General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrumps nominees are already working despite not being confirmed by the senate
https://www.rawstory.com/2017/10/trumps-nominees-are-already-working-despite-not-being-confirmed-by-the-senate-and-it-might-be-illegal/#.WerM7UgNwuE.twitterSeveral of President Donald Trumps unconfirmed nominees may be breaking the law by working at their proposed government agencies before the Senate has confirmed them.
The four officials showing up to work at three different agenciesthe State Department, the Office of Management and Budget and the Environmental Protection Agencyappear to be skirting the Federal Vacancies Reform Act, POLITICO reported on Friday.
(snip)
Trump in July nominated Michael Dourson to head the EPAs Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Preventionand Dourson is already working as an adviser to Pruitt on chemicals, E&E News reported on Wednesday.
(snip)
In May, Trump nominated Susan Bodine to head up the EPAs enforcement office, and she also is already working there as an adviser to Pruitt on those issues.
(end snip)
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/20/trump-nominees-working-senate-approval-243972
annabanana
(52,791 posts)Who's giving it to them. I'd slam the doors in their faces.
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)onenote
(42,831 posts)gristy
(10,667 posts)m.govexec.com?
Qutzupalotl
(14,341 posts)from January 10, 2017. Here is a relevant snip:
The Obama administration has taken some heat from Republicans for implementing last-minute rules and regulations that could hamper President-elect Trump from implementing his agenda, but Obama is giving his successor at least one parting gift: the ability to place nominees into agency positions while they await confirmation.
The Office of Personnel Management announced the authority on Monday, which will enable Trump appointees to serve in temporary Senior Executive Service positions before the Senate votes on their nominations. The appointees would serve in advisory or consultative capacity. Beth Cobert, OPMs acting director, said in a memorandum to all federal agencies that the authority would support agencies transition needs.
DK504
(3,847 posts)on security clearances are on the way.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Legally. Surely there must be some recourse. This is inexcusable.
We are living in a de facto dictatorship. Do you want to know how Nazi Germany happened? This is how it happened. Nobody stood up.
BigmanPigman
(51,658 posts)Who and where are the people and agencies who are supposed to stop this from occurring?