General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsslate "The Arpaio Pardon Is a Bad Sign for the Mueller Investigation"
Trump has always wanted to stifle judicial oversight. Now hes shown he will.
By Mark Joseph Stern
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/08/trump_s_arpaio_pardon_is_a_bad_sign_for_mueller_s_investigation.html
When President Donald Trump pardoned Sheriff Joe Arpaio on Friday, he tweeted that the sheriff was an American patriot who kept Arizona safe! His pardon was, in one sense, narrow: Arpaio was not convicted for his relentless and well-documented brutality, but for criminal contempt after he violated a court order demanding that he stop illegally detaining Latinos. In another sense, however, Trumps pardonwhich was accompanied by a White House statement praising Arpaio and eliding his misdeedsbroadly condones the sheriffs relentless criminality. It sends a message to Latinos that they do not deserve equal rights, and affirms to the judiciary that Trump has no respect for the rule of law.
But Trumps pardon of the sheriff is also troubling for its timing. The political nature of the pardon is obviousit vividly demonstrates Trumps willingness to abuse his presidential powers in order to let his friends and supporters off the hook. But just as notable is that it came right on the heels of the presidents Phoenix rally, as the president is being pressured to disavow the most racist elements of his base. Whats even worse is the fact that the pardon arrived without review, and before Arpaio was even sentenced for defying the courts. As my colleague Dahlia Lithwick has written, Arpaios conviction was a test for how long and how willing Trump will be to abide judicial oversight. He flunked it. It now seems clear that many future beneficiaries of the presidents clemency will be his political alliesand that he might not wait to for them to be convicted or sentenced before issuing a pardon. Trump, in other words, may use his pardon power to stymie Robert Muellers investigation, as well as other inquiries into the past misdeeds of his associates.
The commonalities between Arpaio and Trump are striking. Both men disdain the rule of law, and Arpaios unrestrained racial profiling and harassment of perceived enemieshe arrested journalists who wrote about him criticallyall sound like true expressions of Trumps own deep desires. Trump and Arpaio were first drawn to each other over their belief that President Barack Obamas Hawaiian birth certificate was forged. (Somehow, Arpaio found the money to send an investigator to Hawaii, who concluded, falsely, that the certificate was fraudulent.) Their bond deepened during the campaign: Arpaio endorsed Trump early, then stumped for him and appeared at campaign events where the two men lauded each other for their hatred of undocumented immigrants. In 2016, Glenn Thrush called Arpaio Trumps political godfather and described the sheriffs profound affection for Trump. The two shared startlingly similar bigotries, biases, and strongman instincts.
Its no surprise, then, that Trump wished to pardon Arpaio. But it is genuinely shocking that the president followed through, and did so in this manner. There has long been a careful procedure in place for the pardon process: Individuals submit a request for clemency, and the Justice Department recommends good candidates based on pre-approved guidelines. Trump didnt bother even to pretend to use this system to pardon Arpaio. The sheriff hadnt formally requested one, the usual first step in the process. And he hadnt yet been sentenced. Typically, an individuals sentence plays a key role in the presidents clemency decision; President Barack Obama, for example, commuted the sentences of many prisoners who, he felt, had served enough time. Trump didnt need to wait for a sentence.
snip - read the rest at the above link
malaise
(269,272 posts)The WP piece tonight where the Con tried to get Sessions to drop the case is a classic attempt at obstruction of justice. It provides an even stronger pattern of intent to obstruct for Mueller.
dchill
(38,606 posts)greeny2323
(590 posts)To be honest I think this is a bit of an overreaction. The Arpaio pardon is disgusting, but it doesn't involve Trump like the Russia investigation does. We can only hope the public reaction against Russia-related pardons would be fierce.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,125 posts)Zoonart
(11,897 posts)FROM what I've been reading since Last December...I have to think that theye is no way short of martial law and suspension if the Constitution that can stop the total destruction of the Trump criminal enterprise.
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)The GOP will be badly on the spot. If they refuse to impeach Trump at that point, they will nakedly be exposed for who they really are and it would resonate with a majority of the public.
dottie66
(59 posts)Isn't is correct that Trump can only pardon those with federal charges or investigations?
So my question is can say the State of New York come up with charges for Trump and his associates?
Can New York set up criminal charges on the state level so presidential pardons cannot apply?
I imagine the state charges would have to be different, maybe involving financial fraud?
If Trump and associates cannot be pardoned for state charges this would keep the pressure on them.
WePurrsevere
(24,259 posts)sweetroxie
(776 posts)as we speak. Lots of "good" money laundering cases took place in NY.
Welcome to DU.