Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sinkingfeeling

(51,484 posts)
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:53 PM Jul 2012

The House passed the Mulvaney-Frank amendment to the military budget

last night.

The House approved a nearly $606 billion Pentagon budget bill Thursday evening after agreeing to cap core defense appropriations at 2012 levels — $1.1 billion below what was recommended by the Republican leadership.

The freeze marks a modest but still important turning point in the budget wars with 89 Republicans joining 158 Democrats on the key 247-167 vote.

Indeed, the final bill — approved 326-90 — remains more than $6 billion over the stricter defense caps set in the Budget Control Act for the Pentagon. But the GOP support garnered by Mulvaney on his amendment and earlier votes on Pakistan and Afghanistan funding reflected a greater willingness by Republicans to cut from security appropriations.

The freeze amendment brings the core Pentagon appropriations back to about $518.1 billion, $1.1 billion below what was recommended by the leadership. At the same time, a second pot of $88.2 billion in emergency war-related funds was cut by about $825 million in the course of the two-day floor debate.

Much as it resisted the Mulvaney-Frank freeze, that loss for the Appropriations Committee leadership was more the exception — not the rule.

Deeper cuts proposed by liberal Democrats were easily defeated in most cases, and the underlying funding for military operations was never in any serious jeopardy.

http://www.nj.com/us-politics/index.ssf/2012/07/house_oks_606b_defense_budget.html

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The House passed the Mulvaney-Frank amendment to the military budget (Original Post) sinkingfeeling Jul 2012 OP
Childish behavior SiDevilIam Jul 2012 #1
So tell me why the debt wasn't a problem during the Bush administration? And you're sinkingfeeling Jul 2012 #2
It'd be nice to have a Congress cut the defense budget by 50%. nt Comrade_McKenzie Jul 2012 #3
I heard some of the top Republicans state in an article that they weren't going to allow davidpdx Jul 2012 #4
 

SiDevilIam

(1 post)
1. Childish behavior
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 04:55 PM
Jul 2012

American law makers, both sides of aisle, must stop playing childish games. The matter of US debt burden is real and needs a common effort to be reduced before it blows the whole US economy to dust.

I am serious.

...and I am Sid Harth@webworldismyoyster,com

sinkingfeeling

(51,484 posts)
2. So tell me why the debt wasn't a problem during the Bush administration? And you're
Mon Jul 23, 2012, 09:53 AM
Jul 2012

upset that the military budget was frozen?

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
4. I heard some of the top Republicans state in an article that they weren't going to allow
Mon Jul 23, 2012, 10:17 AM
Jul 2012

themselves to get boxed in on the budget and were going to get the budget dealt with before the election. I kind of doubt it will happen.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The House passed the Mulv...