Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Siwsan

(26,309 posts)
Sun Dec 3, 2017, 01:19 PM Dec 2017

If they start reducing Social Security payments, will that affect those currently collecting?

I can't even begin to imagine what would happen to people who are struggling to survive on what they are getting, now, if those benefits would be cut by ANY amount. I know the program wasn't designed to be the only retirement income, but let's face it - for some, that's just about all that is coming in.

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If they start reducing Social Security payments, will that affect those currently collecting? (Original Post) Siwsan Dec 2017 OP
It hasn't in the past, but... Wounded Bear Dec 2017 #1
I have a lot of friends who will be working until they drop Siwsan Dec 2017 #6
Third rail greeny2323 Dec 2017 #2
That - plus higher Medicare premiums. sandensea Dec 2017 #3
Social Security is the ONLY source of income for millions. Eyeball_Kid Dec 2017 #4
The gop is like a pit bull with a bone, the bone being social programs. shraby Dec 2017 #5
A sure fire way to tank the economy Mme. Defarge Dec 2017 #7
I am one of those people. I rely solely on my SSDI, medicare/medicade, and subsidized housing. Doreen Dec 2017 #8
If that's what the law says, yes. Igel Dec 2017 #9
I'm 71 and on S.S. left-of-center2012 Dec 2017 #10
? Skittles Dec 2017 #15
Right? MrsCoffee Dec 2017 #18
Yes, of course. left-of-center2012 Dec 2017 #19
In the past, any social security changes have only applied Yupster Dec 2017 #11
My plan was to hold off on collecting for as long as possible Siwsan Dec 2017 #12
If there's a local social security office near you, you can visit them Yupster Dec 2017 #14
There is one, close by Siwsan Dec 2017 #16
I hope we don't find out. JustABozoOnThisBus Dec 2017 #13
They voted for this shit. LeftyMom Dec 2017 #17

Wounded Bear

(58,755 posts)
1. It hasn't in the past, but...
Sun Dec 3, 2017, 01:24 PM
Dec 2017

you can't put anything past these guys. I live on my SS payments. The last two annual increases were gone before they occured, offset by rent increases and basic inflation of gas and food prices.

I get my healthcare from VA, and they are fucking with that, too.

Siwsan

(26,309 posts)
6. I have a lot of friends who will be working until they drop
Sun Dec 3, 2017, 01:40 PM
Dec 2017

Some due to being irresponsible, but others due to unforeseen circumstances and outlandish medical expenses that made it necessary to borrow against their 401K accounts, and now they have to work to repay.

I've always been healthy, VERY low maintenance and a dedicated money saver so I'm ok, financially, but I worry deeply about my niece and nephew's future, and that of their kids. Any money I can put away will go to help them, now and when I'm gone.


 

greeny2323

(590 posts)
2. Third rail
Sun Dec 3, 2017, 01:25 PM
Dec 2017

I can't imagine they'd be stupid enough to cut actual checks going out today. They will do what they always do: Lie through their fucking teeth while they completely undermine the program.

I'd be interested to hear from those knowledgeable about what they could do through reconciliation (so they only need 50 votes).

sandensea

(21,692 posts)
3. That - plus higher Medicare premiums.
Sun Dec 3, 2017, 01:26 PM
Dec 2017

I'd be surprised if they start reducing the benefits themselves (though maybe I shouldn't be) - initially, at least.

In all likelihood they'll enact a near-freeze that lasts for years, with the goal of eventually privatizing Social Security.

Then the benefits will start being reduced. I pray it never comes to pass; but that is the GOP goal.

Eyeball_Kid

(7,437 posts)
4. Social Security is the ONLY source of income for millions.
Sun Dec 3, 2017, 01:26 PM
Dec 2017

And for them, there's a thin line between eating food from the grocers and eating food from dumpsters.

shraby

(21,946 posts)
5. The gop is like a pit bull with a bone, the bone being social programs.
Sun Dec 3, 2017, 01:29 PM
Dec 2017

They won't quit if it takes another 70 years until it's all gone.
Hate is a powerful thing and they have hated the programs since they were being formed.

Only proves more that the gop needs to be eliminated and a sane and rational party formed to take its place.

Doreen

(11,686 posts)
8. I am one of those people. I rely solely on my SSDI, medicare/medicade, and subsidized housing.
Sun Dec 3, 2017, 01:45 PM
Dec 2017

All of those are in danger and I am not able to work. I am pretty scared. I should probably not complain because there are a whole lot of people who are going to be worse off even if we both become homeless.

Igel

(35,382 posts)
9. If that's what the law says, yes.
Sun Dec 3, 2017, 03:41 PM
Dec 2017

But there's no such law yet. The tax bills as formulated aren't relevant to Social Security.

Current income for the SSA is roughly equal to income. That's expected to shift in the next few years to expenses becoming greater than income, at which point the general fund will have to pay back the special-issue Treasure notes that the SSA holds. How they handle that in Congress is a bit of a guess; mostly likely, though, they'll just issue more publicly held Treasury bills and only refer to the national debt in ways that obscures the change.

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
10. I'm 71 and on S.S.
Sun Dec 3, 2017, 04:06 PM
Dec 2017

Last edited Sun Dec 3, 2017, 08:55 PM - Edit history (1)

I pray Congress leaves Social Security, Medicare, and me alone for eternity.

(edited to please - I shall say no more)

more

No!
You said you'd say --> "no" more !

Well, OK then ! No more.

wink wink

A basketful ( a HUGE basket) for any offended by my original wording.


Yupster

(14,308 posts)
11. In the past, any social security changes have only applied
Sun Dec 3, 2017, 04:40 PM
Dec 2017

to people less than 50 years old and even those changes were phased in applying in full to only new enrolees. For instance when they raised the retirement age from 65 to 67 back in 1986, that change still isn't totally phased in. People retiring now have something like 66 and 3 months as their full retirement age. I'll reach my full age at 66 and 10 months in about six more years.

Of course that's the past. Congress can do anything it wants pretty much.

Siwsan

(26,309 posts)
12. My plan was to hold off on collecting for as long as possible
Sun Dec 3, 2017, 05:12 PM
Dec 2017

I have a meeting with my financial planner, tomorrow. At last year's meeting she told me it was hardly worth it to wait much later than age 65, which I thought strange since retirement age is 66.

After paying into the program for my entire working career, I always figured that money would be there when I needed it.

If threatening to destroy this program, that people are STILL paying into, doesn't create a voting backlash against the GOP, then there is no hope for this country to survive.

Yupster

(14,308 posts)
14. If there's a local social security office near you, you can visit them
Sun Dec 3, 2017, 05:50 PM
Dec 2017

They are very well informed on your choices and advantages and disadvantages of each.

Some financial advisers are more informed on the program than others. There are so many what-ifs. If you have a spouse that will get half of yours instead of theirs, it doesn't make sense to delay past 66. There are so many what ifs involved, it's best to go directtly to social security if there's an office nearby.

Siwsan

(26,309 posts)
16. There is one, close by
Sun Dec 3, 2017, 06:10 PM
Dec 2017

I'll see how I feel after tomorrow's meeting. I've been holding off on taking any dividends from my retirement investment account, so once I see what I can responsibly 'withdraw', I'll have a better idea if I can hold off.

It's just me, but I am now the 'stand-in' Mom for my late sister's kids. I want to be in a position to be able to help them, financially, should they need it, and hopefully be able to set up some sort of a trust fund for my grand-niece.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,375 posts)
13. I hope we don't find out.
Sun Dec 3, 2017, 05:47 PM
Dec 2017

I hope we can fight and defeat any attack on SS, Medicare, Medicaid, V.A.

If the Repubs kill SS for younger people and leave elders untouched, that will split the opposition.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If they start reducing So...