Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow can you be Managing Director, Sole Shareholder and President
of a company and not have any responsibility for what it does? Romney either was or he wasn't all of these things. If he was, he's screwed because he lied, if he wasn't, he's screwed because he lied. One thing us "common people" have is common sense.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1404 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How can you be Managing Director, Sole Shareholder and President (Original Post)
Raven
Jul 2012
OP
Documents show Romney created five new investment partnerships at Bain after 1999
aint_no_life_nowhere
Jul 2012
#4
panader0
(25,816 posts)1. And getting a paycheck too?
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)2. If you are the CEO
no matter what you say or do in reality you are in all respects responsible for that company and what it does.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)3. You forgot
"How can you be Managing Director, Sole Shareholder and President"
...and signing "key documents."
So on the one hand Mitt Romney's campaign says Mitt Romney had nothing to do with Bain Capital whatsoever after February of 1999 ... and on the other hand his company continued to say that he was the sole owner and top corporate officer as late as 2002 and Romney himself signed key documents during that three year span. And the Romney campaign's explanation for this is that it's all just "a quirk in the law"?
More: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002935930
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)4. Documents show Romney created five new investment partnerships at Bain after 1999