Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Doreen

(11,686 posts)
Tue Jul 18, 2017, 10:41 PM Jul 2017

I have an odd question.

If this administration succeeded in taking health care in all fashions away, Social Security away, minimum wage away, housing away, any type of assistance away, and education away and resulted in millions of deaths of poor people related in one way or another to those things wouldn't that be considered a form of genocide?

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I have an odd question. (Original Post) Doreen Jul 2017 OP
I don't know how genocide is generally defined. CaliforniaPeggy Jul 2017 #1
Democide Solly Mack Jul 2017 #2
...their approval rating would still hold at 35-40%. They would approve from their graves. NRaleighLiberal Jul 2017 #3
A dictionary definition of genocide: The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2017 #4
I'd guess safeinOhio Jul 2017 #5

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,534 posts)
1. I don't know how genocide is generally defined.
Tue Jul 18, 2017, 10:43 PM
Jul 2017

But I don't think all those actions would actually be considered such.

I really don't know.

Solly Mack

(90,758 posts)
2. Democide
Tue Jul 18, 2017, 10:43 PM
Jul 2017

which includes genocide/mass murder.

And yes, calling it legal doesn't make it any less murder.

Some people might not know the difference between a clump of cells and a living person, but I do. (for any "pro-lifers" )

You'll sometimes hear the bullshit comment that republicans and Democrats want the same things, just disagree on how to achieve it.

If republican actions kill people - is that what Democrats want too?

I don't think so.

You send people to war, you know they could die. That's one thing.

You take away food, shelter, heat, and health care from people and they die - you don't get to pretend you didn't know that would happen.

And judging from the comments of many republicans about those most affected by the GOP callous indifference, they don't get to pretend it wasn't their intentions to begin with.







The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,615 posts)
4. A dictionary definition of genocide:
Tue Jul 18, 2017, 10:50 PM
Jul 2017

"The deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group." I don't think the repeal of all social safety net programs would fit that definition because it would not be the intentional extermination of a particular group like the Holocaust or the genocide of the Armenians by the Turks or our government's maltreatment and killing of Native Americans; but I believe it would be the willful neglect of the entire society in violation of Article I, section 8 of the Constitution, which grants Congress the power to "lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts, and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common defense and general Welfare of the United States."

safeinOhio

(32,641 posts)
5. I'd guess
Tue Jul 18, 2017, 11:56 PM
Jul 2017

at least half of those that will die because of a lack of health care will be be people that voted for him and Repub congress people.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I have an odd question.