Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
2. He was elected by the R senators
Wed Aug 2, 2017, 05:32 PM
Aug 2017

The majority elects its majority leader in the Senate, just as the House elects its speaker.

trof

(54,256 posts)
4. Thanks, but I understand the'how'. I want to know the 'why'?
Wed Aug 2, 2017, 05:39 PM
Aug 2017

He doesn't seem to be charismatic at all.
Did he control huge PACs and a lot of campaign money to dole out?
I just wonder why they chose him.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
6. Seniority counts for a lot in the Senate
Wed Aug 2, 2017, 05:50 PM
Aug 2017

1. Who wants it?

and

2. Whose been around the longest?

Knowledge and expertise with the Senate rules is much more important than "charisma" for this job.

MiddleClass

(888 posts)
5. Not enough Democrats came out and voted for Feingold in Wisconsin
Wed Aug 2, 2017, 05:49 PM
Aug 2017

And not enough Democrats came out and voted for Katie McGinty in Pennsylvania.
Not enough Democrats in both states voted for Hillary.

So Republicans picked that turtle

haele

(12,688 posts)
7. Because he's patient and his strategy of obstruction "worked" when President Obama was in charge.
Wed Aug 2, 2017, 05:57 PM
Aug 2017

Ideologically, other than being a party man, he is "Southern Center-Right" - basically an Economic Moderate with some conservative social leanings - primarily in regards to social hierarchies (i.e., "nominally" bigoted while he plays the Southern Gentleman). He's a Chamber of Commerce/Old Boy Network type.

He also has seniority, a modicum of decent health for his age and had (at the time he became Majority Leader) very few potential skeletons in his closet. Also, he wasn't a raving religious nutjob that would turn the moderates off - he was stable and dependable in his positions.
Also, back in the Bush era, he could be "bipartisan" when he needed to be as a Minority Leader. In the Obama era, he was the darling of the word "NO" - and he was good at providing cover for the few moderates that still were in competitive Purple areas.

Looking back, he got his position when the Republicans weren't in charge of the Senate, and since the Teahadists would never agree with having a (gasp) Center or Center-Left Republican in charge, he gets to keep his job to keep the Republicans from imploding on their bile.

Haele

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why is Yertle the senate ...