Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

factfinder_77

(841 posts)
Wed Aug 2, 2017, 08:22 PM Aug 2017

Sanders singel payer cost: 1,38 trillion or 2,4 trillion or 2,5 trillion or 2,8 trillion A YEAR

Sanders pegs the price tag for his plan at $1.38 trillion per year during the first 10 years. This is based on an analysis by Gerald Friedman, an economist at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst.

However, "there is a great deal of disagreement and controversy" about this number, said Jonathan Oberlander, a health policy and management professor at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill.

Kenneth Thorpe, a professor of health policy and management at Emory University, put the cost at $2.4 trillion a year. A team from the Urban Institute put the number at $2.5 trillion a year. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget projected $2.8 trillion a year.

Why the differences in cost?

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/jul/21/how-expensive-would-single-payer-system-be/

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders singel payer cost: 1,38 trillion or 2,4 trillion or 2,5 trillion or 2,8 trillion A YEAR (Original Post) factfinder_77 Aug 2017 OP
Every country with a single payer system spends less per capita than the US. guillaumeb Aug 2017 #1
and how much does health insurance/care cost now? nt msongs Aug 2017 #2
oddly $1.38 trillion a year -- as Sanders own estimate for his single-payer plan. factfinder_77 Aug 2017 #4
I believe that does not include individual and employer premiums... Trial_By_Fire Aug 2017 #6
3.2 Trillion per year currently. Voltaire2 Aug 2017 #9
Using "cost" in this context is misleading PSPS Aug 2017 #3
That's a good bit less than we're spending now. QC Aug 2017 #5
Interestingly GaryCnf Aug 2017 #7
Since we spend over $3 trillion now ... davekriss Aug 2017 #8

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
1. Every country with a single payer system spends less per capita than the US.
Wed Aug 2, 2017, 08:29 PM
Aug 2017

With generally better health outcomes. All of these economic explanations that show single payer as being costlier are refuted by the reality of costs in the many other countries that have a single payer system.

Voltaire2

(13,245 posts)
9. 3.2 Trillion per year currently.
Wed Aug 2, 2017, 09:09 PM
Aug 2017

So at 1.38T comprehensive universal healthcare would be a huge savings.

PSPS

(13,628 posts)
3. Using "cost" in this context is misleading
Wed Aug 2, 2017, 08:32 PM
Aug 2017

Any such figure should be compared to what is being paid now by everyone via premiums plus other costs that a single-payer system would eliminate. The word "cost" would suddenly become "savings."

davekriss

(4,636 posts)
8. Since we spend over $3 trillion now ...
Wed Aug 2, 2017, 08:47 PM
Aug 2017

... on healthcare, even the worst case estimate is a bargain, saving over $200 billion a year. Great deal, if you ask me!

Ps/ U.S. GDP is approximately $18.5 trillion a year. We spend one sixth of it on healthcare. That's about $3.08 trillion a year.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sanders singel payer cost...