spying on economic institutions and companies?
brooklynite
(94,808 posts)We spy on Governments, they try to keep us from finding things out; and vice versa...
brooklynite
(94,808 posts)...yes, it's useful to know what their military capabilities are; it's also useful to know their economic situation what what impact their business practices may have on us.
I'll reframe my question; do you imagine that President Sanders will release every Government secret for your perusal?
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)But I think he will take a very reasonable approach to the intelligence gathering that we do. I think that because he takes a reasonable approach to pretty much everything.
He is on the budget committee. He probably has a pretty good idea about where we could save money if we approached the size and scope of our government so as to benefit the American people and let multinational corporations that do everything they can to avoid paying American taxes on their profits do their own economic espionage.
I think we should be asking what we are getting, we the American people, for our espionage dollars.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Too bad Sanders will never be POTUS so he can create "disappointment" when he handles the CIA.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)MTJ
(4 posts)I mean haven't they spied on pretty much EVERYONE?!