General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIt is my understanding in Texas you CANT be forced to have sprinklers in a building
or to have to comply with any type of government regulated fire prevention?
Is this true, anybody in Texas?
If so, when the inevitable damage occurs that would NOT have had they had the proper regulations, surely they wont ask US to pay for it?
Justice
(7,185 posts)I agree that when inevitable damage occurs that would NOT have had (or would be lessened) they had common sense regulations, the federal government (meaning all of us) should not pay.
Like conditioning highway funds on having a certain speed limit because that reduces accidents.
Maddow did a great piece on this last night - after the West plant explosion, the only change the state made to its laws was to make the company's chemical list to the state private (prior to that the list was public).
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)told the enemy is the immigrant, that we really need to do a tax amnesty deal AGAIN for corps so they can bring the money back on to American soil, forgetting that last time they did this the investors used that money to buy more stock, not to help create more jobs.
When tax payers are told they are paying for buildings that could have been saved but for this reckless attitude by the GOP, will it matter?
Not if the GOP is telling them black people are violent and immigrants are out for their jobs.
AJT
(5,240 posts)VMA131Marine
(4,138 posts)Yet for 173 of Texas 254 counties, adopting rules based on that experience is illegal. They are either below 250,000 in population or dont touch a county of that size.
Having fewer people doesnt mean less risk. Those counties contain some of the most dangerous chemicals and industrial processes in Texas, The Dallas Morning News found.
Its not 1956 anymore, said Jasper County Judge Mark Allen, whose county, while mostly rural, has multiple potential sources of industrial risks.
Its not 1964 or 65, Allen said. Were not Mayberry. We have life-threatening events every day.
But 85 percent of the code-prohibited counties have no full-time professional fire department anywhere in the county, The News found. Only a few bigger industries have their own specially trained and equipped in-house fire brigades.
Training and gear for chemical emergencies are beyond the reach of most volunteer fire departments. In the 173 counties that cannot adopt a fire code, 21 have established local emergency-services districts, but few of those provide enough money even to cover the basics.
With a state-mandated tax cap of 10 cents per $100 in assessed property value, a $100,000 home provides an emergency-services district with no more than $100 a year.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)This sounds like one of the stupidest things I can imagine. Who's law is this? Companies that are too cheap and reckless to install sprinklers?
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)not ONE THIN DIME for any property damage that could have been prevented with basic fire prevention regulations.
Not one.
Response to Eliot Rosewater (Original post)
trc This message was self-deleted by its author.
ecstatic
(32,681 posts)I'm watching this very topic right now (DVR of Rachel Maddow's show). Mind boggling! They are so evil, greedy and short sighted. Or maybe they're ok with shit literally blowing up in their faces so they can collect the insurance payouts?