General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat ARE LITMUS tests for Dems?
Pro Choice ?
Gun Control ?
Affirmative Action?
Anti Drug Control?
Anti using bombs to prevent wars... thinking of Korea?
Open Borders?
Anything else?
Single payer healthcare?
Before anyone hits the alert, I'm just asking question.
As an aside, I am prochoice, pro gun control, pro open borders, pro single payer.
And yesterday I had a post deleted because I said I was "confused" on Affirmative action. (seriously)
MyOwnPeace
(16,946 posts)the "Pugs" didn't have at least one:
"Are you mentally stable?"
Things could be SO different...................
Eliot Rosewater
(31,131 posts)do you have a D after your name? If so, and you are on the ballot in November, you get my vote.
JoeStuckInOH
(544 posts)Kahuna7
(2,531 posts)Rustyeye77
(2,736 posts)IS ANTI-CHOICE (Sen Bob Casey/PA) or against gun control (Sen Joe Manshun/ WV), is he still a D?
JoeStuckInOH
(544 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,131 posts)If you do you will vote for any democrat in NOVEMBER, (not in the primary but the election), IF, that is, you WANT the party to have power.
Atticus
(15,124 posts)have voted for?
Rustyeye77
(2,736 posts)I guess my point is .... are there Litmus tests anymore?
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)Silly to think anything else.
mcar
(42,426 posts)That is where I draw the line.
GreenPartyVoter
(72,384 posts)but I expect them to support choice.
mcar
(42,426 posts)uponit7771
(90,370 posts)... because of a couple of extremely important issues is a hard choice IMHO.
I'll still vote D but with my nose pinched
Rustyeye77
(2,736 posts)I understand what you're saying.
MineralMan
(146,341 posts)pandr32
(11,636 posts)Once we fill Congress and seats across the country we can work together to get things done!
Party affiliation is everything now
There is no such thIng as an acceptable republican.
The most conservative Democrat will still support 90% of the right issues.
angrychair
(8,749 posts)As an example here in Washington, our state Senate is controlled by republicans because 1 Dem is caucusing with Republicans. He even got reelected in 2014, almost completely based on the premise of "as long as they have a "D" after their name I will vote for them".
Our budget fight this year was dragged out for months because of 1 vote in the Senate.
I will never vote for a Democrat that does not support basic human rights
Basic human rights include but are not limited to:
Women's reproductive healthcare
Equal pay for equal work
Women workplace protections from harassment
LGBT equal access to public restrooms
LGBT workplace protection
LGBT right to marriage
Equality under the law for PoC and immigrants
Equal and fair access to vote
Failure to enforce just these items listed above not only does a disservice to Democrats but to all Americans
beaglelover
(3,496 posts)JoeStuckInOH
(544 posts)Maybe far left liberal ideals... but most celebrated Democrats are not "anti-drug control", "Anti-bomb", want single payer, or want "open" borders.
Those 4 are quite far left of most mainstream democrats.
Glorfindel
(9,740 posts)Using "democrat" as an adjective is a Republican slur. Thanks!
MineralMan
(146,341 posts)It depends. It changes over time.
HeartachesNhangovers
(816 posts)In California, where I lived for 54 years, definitely gun control. You will be a pariah if you are a Dem and have anything good to say about guns, gun owners or the NRA. Even Republicans in CA generally keep quiet about guns.
In WA state, where I live now, that is not the case at all. It's basically a gun-neutral state.
leftstreet
(36,117 posts)It's the ONLY issue that's motivated the GOP's OWN SUPPORTERS against them
The time is now
And yet, here we have party officials yattering on about reversing women's legal rights, hoping to get those misogynist votes they're so sore they lost
sarisataka
(18,857 posts)of what a person can tolerate in the endorsed candidate.
We had a group here that endorsed then Senator Mark Kirk over Tammy Duckworth based on an issue. It all depends on what is a person's "most important" issue.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)Primaries exist to try to find some agreement on what the Democratic candidate should stand for. When you're talking about local offices, it's up to those voters to decide what they demand without conditions and what they can live with.
I tend to focus on local elections and that is where my money goes if I donate. I have never given to the DNC because I want my money to go directly to the candidates of my choice and I don't always like the one size fits all platforms.
I am very much against the death penalty and in primaries I always hope to be able to vote for a candidate who opposes it. Still, I voted twice for a governor who had overseen 90% of all executions in my state. There were a lot of things I really disliked him for, but I would love to have him and some prolife Democrats whose districts have swung republican back.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)By definition, the diaphanous use of "litmus test" is simply the party platform. Seriously kids, it's not as difficult or as hard as you pretend it to be. Simply read the platform, and you'll have the litmus test.
Try this grade-school level primer...
Party Platform: a formal set of principal goals which are supported by a political party, in order to appeal to the general public, for the ultimate purpose of garnering the general public's support and votes about complicated topics or issues.
Then merely read the Democratic Party platform (https://www.democrats.org/party-platform).
"Before anyone hits alert" (Part II), I'm merely answering a question with as much sincerity as it was asked.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,450 posts)Not everybody lives in a state where Democrats are totally liberal and perfect on some important issues but, for the most part, they're on the right side of the issues of the day. I'm not always happy with some of their votes or stated positions but even a Blue Dog Democrat will vote the party line nearly all the time. Not even Joe Manchin, probably the most conservative Democrat we have at the moment, broke from the party to vote for any of the ACA Repeal bills. With Democrats, there is usually a chance that they can be swayed if they're leaning the wrong way on a vote/position. Republicans are just going to follow their party leadership like lemmings on most things and don't care what their more progressive constituents think.
Xipe Totec
(43,892 posts)still_one
(92,488 posts)say that Social Security and Medicare are the litmus test for any candidate to run as a Democrat.
The issue being discussed currently on DU is that the same criteria should apply to choice.
The reality is that it will be very difficult to convince someone who is strong choice or strong anti-choice otherwise. As can be seen from the posts here, with both sides presenting the reasons why their position is the correct one, no one's mind is going to be changed.
Those who believe that a women's right to choose is a human rights issue, and that should never be compromised, and those who believe that having a Democratic majority in Congress is critical to preventing what we are going through now, nothing is going to change those perspectives significantly.
irisblue
(33,041 posts)Azathoth
(4,611 posts)Because, by definition, they are condemning themselves to minority status in certain parts of the country. Some cultural issues, e.g. LGBT and minority rights, can be framed as objective legal principles, which means they could potentially be litmus tests. But despite court decisions, issues like gun control and abortion are frankly pure cultural issues with persuasive arguments on either side.
Dems should instead unify around basic principles: ensuring that everyone who works can earn enough money to support themselves and their families, ensuring that everyone has access to affordable healthcare, ensuring that workers' rights and unions are protected, etc. Anyone who takes issue with those basic propositions shouldn't call himself a Democrat.
mcar
(42,426 posts)It is a health issue.
Azathoth
(4,611 posts)demmiblue
(36,909 posts)YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)and so on.
David__77
(23,566 posts)I keep personal integrity and vote for those I suppose.
marlakay
(11,526 posts)Just the first 20 min where Whoppi does a great job of explaining to her group what it means.
I even learned a few things, like it wasn't set up just for minority's but for women of all races to get on the same playing field as men.
ismnotwasm
(42,022 posts)Or supporting policies that are bigoted.
Warpy
(111,407 posts)because they think human rights are up for discussion and can be eliminated if it means getting the bigot vote.
Rustyeye77
(2,736 posts)You can be anti-choice and be a D
You can be against Gun Control and be a D
You can be pro death penalty and be a D
You can be against single payer and be a D.
Can you be pro-military preventative war and be a D?--- I think yes
Can you question Affirmative Action and still be a D ?--- I think yes
Rustyeye77
(2,736 posts)some people here are anti -choice.(amazing)
But that's not a RW position.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)1) Never doing anything to make life worse for the poor;
2) Never leaving collective attacks on the poor or people of color or labor unchallenged;
3) Being less militaristic than the GOP(which doesn't have to mean being pacifist-just recognizing that even just wars are tragedies and that war is always the option to be avoided as much as possible);
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)The most conservative blue dog will caucus with our party more than any (R).
It's so goddamned simple, of course someone has to make it difficult.