General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumskimbutgar
(21,285 posts)That's a pretty well reasoned explanation that's simple to understand.
dchill
(38,626 posts)BainsBane
(53,137 posts)He wouldn't have announced the filibuster if he didn't. He's letting some of the Senators in red states vote yes, but he knows they have enough. I think I'm right on that.
SaschaHM
(2,897 posts)After the significant failure of the Republican party to control it's members on Trumpcare, Schumer wouldn't commit to an embarrassing failure if he didn't have the votes.
herding cats
(19,569 posts)He's letting those in vulnerable seats exit so we live to keep fighting after 2018 & 2020, but this battle is ours now. I believe this is the strategy.
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)Well said.
a kennedy
(29,779 posts)spooky3
(34,531 posts)zentrum
(9,866 posts)I can't quite tell if the list means they won't filibuster or they won't vote or commit to voting no.
HAVENT SAID (6)
Sen. Michael Bennet (Colo.)
Sen. Chris Coons (Del.)
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (Calif.)
Sen. Angus King (I-Maine)
Sen. Bob Menendez (N.J.)
Sen. Mark Warner (Va.)
SQUISHY (2)*
Sen. Ben Cardin (Md.)
Sen. Patrick Leahy (Vt.) (I assume he's voting No but won't filibuster)
And 3 Dems are voting yes on Gorsuch which is beyond infuriating.
I'm going to call all of them in the morning.
SunSeeker
(51,811 posts)lamp_shade
(14,853 posts)Cha
(298,077 posts)Mahalo, HH