Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

egbertowillies

(4,058 posts)
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 01:12 PM Jun 2017

The Democratic Party does not need a civil war now or later

I was a Bernie Sanders Delegate at the Democratic Convention in Philly. I supported the policies he articulated then and still do today. When the process was over, I proudly supported the nominee of the Democratic Party, Hillary Clinton, one hundred percent.

There are currently a lot of animosities between factions in the Democratic Party. Many women and men, especially baby boomers feel there would not be another opportunity in their lifetime to elect a woman. Most Bernie supporters are justifiably upset that the Democratic Establishment had a clear bias for Hillary Clinton.

Here are my thoughts.

https://egbertowillies.com/2017/06/22/democratic-party-civil-war/

Do you agree?

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Democratic Party does not need a civil war now or later (Original Post) egbertowillies Jun 2017 OP
The word "corporatism" lost me. Madam45for2923 Jun 2017 #1
The war is already over. leftofcool Jun 2017 #2
I wasn't here to see the fighting during the primaries, thank goodness. Buckeye_Democrat Jun 2017 #3
"Bias"? Hillary won, egberto. She got more votes than Bernie, and more than Trump. Hekate Jun 2017 #4
"Democratic Establishment"....is that like, voters? LexVegas Jun 2017 #5
I don't think it is justifiable. At all. NCTraveler Jun 2017 #6
Too Many Ads. Did Not Read. MineralMan Jun 2017 #7

Buckeye_Democrat

(14,855 posts)
3. I wasn't here to see the fighting during the primaries, thank goodness.
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 01:30 PM
Jun 2017

My impression is that those fights made some posters very salty, but maybe I'm wrong?

Bernie is more aligned with my relatively far-left attitudes, but I didn't even vote in the primaries because I would've been pretty happy with either of them. I was also worried, after hearing the mantra so many times, that Bernie might be too socialist to win a general election. Trump was totally unacceptable to me. Looking back on it, Bernie might've fared just as well if not better. I'm not sure and I don't want to dwell on that hypothetical situation now.

Hekate

(90,708 posts)
4. "Bias"? Hillary won, egberto. She got more votes than Bernie, and more than Trump.
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 01:32 PM
Jun 2017

The "coming civil war" is not being generated from Hillary's side.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
6. I don't think it is justifiable. At all.
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 01:34 PM
Jun 2017

"Most Bernie supporters are justifiably upset that the Democratic Establishment had a clear bias for Hillary Clinton. "

I think that shows how shallow they are and I don't think it is "most". I think it's a small fraction of those who voted for Sanders in the primary. Most of them get it.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
7. Too Many Ads. Did Not Read.
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 02:46 PM
Jun 2017

Sorry. It's your blog. You can quote your entire article here. I don't visit blogs with that many ads. Sorry.

Those are my thoughts.

Do you agree?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Democratic Party does...