Ohio House again passes "heartbeat" anti-abortion bill
Source: Reuters
Ohio House again passes "heartbeat" anti-abortion bill
Source: Reuters - Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:24 GMT
By Kim Palmer
CLEVELAND, March 25 (Reuters) - The Ohio House of Representatives on Wednesday again passed a bill that would outlaw abortions once a fetal heartbeat can be detected, or at about six weeks, but it is not expected to become law.
A heartbeat bill previously passed the Republican-controlled House in 2011, only to die in the Republican-led Senate. The bill is opposed by Governor John Kasich, also a Republican, along with some anti-abortion activists, who think it would be unconstitutional.
The House vote on Wednesday was 55-40. There are no exceptions for rape or incest. Similar legislation was introduced in the House in 2013, but it failed a floor vote in 2014.
"With the passage of HB 69, Ohio Republicans have shown they'll stop at nothing in their quest to deny women their rights, no matter how dangerous their efforts may be," said Ohio State Representative Kathy DiCristofaro, chair of the Democratic Women's Caucus.
Read more: http://www.trust.org/item/20150325212456-grs96/
Judi Lynn
(160,661 posts)Ohio anti-abortion 'heartbeat bill' passes in house but likely to face opposition
Abortion banned after first sign of fetal heartbeat at six weeks, legislation says
Pro-choice groups: bill would essentially outlaw abortion in state
Sabrina Siddiqui in New York
@SabrinaSiddiqui
Wednesday 25 March 2015 17.12 EDT Last modified on Wednesday 25 March
State representatives in Ohio on Wednesday passed legislation that would ban abortions once a fetal heartbeat can be detected, which usually occurs at six weeks of pregnancy.
The 55-40 vote marked the third time the Ohio house has sought to advance the so-called heartbeat bill, which makes no exceptions for victims of rape or incest. The language further states that physicians who violate the ban would be guilty of a fifth-degree felony, punishable by up to a year in prison and a $2,500 fine. The bill is unlikely to go any further, facing stiff opposition in the senate as well as from John Kasich, the Republican governor of Ohio.
Kasich and pro-life groups such as Right to Life have expressed concerns that the heartbeat bill is unconstitutional and could result in litigation that might result in a federal judge easing existing restrictions on abortions. The Ohio senate president, Republican Keith Faber, is also opposed to the legislation, making its prospects even more dim.
Abortion rights groups have pointed out that many women do not even know they are pregnant at six weeks. The bill would essentially outlaw abortion in the state of Ohio, they argued.
More:'http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/mar/25/ohio-anti-abortion-heartbeat-bill-passes-house
uppityperson
(115,681 posts)abortions available only to rich and famous.
But seriously, what is it with the heart beating? Why should that make any difference beyond some arbitrary limitation.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Eventually if they keep making progress, they win.
uppityperson
(115,681 posts)Larry Engels
(387 posts)They start around day 40. That would be more scientific-seeming. Also more consonant with the flat brain-wave criterion for death.
But then, this isn't about science, is it?
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)Imagine the lives saved.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)And welcome to DU!
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)mpcamb
(2,880 posts)in state legislature deciding what women ought to do?
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)It's the gods we need to get rid of if we ever want a sane country.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I think it is dead. Really what is next, a woman can't go to the bathroom after sex because she might kill the sperm that could potentially lead to a child??? Unreal.............
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)a heartbeat? Well then, I guess it's time for a new election!