Gene Lyons - The 'Lost Cause' Is Fake History
Full article posted with the permission of the author. -- DonIf your precious “Southern heritage” includes Swastikas, you may as well quit reading right here. But odds are astronomically high that it doesn’t. The vast majority of Southerners are as repelled by those goons as everybody else.
Rebel flags, in comparison, strike me as merely adolescent. Yee haw!
Well, it’s time to grow up.
If that annoys you, answer me this: Since when is Southern history strictly white history anyway?
Most of these Confederate monuments commemorate not so much the South’s glorious history of slavery and rebellion, but the bloody advent of Jim Crow laws between 1895 and 1925 or thereabouts. A time of “race riots”—i.e. black citizens massacred by white mobs across the region from Atlanta (1906) to Elaine, Arkansas (1919) to Tulsa (1921)—and of widespread lynching.
A time when the Klan-glorifying epic Birth of a Nation (1915) was screened at the White House for President Woodrow Wilson.
Ironically, rebel soldier statues were a Yankee industry. A factory in Connecticut manufactured the fool things by the hundreds and shipped them south to stand guard facing north on courthouse squares. A pointed reminder of exactly who was in charge. Specifically, the Ku Klux Klan.
There was nothing subtle about it. Photographs of Charlottesville’s equestrian statue of Robert E. Lee being dedicated in 1924 show that many in attendance wore KKK regalia. Contrary to the art critic in the White House, the statue’s not being destroyed. Plans are to relocate the monument to a park on the outskirts of town—just as Confederate statues taken down at the University of Texas will be placed in a museum, where they belong.
Latter day Confederate sympathizers who feel the need to genuflect to Fake History can visit them there. (Fake horsemanship too. I have a friend indignant about the bronze Gen. Lee’s cruelly over-cranking the bridle, something the real Lee—an excellent rider—would surely never have done.)
But make no mistake: Fake History it is. The treasured myth of the “Lost Cause” of freedom-loving patriots fighting bravely for self-determination and “states’ rights” can’t survive even a cursory reading of secessionist documents.
Here’s Alexander Stephens, Vice President of the Confederacy, arguing that its “cornerstone rests upon the great truth, that the Negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery—subordination to the superior race—is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first in the history of the world based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth.”
Nobody talks that way anymore except guys with Swastikas. It’s no exaggeration to say that the virulent racism they preach was invented precisely to rationalize the evil of slavery. Nevertheless, that’s what the Civil War, the bloodiest tragedy in American history, was all about. Protecting and defending chattel slavery, a grotesque remnant of human history. There’s nothing to be gained by pretending otherwise.
That said, I think there’s also no point in a struggle to tear down every half-forgotten Confederate memorial across the South. The war’s over and Jim Crow is gone; millions of Americans now living in the region have little interest in this aged feud. Besides, people have a right to their illusions.
As somebody who had no ancestors living in the United States at the time of the Civil War, maybe that’s easy for me to say. However, as an Irish-American who has always thought St. Patrick’s Day was nonsense (especially the vomiting in the gutters part), I’ve no sympathy with tribalized politics of any kind. Certain aspects of everybody’s past, their historical “identity” if you will, are best forgotten. Fighting over symbols gets you nowhere.
Writing in The Guardian, Lincoln biographer Sidney Blumenthal has a good idea. Instead of tearing monuments down, why not build new ones up?
“States and localities,” he suggests, “should establish commissions to build new monuments, statues and memorials, particularly across the South, to commemorate the heroes of the anti-slavery struggle, the unionists during the civil war, advocates for Reconstruction, foes of Jim Crow and champions of the civil rights movement.”
An example of what he means can be found in Arkansas, where I live. Yes, the State Capitol grounds feature the traditional monument to Johnny Reb. But also a striking monument to the Little Rock Nine, a group sculpture depicting the brave African-American students who defied a segregationist mob to enter Little Rock Central High School under the protection of the 101st Airborne in September 1957—Arkansas’ most historically significant event of the 20th century.
People visit the memorial from far and near. To my knowledge nobody finds it controversial.
Cemeteries too are appropriate places to memorialize the Union and Confederate dead. Meanwhile, if it’s history and heritage you want, visit Gettysburg, Vicksburg Memorial National Park, or Appomattox Courthouse among many others. Carefully-preserved Civil War battlefields are scattered across the South: real history, and solemn remembrance.
http://www.nationalmemo.com/lost-cause-fake-history/
= new reply since forum marked as read
I'm not a history major, but one thing I learned in school is that the Civil War was fought over secession, not slavery.
When the Southern states quit the Union and started their own Confederacy, it was a declaration of war. Abraham Lincoln had no choice but to fight the Confederacy even though it was the last thing he wanted to do. He used many strategies during that war, and the Emancipation Proclamation (freeing the slaves) was one of them. But Lincoln's motive was never to end slavery, it was to preserve the Union at all costs.
I think we're getting a little crazy now with all this talk about the neo-Nazi neo-Confederate white supremacy blah-blah-blah. But let's not rewrite history and pretend the Civil War was about something else. Lincoln and the Northern States went to war against the Confederacy in order to preserve the Union. When the Confederacy ended those same states were welcomed back with open arms.
Thanks for listening.
You sure as hell got that right!
The South seceded because they wanted to perpetuate slavery. We fought the war to preserve the Union torn apart because of slavery. Halfway through the war, Lincoln announced his intention to abolish slavery. Just before the war ended, slavery was legally abolished. Just after the war, the 14th and 15th Amendments were passed to ensure that no one would ever be forced to serve as a slave, except under legal penalty, and that all, including former slaves, would have the right to vote.
Did you not read the article cited in the OP?
It was about slavery. Sorry about that...
at the dedication of the statue of Lee in Charlottesville in 1924. the pointy white things do indeed look like KKK sheets, but they are not. According to the actual archivist and source of that image, those white things are PLUMES ON HATS worn by the boys in the Richmond Light Infantry Blues.
<a data-flickr-embed="true" href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/martindj1/36730894016/in/dateposted-friend/" title="lee_dedication"><img src="
" width="640" height="447" alt="lee_dedication"></a><script async src="//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
