Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Arpaio Pardon Dangerously Accelerates Trumps Assault on the Rule of Law
On his last day of office, in 2001, President Bill Clinton pardoned Marc Rich, the billionaire commodity trader on the F.B.I.s Ten Most Wanted list for crimes spanning from tax evasion to illegal trading with Iran during the American hostage crisis. The pardon was controversial because it was so overtly politicalRichs ex-wife, a major Democratic Party donor, along with a powerful coterie of Israeli officials, had lobbied hard for itand Clinton himself came to regret the pardon for the damage it did to his reputation.
Rank cronyism and political expediency are again on display in President Donald Trumps recent pardon of Joe Arpaio, the former sheriff of Maricopa County. Arpaio was one of Trumps earliest and most outspoken political supporters, and a stalwart proponent of the false birther claim, which Trump rode to political prominence. Trump announced the likely pardon of Arpaio at the most inappropriate possible venuea raucous Arizona political rally paid for by his 2020 reëlection campaign. And the pardon was granted hours before a Category 4 hurricane was projected to hit the coast of Texas and cause catastrophic and life-threatening flooding. But the Arpaio pardon accelerates Trumps assault on the rule of law and legal norms far beyond anything that could be said of Clintons pardon of Rich.
Fully appreciating what Trump has wrought, constitutionally speaking, requires recognizing that the U.S. executive branch is an enormous and complex machine. It dwarfs the other two branches, with over two million civilian employees. And since Watergate and the release, in 1976, of the Church Committee report, which detailed wider executive-branch abuses, this vast federal bureaucracy has increasingly accreted an intricate array of wheels and pulleys designed to insure that the President and his people not only enforce legal authorities but also abide by them. The Arpaio pardon is a perfect conflagration of all of the ways that Trump has systematically undermined these authorities over the course of his first seven months in office. It is nothing less than a multipronged attack on the executive branchs own commitment to the rule of law.
This point has been overshadowed somewhat by Arpaios track record of brutal civil-rights violations, a subject that has justifiably attracted great public scrutiny. Arpaios crime was willfully defying a courts attempt to halt some of these violationsspecifically, his contempt of a federal court order that he stop racially profiling and detaining Latinos on nothing more than his suspicion of their immigration status. As a result, criticism of Trumps pardon for encouraging civil-rights abuses has gone hand-in-hand with extensive commentary on how it undermines judicial authority. Noah Feldman, a professor at Harvard Law School, argued last week that, because the only legally binding check on law enforcement is the authority of the judiciary to say what the law is, a President who blocks the courts from sanctioning a sheriff who intentionally defies the law is breaking the basic structure of the legal order.
Rank cronyism and political expediency are again on display in President Donald Trumps recent pardon of Joe Arpaio, the former sheriff of Maricopa County. Arpaio was one of Trumps earliest and most outspoken political supporters, and a stalwart proponent of the false birther claim, which Trump rode to political prominence. Trump announced the likely pardon of Arpaio at the most inappropriate possible venuea raucous Arizona political rally paid for by his 2020 reëlection campaign. And the pardon was granted hours before a Category 4 hurricane was projected to hit the coast of Texas and cause catastrophic and life-threatening flooding. But the Arpaio pardon accelerates Trumps assault on the rule of law and legal norms far beyond anything that could be said of Clintons pardon of Rich.
Fully appreciating what Trump has wrought, constitutionally speaking, requires recognizing that the U.S. executive branch is an enormous and complex machine. It dwarfs the other two branches, with over two million civilian employees. And since Watergate and the release, in 1976, of the Church Committee report, which detailed wider executive-branch abuses, this vast federal bureaucracy has increasingly accreted an intricate array of wheels and pulleys designed to insure that the President and his people not only enforce legal authorities but also abide by them. The Arpaio pardon is a perfect conflagration of all of the ways that Trump has systematically undermined these authorities over the course of his first seven months in office. It is nothing less than a multipronged attack on the executive branchs own commitment to the rule of law.
This point has been overshadowed somewhat by Arpaios track record of brutal civil-rights violations, a subject that has justifiably attracted great public scrutiny. Arpaios crime was willfully defying a courts attempt to halt some of these violationsspecifically, his contempt of a federal court order that he stop racially profiling and detaining Latinos on nothing more than his suspicion of their immigration status. As a result, criticism of Trumps pardon for encouraging civil-rights abuses has gone hand-in-hand with extensive commentary on how it undermines judicial authority. Noah Feldman, a professor at Harvard Law School, argued last week that, because the only legally binding check on law enforcement is the authority of the judiciary to say what the law is, a President who blocks the courts from sanctioning a sheriff who intentionally defies the law is breaking the basic structure of the legal order.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-arpaio-pardon-dangerously-accelerates-trumps-assault-on-the-rule-of-law
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 1506 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post