General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCall all GOP reps. today to oppose eliminating checks on silencers and
more deadly ammo. Dial 1-877-960-2185 for free call. Ask them how much worse last night would have been if people can't hear the gunfire. The bill (they were to vote on today) is H.R. 3668 or the SHARE Act.
hack89
(39,171 posts)you can certainly hear it from a distance. Too many people getting their gun knowledge from movies.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)sinkingfeeling
(51,499 posts)Calculating
(2,957 posts)Seems like you're just using this unspeakable tragedy to push unrelated anti-gun agenda.
hack89
(39,171 posts)suppressor plus ear muffs lowers the noise level below the dangerous threshold.
Why do they represent such a public danger? Can you articulate your fears?
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)lets not forget they have been legal for decades.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)considering what guns -- and those attracted/addicted to them -- are doing to our society, directly or indirectly.
hack89
(39,171 posts)considering what alcohol -- and those attracted/addicted to it -- are doing to our society, directly or indirectly?
Just wondering if you were consistent.
uponit7771
(90,371 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)no wonder you are on a 20 year losing streak.
uponit7771
(90,371 posts)... "jack hammer" my ass, for every fire arm ?!
No... you know that
hack89
(39,171 posts)Emergency vehicle siren 115 db
Silenced .22 rifle 116 db
Thunder 120 db
Silenced 9mm pistol 125 db
Dish breaking 129 db
Jackhammer 130 db
Silenced .223 rifle 134 db
Silenced 12 gauge shotgun 137 db
Jet taking off 150 db
Non-silenced 12 gauge shotgun 160 db
Non-silenced .223 rifle 165 db
https://crimefictionbook.com/2015/04/28/how-loud-is-a-silencer/
uponit7771
(90,371 posts)... argument that silencers don't quite a gun and no sense in arguing a silenced 22 is louder than a jackhamer which your post shows its not.
you win. Have a nice day.
JoeStuckInOH
(544 posts)I Googled Quietest Silencers. This one was mentioned: Gemtech Mist
https://gemtech.com/gemtech-mist-22-supressor.html
It's "114 dB" and most all of the others I looked up claim to be anywhere from 115-140dB. I guess it depends on model. For What it's worth, I saw the numbers of 150-160dB mentioned for most guns WITHOUT silencers. Anyways, see chart of common loud things below. It's very well possible that many silencers have the report of a "jackhammer". It's probably worth mentioning that things like jackhammers, lawn mowers, and jet engines make continuous noise and a gunshot is a relatively "short" sound... that may have something to do with someone's perception of how "loud" it is.
uponit7771
(90,371 posts)... the quiter the possibility of the suppressor.
A 22 with a suppressor isn't going to sound like a jackhammer ...
So why give a blank ability to get them through this bill?!
Its a sick ass'd bill
JoeStuckInOH
(544 posts)They're practically as many decibels as handheld airhorns, for crying out loud. Yeah... super stealthy.
And 22LR is pretty much as small & Quiet as it gets and it's still not whisper quiet enough for shooters to go "unheard". Especially considering MOST hunters and shooters are going to be using more substantial bullets than a popgun 22LR at things.
As far as I'm concerned, a silencer is just an accessory that has no practical effect on the lethality of a gun or shooting event. They're not ninja/assassin level "quiet" in any regards. And If anything it makes a gun heavier and more unwieldy (harder to conceal).
There are however possible upsides to decreasing the restrictions on silencers including hearing protection and decreasing the disturbances caused by legitimate hunting and target/practice shooting.
uponit7771
(90,371 posts)... get the feedback here.
"its not as quite as nuke bomb" still doesn't make the silencer bill a good one.
JoeStuckInOH
(544 posts)If a hunter or recreational shooter can shoot without permanently damaging hearing, or shoot without raucously annoying neighbors 1/2 mile away, or use a gun in self defense indoors in the middle of the night without deafening themselves.... well than those are reasons enough.
If someone thinks this silencer bill will helps a mass shooter go unheard during a massacre... well then their intellect in on par with Trumps.
uponit7771
(90,371 posts)JoeStuckInOH
(544 posts)Spent 2 years in Afghanistan. Getting fired upon was a weekly affair. I've also fired many guns suppressed and unsuppressed. Safe to say I have more than my fair share of experience on the matter from both sides of the gun.
Typical medium rifle cartridge probably has a gunshot report of ~160dB
A suppressed intermediate rifle (AR, AK, etc) is probably shooting around 130dB
The bullet Flight is probably somewhere in the 115dB range. (still VERY loud)
Silencers quiet gunshots... NOT bullet flight. You don't have to be too far away from a 160dB or 130dB gun shooting in your direction before the bullet flight is the loudest thing you hear. Maybe 100 yards or so depending if the weapon is muzzle braked. When someone is that far away with a rifle, the sound of the supersonic bullet passing is the FIRST thing you hear. A loud crack passing through the air. Then, a moment or so later, you hear the actual gunshot. It's a muted "pop". This is quite unsettling the first time you experience it firsthand. Unless the shooter is relatively close the supersonic crack of the shots around you can be significantly louder than the gunshot.
This guy was dozens of floors up over a Vegas mall. For all those victims not right up near the Hotel, the loudest component of the attack would be the bullets in the air and bullets hitting pavement. NOT the gunshots. I'm not saying A silencer would have made NO difference... but if it did it would be VERY trivial if you were down in that concert gallery.
The biggest advantage of a suppressor to the shooter would be difficulty in locating him from someone else (ie: police counter-sniper) LOOKING/LISTENING for him... and even then, only if the shooter were taking a few shots at a time. A silencer isn't going to help conceal someone laying down continuous full auto with a rifle.
EDIT: I guess I'd have to agree to disagree on potential risks of allowing silencers to become unregulated. They really aren't quiet, but still quiet enough to offer ear protection and reduce nuisance to people nearby.
uponit7771
(90,371 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I like to trivialize the concerns of others as mere fear as well...as it allows our own narratives and biases a thicker patina of self-righteousness and cleverness.
hack89
(39,171 posts)then it is worthy of trivialization. Emotions don't trump hard facts in my world. Your mileage might differ.
sinkingfeeling
(51,499 posts)why is Duncan's bill preempting state laws and destroying records after 1 year? Why do you need armor piercing ammo?
This bill is a piece of GOP partnering to Trumps base.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/3668/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22SHARE+Act%22%5D%7D&r=1
hack89
(39,171 posts)just curious why a rifle at 120 decibels is all of a sudden a public safety risk.
sinkingfeeling
(51,499 posts)out this bill is a POS, including much more than silencers. Why do you need armor piercing ammo?
hack89
(39,171 posts)especially at the part about armor piercing ammo and it is not clear to me that it will all of a sudden make it more common and easier to get. It just looks like they are tightening the language. Perhaps you can explain to me the impact of the changes.
I don't need armor piercing ammo.
nycbos
(6,044 posts)Baconator
(1,459 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)Has a ranch house a couple hours away and goes there once in a while to get away. Has a stand and he can get the first one and after that shot they scatter like, well wild hogs....
sinkingfeeling
(51,499 posts)call themself a hunter.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)There is a reason in Texas you can kill as many wild hogs as you want every day, all year long...
uponit7771
(90,371 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)and you have get to articulate why they pose a danger to public safety?
They have been legal for decades - can you point out a single mass killing using one? How many crimes can you find where one was used?
Don't be mad - moral panic has never been an effective means of argument. You shouldn't be surprised when you get called on it.
obamanut2012
(26,188 posts)Often, they actually make the guns more inaccurate, but they don't silence them at all.