General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo what did I miss this morning on the Georgetown Cocktail Party talk shows?
I've been out all day, church, errands.
What'd I miss?
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)The GOPers are arguing amongst themselves. Those defending him have nothing except to blame Obama. Mittens is in deep trouble... at least for now.
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)nt
morningfog
(18,115 posts)All the goppers recognize Mitt is flailing and losing. Mitt's spokesman stuck to the lies. Obama's team hit hard.
ETA: Oh, yeah, Mitt retired from Bain "retroactively", but no one know what the hell that even means.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)hehe.
Spazito
(50,587 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)So 1999-2002 does not count!
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Unless I see the dental records from President Obama, his wife and his children, the results of his last prostate exam and his driver's license test score, I don't think we need to see another thing from Mitt in the way of his taxes.
Fair is fair. Let's see the dental records, Mr. President, then we'll talk about Mitt's tax returns.
I hope the tag is unnecessary here.
I think its obvious.
However I could have swore I read almost the same demand on the comments over at Yahoo and they WEREN"T kidding!!
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I'm not militant about it, I was just passing through and said it. I'm as much of a normal person as their "normal person" is, even if I posted it twice. And that's all I posted it. I don't give a shit about Yahoo.
11 Bravo
(23,928 posts)the usual fare.
malaise
(269,278 posts)Retroactively is the word today - ask Ed Gillespie - his face is priceless just before he said Willard retired retroactively
rufus dog
(8,419 posts)Republicans aren't marching in lockstep.
The talking heads actually asking the same question over and over in an attempt to get an answer. (Stretch actually asked Gillespie an outsourcing question three or four times in a row)
My expectation was that the media would allow them to sweep it under the rug and that didn't happen.
UTUSN
(70,782 posts)She's always kissing wingnuts and she's got a bad case of *hot*wingnut*sex* for Hayley BARBOUR, so today as I clicked away she managed to get in there, to AXELROD, "When YOU do your taxes, don't YOU take advantage of any possible loophole to pay less?!1" The dude paused a little too long, but finally slapped back, "I don't have any Swiss bank accounts." Either before or after, she said that WASSERMAN SHULTZ does. Lying creepazoid, CROWLEY if it's not clear who I'm talking about, if your 501K does your investments, do YOU have a Swiss bank account?!1
However, the Brit HUMEster, who used to pimpslap Juan WILLIAMS every week, did his usual 99.9% of being a Rethug operative, but when KKKarl said that Mittens should be "proactive" in refuting the BAIN thing, the HUMEster said, "He can't, because he's TRAPPED!1" Which KKKarl almost choked to deny.