Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 12:17 PM Jul 2012

Discuss: In view of the following fact, corporate school reform is founded on a fallacious premise:

>>>>The mediocre performance of American students on international tests seems to show that our schools are doing poorly. But students from middle-class homes who attend well-funded schools rank among the best in the world on these tests, which means that teaching is not the problem. >>>>

LTTE: Today's NY Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/18/opinion/invitation-to-a-dialogue-an-excess-of-testing.html?_r=1

Let's assume the foregoing factoid to be true... for the sake of argument. Does this mean that the Obama/Duncan/Gates/GOP, etc. prescription for de-unionizing and privatizing large chunks of our public school system is rooted in logical and philosophical error?

I've given you a topic: corporate school "reform" is neither logical nor honest.

Discuss. Talk amongst yourselves.

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Discuss: In view of the following fact, corporate school reform is founded on a fallacious premise: (Original Post) Smarmie Doofus Jul 2012 OP
easy: "rooted in logical and philosophical error" annabanana Jul 2012 #1
Is there a source for the "middle-class.... best in the world" part? Scuba Jul 2012 #2
Let's *assume* that to be true. For the moment. What do you think? Smarmie Doofus Jul 2012 #3
I think it would be a great argument if it were true. Scuba Jul 2012 #4
But if the data backs that up, you agree, then? Yes? Smarmie Doofus Jul 2012 #6
Diane Ravitch has written about this. proud2BlibKansan Jul 2012 #12
Thanks, saving for later. Scuba Jul 2012 #13
That would seem to put the blame on the parents 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #5
poverty and its cultivation of many detriments fascisthunter Jul 2012 #7
Education level of the parents 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #9
you'll see a greater number fail academically in poor areas than... fascisthunter Jul 2012 #11
If we remove the lower income kids from the data, our kids are ranked in the top 3 proud2BlibKansan Jul 2012 #8
That is another key factor in this debate 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #10
 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
3. Let's *assume* that to be true. For the moment. What do you think?
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 12:24 PM
Jul 2012

I'm trying to piece it together also.

 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
6. But if the data backs that up, you agree, then? Yes?
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 12:35 PM
Jul 2012

Me too.

It's 99 degrees here today . With a humidity index of 199. I'm not getting myself "embroiled" in a "firefight" or "crucible" this afternoon.

Let's see what the class can do with the "data". ( My inclination is... it's true. I'm in NYC. No one in our leafy greens: e.g. Scarsdale, Bronxville, Ardsey, Rye, Rockland, Nassau, etc. is talking about school "reform" and busting unions. Not that I ever heard of, anyway.)

And yes.. they're all unionized w. pay scales and seniority rules. So....what gives?

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
5. That would seem to put the blame on the parents
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 12:28 PM
Jul 2012

for poor performance.

Probably not entirely unfair in a lot of cases but it won't be a popular opinion and it won't be something that can be easily fixed at a national level.

 

fascisthunter

(29,381 posts)
7. poverty and its cultivation of many detriments
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 12:45 PM
Jul 2012

right now, there's an excess, and it's being ignored, so things will get worse nationally.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
9. Education level of the parents
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 12:50 PM
Jul 2012

and marital status are two huge indicators of academic success.

Also both associated with poverty.

 

fascisthunter

(29,381 posts)
11. you'll see a greater number fail academically in poor areas than...
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 12:53 PM
Jul 2012

well to do ones. SO many factors are involved with wealth and the lack of. Try studying for a test after only having a small9non-nutritional) meal. It's a sad state. I live around poverty...

proud2BlibKansan

(96,793 posts)
8. If we remove the lower income kids from the data, our kids are ranked in the top 3
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 12:47 PM
Jul 2012

And that's only fair since the countries we are being compared to only test their college bound kids.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
10. That is another key factor in this debate
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 12:52 PM
Jul 2012

We measure all our kids. Some other countries are a bit more selective.

Perhaps we should put a greater emphasis on trade schools for certain students rather than college.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Discuss: In view of the f...