Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,716 posts)
Mon Dec 4, 2017, 10:09 AM Dec 2017

"The president can't obstruct justice..." - John Dowd

Is there a lawyer in the land outside of Alan Dershowitz and Donald Trump's team of consiglieres who buys that argument ? The executive's right to fire departmental heads is virtually absolute but not absolute. The president can fire a departmental head for any legal reason. He can't fire him or her with a corrupt intent. An act that can be lawful in one instance can be unlawful in another.

It would have been a breach of protocol but not unlawful if he fired Comey and replaced him with someone he liked as the FBI Chief is supposed to be independent. If he fired Comey because he was investigating his pal, Michael Flynn, and that investigation presumably would extend to him that would be unlawful and an obstruction of justice.




P.S. I remember reading the Dowd Report on Pete Rose and coming away thinking Rose was a scoundrel. Now that I see what kind of man John Dowd is I am re-evaluating my opinion of Pete Rose.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"The president can't obstruct justice..." - John Dowd (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Dec 2017 OP
In other words, the President is above the law. kentuck Dec 2017 #1
according to trump's lawyer, TRUMP IS KING spanone Dec 2017 #2
that was nixon's theory. it didn't play out very well for him. unblock Dec 2017 #3
"The trouble with the French is they have no phrase for 'the state is me'" muriel_volestrangler Dec 2017 #4
"Apres nous le deluge." DemocratSinceBirth Dec 2017 #6
Is that a quote from a couple of Russian hookers? muriel_volestrangler Dec 2017 #11
Last gasp hail mary attempt to fend off the inevitable. honest.abe Dec 2017 #5
How Nixonian of him Dread Pirate Roberts Dec 2017 #7
I seem to remember that Dowd, 25 years later, suddenly announced that he had evidence at the time StevieM Dec 2017 #8
Maybe he mixed up Pete with his current client ? DemocratSinceBirth Dec 2017 #9
If that precedent stands, then woe be to Republicans Mr. Ected Dec 2017 #10

unblock

(52,399 posts)
3. that was nixon's theory. it didn't play out very well for him.
Mon Dec 4, 2017, 10:12 AM
Dec 2017

but there were even then people who insisted nixon was right and their number has only multiplied.

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
8. I seem to remember that Dowd, 25 years later, suddenly announced that he had evidence at the time
Mon Dec 4, 2017, 10:46 AM
Dec 2017

that Pete Rose was guilty of having sex with 12 year olds.

I think there is still an ongoing lawsuit over the matter.

Mr. Ected

(9,674 posts)
10. If that precedent stands, then woe be to Republicans
Mon Dec 4, 2017, 10:48 AM
Dec 2017

When next a Democrat assumes the Oval Office.

These things cut both ways, you idiots.

I wonder if Bob Mueller chuckles every time he tightens the vice and Trump's pivots paint him more and more deeply in a corner.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"The president can't obst...