Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

a kennedy

(29,771 posts)
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 01:00 PM Jul 2012

36 Percent Of Fukushima Children Have Abnormal Growths From Radiation Exposure

Of more than 38,000 children tested from the Fukushima Prefecture in Japan, 36 percent have abnormal growths – cysts or nodules – on their thyroids a year after the Fukushima nuclear disaster, as reported by ENENews.

The shocking numbers come from the thyroid examination section of the "Sixth Report of Fukushima Prefecture Health Management Survey," published by Fukushima Radioactive Contamination Symptoms Research (FRCSR) and translated by the blog Fukushima Voice.

Shunichi Yamashita, M.D., president of the Japan Thyroid Association, sent a letter to members in January with guidelines for treating thyroid abnormalities. In 2001 Yamashita co-authored a study that found normal children in Nagasaki to have 0 percent nodules and 0.8 percent cysts.

The introduction of the letter, written by Fukushima Voice, states that the results in Fukushima show a "much faster progression compared to Chernobyl" as research done around Chernobyl showed the rate of thyroid nodules in children 5 to 10 years after the accident to be 1.74 percent.


http://www.businessinsider.com/a-stunning-36-percent-of-fukushima-children-have-abnormal-growths-from-radiation-exposure-2012-7

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
36 Percent Of Fukushima Children Have Abnormal Growths From Radiation Exposure (Original Post) a kennedy Jul 2012 OP
Words fail. Scuba Jul 2012 #1
Ditto malaise Jul 2012 #28
Thanks for posting this. I saw the info online but it was all in Japanese.... nc4bo Jul 2012 #2
I'm waiting for DU's band of nuke apologists to show up to say this isn't so. Arugula Latte Jul 2012 #3
That would be me. AtheistCrusader Jul 2012 #12
You are wrong. MsPithy Jul 2012 #17
At some point the costs become so high AtheistCrusader Jul 2012 #27
Eat your bananas. nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #21
It is just so sad...... a kennedy Jul 2012 #4
This is stunning to those Harmony Blue Jul 2012 #5
so sad n/t RainDog Jul 2012 #6
What about the kids who live near blown-up mountain-tops full of coal? Odin2005 Jul 2012 #7
What does pain for one variety of victim PDJane Jul 2012 #8
That would be a different post. This is a board with many posts. nilram Jul 2012 #11
Yes but that would diminish the hijack potential to deflect discussion closeupready Jul 2012 #22
Ever hear of a non sequitur? Zoeisright Jul 2012 #14
ALL children matter eom chknltl Jul 2012 #16
WTF? marmar Jul 2012 #24
This is horrible news. ryan_cats Jul 2012 #9
I remember the iodine discussions Duer 157099 Jul 2012 #15
so incredibly sad Coexist Jul 2012 #10
So sad and more Fukishima fallout possibly to come lovuian Jul 2012 #13
ticking timebomb indeed. chknltl Jul 2012 #19
At least they got out of denial enough to start removing the fuel rods flamingdem Jul 2012 #25
I agree! ryan_cats Jul 2012 #20
Really sad to read this. FedUpWithIt All Jul 2012 #18
Officials in Japan have opened Fukushima state's first beach to swimmers FedUpWithIt All Jul 2012 #23
I am guilty of needing to step away from this for a little while... hlthe2b Jul 2012 #26
Sad and not unexpected. It will be interesting to watch and see how the numbers develop uppityperson Jul 2012 #29

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
2. Thanks for posting this. I saw the info online but it was all in Japanese....
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 01:08 PM
Jul 2012

No one seemed to be able to translate.

Horrific.....

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
12. That would be me.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 02:23 PM
Jul 2012

This is unexpected. There will need to be more study on WHY, but my money is on the plan to shelter in place, or an artificially small evacuation zone would be the cause behind this.

Whatever my opinion on nuclear power, what is done is done, and we need to make sure we learn from this, so it is not repeated. We owe at LEAST that much to those kids. If that means shutting down reactors too close to population zones, increased costs born by nuclear plant operators to provide for more emergency response equipment like standby busses, etc, so be it.

If the costs are too high, these plants will go away regardless.

MsPithy

(809 posts)
17. You are wrong.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 03:04 PM
Jul 2012

"If the costs are too high, these plants will go away regardless."

Nope. When the costs are too high, the nuclear plant operators bribe the politicians to divert costs to the taxpayer.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
27. At some point the costs become so high
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 04:27 PM
Jul 2012

and the plants so unreliable that even that is untenable.

Look at San Onofre. That thing is totally screwed financially. I don't anticipate it will be coming back online.

Harmony Blue

(3,978 posts)
5. This is stunning to those
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 01:10 PM
Jul 2012

that don't understand the science behind nuclear power.

In other words, it isn't something we should try to be harnessing in the public or private sector. It is risky even in military applications.

So sad.

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
7. What about the kids who live near blown-up mountain-tops full of coal?
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 01:14 PM
Jul 2012

Oh, they are a bunch of redneck hicks and so don't matter.

PDJane

(10,103 posts)
8. What does pain for one variety of victim
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 01:21 PM
Jul 2012

have to do with pain for the other variety of victim? It's past time to make a concerted push to renewables, before our entire habitat becomes completely uninhabitable.

That includes coal, nukes and tar sands, all of which are creating child victims.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
22. Yes but that would diminish the hijack potential to deflect discussion
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 03:24 PM
Jul 2012

away from the hazards of nuclear power.

ryan_cats

(2,061 posts)
9. This is horrible news.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 01:22 PM
Jul 2012

This is horrible news, didn't they give people iodine tablets to stop this from happening? I thought if they took the iodine, it bonded where the radioactivity affects (I don't know exactly how it works) so this is disturbing.

We heard that even though the radiation levels were high, it was supposed to be safe? If it happened to my children, I would be furious. This isn't a bump in statistics, 36%, crap that's bad.

Duer 157099

(17,742 posts)
15. I remember the iodine discussions
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 03:00 PM
Jul 2012

but can't recall the outcome, whether they decided to not distribute it to everyone, or they didn't have enough, or what.

chknltl

(10,558 posts)
19. ticking timebomb indeed.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 03:20 PM
Jul 2012
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/operator-of-japans-crippled-fukushima-plant-disaster-removes-2-fuel-rods-prelude-to-cleanup/2012/07/18/gJQA71bdsW_story.html

Optimistic assesment that the fuel rods will be removed by the end of NEXT year? If that sucker spills its contents....

Imo, like the German citizens who were marched through the deathcamps after the war, those who openly promote nuke power should be made to witness the real life nightmare consequences of what they have promoted.

flamingdem

(39,337 posts)
25. At least they got out of denial enough to start removing the fuel rods
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 03:53 PM
Jul 2012

the problem is when they discover they're too damaged to remove.. this will go on for a decade increasing the chances of toppling via earthquake or typhoon

ryan_cats

(2,061 posts)
20. I agree!
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 03:20 PM
Jul 2012

I agree! This first problem hit the group I would consider to be the easiest to hit. But this isn't over. I read somewhere where the local crops were considered safe so more an more groups will be affected as the poison reaches a level that is bad and that level is higher on a bigger adult.

I have a feeling they will be dealing with the political and health fallout for a long time.

They downplayed the risks so people didn't have enough info on radiation's short and long term effects. Since they didn't know, they didn't move. I wonder what the daily exposure rate its?

The only upside is it might create Gojira.

One final thing, if whoever was responsible really accepts that they were impossible, they might kill themselves like the folks that repaired the 747 that crashed in Japan because of faulty repairs.



FedUpWithIt All

(4,442 posts)
18. Really sad to read this.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 03:19 PM
Jul 2012

It is likely just a matter of time before we begin to see consequences much further out.

My heart goes out to those families who will have to pay the costs.

FedUpWithIt All

(4,442 posts)
23. Officials in Japan have opened Fukushima state's first beach to swimmers
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 03:49 PM
Jul 2012
Officials in Japan have opened Fukushima state's first beach to swimmers since last year's nuclear disaster after judging the water to be safe.

About 1,000 people yesterday descended on Nakoso beach, about 40miles south of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant, where three reactors melted down after the March 11, 2011 earthquake and tsunami.





http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2175259/Families-flock-Fukushima-beach-officials-declare-safe-swim-sea-16-months-nuclear-disaster.html

hlthe2b

(102,519 posts)
26. I am guilty of needing to step away from this for a little while...
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 03:56 PM
Jul 2012

Feeling so powerless to do anything is really wrenching. I knew this had to be the outcome, but I desperately hoped it would not.

Words fail.....

uppityperson

(115,681 posts)
29. Sad and not unexpected. It will be interesting to watch and see how the numbers develop
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 04:41 PM
Jul 2012

Thyroids are very suspectible to radiation and I expected there to be a lot of thyroid issues there. It will be interesting to see what develops next, what the 5, 10, 20, etc yr numbers show. More data is needed after nuke events to better prepare for the future since as long as we have nuke plants, there will be "events".

This is very sad and I wish the best for them all. It sucks.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»36 Percent Of Fukushima C...