New Nukes for No Money Down! Why Should Nuclear Loan Guarantees Cost Less Than Student Loans?
http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/07/03/why-should-nuclear-loan-guarantees-cost-less-than-student-loans/
July 03, 2012
New Nukes for No Money Down!
Why Should Nuclear Loan Guarantees Cost Less Than Student Loans?
by HARVEY WASSERMAN
The Department of Energy wants to give the Southern Company a nuclear power loan guarantee at better interest rates than you can get on a student loan. And unlike a home mortgage, there may be no down payment.
<snip>
The documents show the DOE has intended to charge the Southern a credit subsidy fee of one to 1.5%, far below the rates you would be required to pay for buying a house or financing an education.
On a package 15 times bigger than what the federal government gave the failed solar company Solyndra, Southern would be required to pay somewhere between $17 million and $52 million. Advocates argue the fee is so low that it fails to adequately take into account the financial risks of the project. Numerous financial experts have estimated the likely fail rate for new nuclear construction to be at 50% or greater.
Furthermore, since a primary lender would be the Federal Financing Bank, the taxpayer is directly on the hook. Guaranteed borrowings are not supposed to exceed 70% of the projects projected costs, but its unclear what those costs will actually turn out to be, as the public has been given no firm price tag on the project.
There is apparently no cash down payment being required of Southern as it seems the loan is designed to be secured with the value of the reactors themselves, whatever that turns out to be. In the unlikely event they are finished, liability from any catastrophe will revert to the public once a small private fund is exhausted.
Southern wanted the terms of the DOE offer kept secret, and we still dont know everything about it. But in March, a federal circuit court judge ordered that the public had a right to know at least some of the details.
<snip>