General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKAREN HANDEL background - how she tried to screw Planned Parenthood
and wound up screwing the Susan G. Komen outfit.
http://www.politico.com/story/2012/02/karen-handel-komen-official-resigns-after-planned-parenthood-dispute-072550
Fortunately, she failed there.
Let's make sure she fails AGAIN, this next time.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,152 posts)is bound and determined to control women and kill the ones who refuse control.
dalton99a
(81,708 posts)niyad
(113,989 posts)calimary
(81,610 posts)niyad
(113,989 posts)calimary
(81,610 posts)niyad
(113,989 posts)calimary
(81,610 posts)Frustrating, isn't it?
I'm always amused whenever Supreme Court discussions come up - where someone argues that such-and-such is "settled law," the implication being that "no, no need to go back and revisit it or change it or anything..." This has certainly been said about marriage equality and many other issues in which litigation has come up. So, following that logic, isn't it true that Roe v Wade is also "settled law"? "Settled law" is, after all, "SETTLED law," is it not? And yet we have about 40 years of extremists constantly trying to fuck with it.
niyad
(113,989 posts)the courts would protect us. some people actually believed that bs.