General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWho the hell even signed the Whitefish-contract?
There must be somebody, a person, who signed this thing on behalf of Puerto Rico!
So who did it? And what gives this person the authority to sign away the rights of various US government departments to look into this contract?
And how big was the bribe?
fleur-de-lisa
(14,629 posts)Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)Thomas Hurt
(13,903 posts)whether that is the case doesn't seem to be clear.....a CO in FEMA or a CO in the PR gov't?
underpants
(183,029 posts)In the normal bidding process.
Responsive means they get the sealed or unsealed bud in on time. Whether work papers are required is set by the contracting officer.
Responsible means they have a bond. If they fail to do the work the govt cashes the bond and use it to pay another contractor to do the job.
This no bid is bullshit. Rife for corruption.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)If they did it with open competition it would take 120 days to award the fucking thing.
Federal Contracting Laws are broken
underpants
(183,029 posts)The way THIS is being handled is BS.
I agree with you.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)What do you think it is?
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)And the utility company is owned by the government of PR.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Are these federal appropriations or state?
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)I hadn't seen any indication that Federal funds have been specifically allocated for that yet.
It may happen as a "you incurred this debt rebuilding here is some federal money to clear that out", but that's to be seen. It would be unusual for Federal funds to go to rebuild an electric utility.
Typically federal funds don't rebuild utilities. You see them issue bonds and/or raise rates with a surcharge and eventually the costs are just passed on to the utility customers.
Since this utility of owned by the PR government that may change things, but I doubt it.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)And is easy to track. If these are state appropriations it is easy enough to see. Just cross reference a number on "type of funds"
And you are completely wrong about federal funds rebuilding utilities. In the day I used to work on disaster relief contracts. It's quite common, but as noted needs the proper appropriation
dumbcat
(2,120 posts)It isn't due to excellent planning and adherence to prudent rules.
And how would they be state appropriations? Puerto Rico is not a state.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)If the money was appropriated for a state or territory, they could theoretically do their own Contract.
Otherwise, it's a federal contract through a federal agencies.
The feds send monies to states all the time for them to Contract as they see fit.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Here is an article talking about how the cost for Irma recovery will be passed on to customers, even though applying for federal disaster funds is also an option.
https://www.google.com/amp/amp.wftv.com/weather/eye-on-the-tropics/duke-fpl-customers-could-pay-for-hurricane-irma-cost-repairs/611666910
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)When a state of emergency is declared. USACE has some, FEMA has some.
What you linked to is something different
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)CO is a commanding officer.
The contract is public knowledge. It should have the KO office symbol
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Would be required unless something funny was going on.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)It's a state owned electric utility.
And even before the hurricane horribly run and managed, to the point they were billions in debt.