Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevermypresident

(781 posts)
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 08:20 PM Apr 2017

North Korea (DPRK): "They therefore plan to win by striking quickly, by surprise, while South

Korea (ROK) are still mobilizing, US reinforcements are not yet in theatre,..."

Snipped:

"DPRK planners recognize their inferiority in technology and, after ROK mobilization, even in numbers. They understand that ROK/US forces will have air superiority initially, and (unless China intervenes) air supremacy within days. They therefore plan to win by striking quickly, by surprise, while ROK forces are still mobilizing, US reinforcements are not yet in theatre, and while our airpower is largely committed to overcoming the DPRK integrated air defense system and targeting WMD storage sites, launchers, and command, control, and communications (C3) networks."

http://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2017/04/25/thunder_run_to_seoul_assessing_north_koreas_war_plan_111241.html

This article is comprehensive and informative, IMO.


In my research on North Korea, I am learning just how little we know about North Korea. It is, after all, the Hermit country.


Another interesting viewpoint:

"Why North Korea Is a Black Hole for U.S. Intelligence"

http://observer.com/2017/04/north-korea-missile-test-cia/


9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
North Korea (DPRK): "They therefore plan to win by striking quickly, by surprise, while South (Original Post) Nevermypresident Apr 2017 OP
They're not planning for a win, they are planning for their own annihilation A HERETIC I AM Apr 2017 #1
"Starting a war" implies that N. Korea doesn't consider it self defense. Nevermypresident Apr 2017 #4
Cooler heads will prevail. A HERETIC I AM Apr 2017 #8
Under a normal president and Congress I would watch GP6971 Apr 2017 #2
When I was on active duty, most S. Korea assignments were unaccompanied. stevenleser Apr 2017 #3
I spent a lot of time in Korea GP6971 Apr 2017 #6
Interesting, thanks for the info, and that is crazy as we are now seeing. stevenleser Apr 2017 #7
I hate acronyms... blue sky at night Apr 2017 #5
3 things I hate; A HERETIC I AM Apr 2017 #9

A HERETIC I AM

(24,365 posts)
1. They're not planning for a win, they are planning for their own annihilation
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 08:27 PM
Apr 2017

There is too much money involved between S. Korea and China for China to allow the DPRK to do anything so stupid as to start a war. The Chinese must know they can't overtly influence Trump and they sure as hell don't want a nuclear exchange in their front yard.

The North has done this sort of thing over and over in the last decades. They rattle a saber until they get money and food.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China%E2%80%93South_Korea_relations#Present

Nevermypresident

(781 posts)
4. "Starting a war" implies that N. Korea doesn't consider it self defense.
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 08:36 PM
Apr 2017

"The North has done this sort of thing over and over in the last decades. They rattle a saber until they get money and food."

What's different from the past is DJT.

GP6971

(31,133 posts)
2. Under a normal president and Congress I would watch
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 08:27 PM
Apr 2017

for the evacuation order of non-essential personnel and DoD dependents. That's when we worry.

But nothing is normal with this faux and illegitimate president and congress.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
3. When I was on active duty, most S. Korea assignments were unaccompanied.
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 08:30 PM
Apr 2017

You couldn't take dependents, etc. There were exceptions but I don't think there would need to be a big evac.

GP6971

(31,133 posts)
6. I spent a lot of time in Korea
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 08:49 PM
Apr 2017

with the military and now as a DoD contractor...all TDY. My son was stationed with the 7th Cav at Camp Hovie up close to the DMZ. Area 1, north of Seoul, really discouraged command sponsored tours. Recently (last 10 years or so) they have approved more requests which really surprised me. The kicker is that you have to agree to a 2 year tour.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
7. Interesting, thanks for the info, and that is crazy as we are now seeing.
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 08:56 PM
Apr 2017

I would hate to be on active duty in S. Korea right now with accompanied dependents. I would really be worried about them.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»North Korea (DPRK): "The...