General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAppears Houston Mostly Built On Ancient Swamp Land. Prone To Flooding.
If you look very carefully the bayou system that was designed to drain water from the Houston area was like part of a much older swampy area. My guess is that the land was more or less dried out when the bayous were contained over time and channelled to by used as a flood control system. Of course in recent memory it is likely that as Houston grew more and more questionable land was developed between the low areas.
A lot of the flooding looks like is in lower areas that were ancient drainages. And it is likely that no one was around when this area was largely a swamp.
It may be that Houston should have never been developed.
NutmegYankee
(16,205 posts)The buildings, concrete, and asphalt don't absorb rain and just channel it to runoff zones. In a natural landscape the rain would take much longer to to work it's way down to the river waterways.
Pope George Ringo II
(1,896 posts)Large parts of the city are nominally reclaimed swampland, period. As it is, modern medicine is the only thing allowing it to be survivable, and nobody even remotely sane would live here until modern air conditioning. It's actually a nice place most of the time, but tropical storms just blow the place up.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,205 posts)Up in the Northeast the frost line is 3-5 feet below ground, making basements a good idea. Hell, even deck supports in my area require a 48" depth to avoid the frost line. Also, the glacial till soils don't swell like southern clay and drain well.
Having relocated over a decade ago, I have come to love the utility of a basement.
dembotoz
(16,866 posts)Can. Not imagine not having one
Ilsa
(61,712 posts)in areas where the land has frequent variations in altitude or just grade. My basement is underground on three out of four sides. It stays cool in summer, although I run a dehumidifier.
dembotoz
(16,866 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,205 posts)In many areas of the south, usually low lying coastal plains, basements are virtually non-existent. Houses are either on a slab or a crawlspace. Other areas do put them in, often in hilly areas where the soil drains better.
KatyMan
(4,218 posts)SF and LA are in earthquake prone areas, the northeast gets pummeled by snow sometimes and the Pacific northwest and Hawaii have volcanoes. Should we live anywhere?
BigmanPigman
(51,651 posts)KatyMan
(4,218 posts)Why don't they evacuate?
sarisataka
(18,899 posts)It's geologically stable, no air so no storms, no flooding issues, pretty much ideal from a natural disaster perspective
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)sarisataka
(18,899 posts)Back to Realtor.com
Warpy
(111,437 posts)with the port separate from the city. Water always wins.
LeftInTX
(25,763 posts)Drainages/bayous that are near sea level have often changed course over time.
TheMastersNemesis
(10,602 posts)Sensible development is staying out of the most dangerous areas and to mitigate reasonably the dangers that do exist where one does develop. What ever the danger damage and loss of life can be protected. We develop in so many areas where there should be none. And we fail to take protective measure where there is remaining dangers we cannot reasonable avoid.
sarisataka
(18,899 posts)Or equal to all the houses built in California's fire zone?
cloudbase
(5,531 posts)blogslut
(38,022 posts)Ilsa
(61,712 posts)of the beaches, too. Move them back a mile or so.