General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsdrray23
(7,627 posts)and is credited for the invention of the web.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)Is physics at a dead end?
Just curious what your take is on it.
I know very little.
drray23
(7,627 posts)There is never a end to it. In the 18th century, after the work of leibnitz , newton , euler we ended up with the mathematical tools to describe the physics of bodies in motion really well using differential equations such as Newton laws. Likewise in fluid mechanics (bernouli) and celestial mechanics (newton and others ).
At this time physicists thought they could finally describe the world and they were done. They kept applying this approach in the 19th century with thermodynamics ( clausius, thomson, gibbs, kelvin ) magneto statics, electrostatics, etc.. ( maxwell, faraday, etc.. ) .
It gradually became obvious that this was not the end of it. Einstein, swinger and others opened up a whole new area of physics when they showed that the classical description was just an approximation of a more complete theory ( general relativity, quantum mechanics, etc.. ) . The early part of the 20th century was another golden age.
Today, we are going further, refining our knowledge. The current big hurdle is figuribg out hiw to have a unified description of all laws of nature, unifying gravity with strong and weak interactions, as well as quantum electrodynamics.
LHC at cern is one tool we are using to explore that. There is also very active research on gravitational waves ( ligo experiment) which just got a nobel prize ( kip thorne).
It is far from being a dead field. It just is becoming more specialized. Newton was able to make contributions in several areas of physics as well as mathematics. Nowadays, you specialize in one area because the body of knowledge you have to absorb before making meaningful contributions is vast.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)But I am fascinated by those who do.
I had read that there were dead ends and if I am being honest, part of what I do know is because of a TV show;, I keep looking up what Sheldon says, I use CC so I can see the words spelled out fully and I google several things while watching each Big Bang Theory show.
I know it is a dumb TV show but a recent episode was about how physics was at a dead end on some stuff. Dont recall the details.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,852 posts)I have a son who has just started a PhD program in physics, studying exo-planets. There's still tons of stuff in all of physics to be learned.
A couple of years ago at a science panel at a science fiction con, someone in the audience suggested, quite seriously that there was nothing new to be learned in physics. He got the best laugh I've ever heard at something like that.
blogslut
(38,000 posts)emulatorloo
(44,119 posts)Computer nerd here so of course
canetoad
(17,152 posts)In developing hyper-text markup language which made the world wide web, as we know it, possible.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)rufus dog
(8,419 posts)Is that correct Alex?
How about, someone who has not sat in my kitchen? To steal a Cliff Claven.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)Which Sir Tim Berners-Lee?
Sir Tim Berners-Lee, Fourteenth Earl of Bartles-on-the-James? Cool guy; would definitely party with again.
Or the Internet dude? Cause the Internet dude wont shut up about his knighthood. Every time you click on a link on his Wikipedia page it passive-aggressively redirects to coat of arms. True fact.
And Tim? If youre reading, a couple more points:
1. Just because youve got two sticks does not obligate everyone to play Horsey Joust with you.
And
2. Winning a Queen Elizabeth Prize does not entitle you to your very own Queen Elizabeth, so stop calling the castle. People are starting to talk.
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)Yavin4
(35,438 posts)Trillions of dollars of wealth have been built upon his work. The richest man in the world today owes everything to him.
unblock
(52,205 posts)petronius
(26,602 posts)no clue who he was...
muriel_volestrangler
(101,311 posts)For a short while, it looked like it could rival HTTP. But the decision to license must have helped strangle it.