Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

irisblue

(33,040 posts)
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 03:47 PM Dec 2017

Incompetent Judicial nominee Matthew Petersen withdraws from consideration

From Buzzfeed.com today.....A Trump Judicial Nominee Who Struggled To Answer Basic Legal Questions Has Withdrawn His Nomination
Matthew Petersen, a member of the Federal Election Commission, is now Trump's third unsuccessful judicial nominee.
SNIP
Matthew Petersen, a member of the Federal Election Commission, was nominated for the US District Court for the District of Columbia. Less than a week after his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, when he struggled to answer basic questions about court procedure and the law, he withdrew his nomination and the president accepted the withdrawal, a White House official told BuzzFeed News.
SNIP
***cough bullpucky***
Petersen wrote that his nomination had become a "distraction" to the administration.

"I had hoped that my nearly two decades of public service might carry more weight than my two worst minutes on television," Petersen wrote. "However, I am no stranger to political realities, and I do not wish to be a continued distraction from the important work of your administration and the Senate." SNIP

Incompetent jerk got busted in public by a republican senator.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Incompetent Judicial nominee Matthew Petersen withdraws from consideration (Original Post) irisblue Dec 2017 OP
Two decades of what service, exactly? Certainly nothing legal-wise. kysrsoze Dec 2017 #1
Trump will find someone just as incompetent to take his place. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 2017 #2
His FEC bio page... irisblue Dec 2017 #3
Maybe he could fill in for Judge Judy on daytime TV Fritz Walter Dec 2017 #4

irisblue

(33,040 posts)
3. His FEC bio page...
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 04:18 PM
Dec 2017

I suspect he was a republican legacy pass along this guy.....
Matthew S. Petersen was nominated to the Federal Election Commission by President George W. Bush on June 12, 2008, and unanimously confirmed by the United States Senate on June 24, 2008.

From 2005 until his appointment to the Commission, Mr. Petersen served as Republican chief counsel to the U.S. Senate Committee on Rules and Administration. In this capacity, Mr. Petersen provided counsel on issues relating to federal campaign finance and election administration laws as well as the Standing Rules of the Senate.
Prior to this, Mr. Petersen served as counsel to the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on House Administration. During his tenure, Mr. Petersen was extensively involved in the crafting of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 ("HAVA&quot and the House-Senate negotiations that culminated in HAVA's passage. From 1999 to 2002, Mr. Petersen specialized in election and campaign finance law at the law firm of Wiley Rein LLP in Washington, DC.
Mr. Petersen received his J.D. in 1999 from the University of Virginia School of Law, where he was a member of the Virginia Law Review. He graduated magna cum laude with a B.A. in philosophy from Brigham Young University in 1996. He also received an A.S. with high honors from Utah Valley State College.

A gift to Orrin Hatch? Still amusing to me a republican senator rolled over him. It was embarrassing to listen to him being questioned at hie hearing.

Fritz Walter

(4,292 posts)
4. Maybe he could fill in for Judge Judy on daytime TV
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 04:29 PM
Dec 2017

When he told Sen. Kennedy he was “involved” in taking depositions, my first thought was that his involvement was getting coffee for the witness and the real lawyers.

Bye Felicia!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Incompetent Judicial nomi...