Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So what became of this "nepotism clause" (Original Post) Heartstrings Mar 2017 OP
I know! Rhiannon12866 Mar 2017 #1
When the book is written, it will be listed under Fantasy and Science Fiction. Arkansas Granny Mar 2017 #2
When I was listening to the news earlier, I was wondering how history will treat all this Rhiannon12866 Mar 2017 #4
I think they figure if they don't accept pay... WePurrsevere Mar 2017 #3
Laws and rules aren't made for them. Rhiannon12866 Mar 2017 #5
I agree. I truly think that they feel they're above the laws... WePurrsevere Mar 2017 #7
Their behavior is appalling - to the point it's hard to believe. Rhiannon12866 Mar 2017 #10
It takes a bit to royally tick me off now but... WePurrsevere Mar 2017 #16
Every day is a new episode of The Twilight Zone. sarcasmo Mar 2017 #20
I've often thought if this was a movie, it would be viewed as just too far fetched to believe Rhiannon12866 Mar 2017 #23
Remember Leona Helsmley? "We don't pay taxes. Only the little people pay taxes" KittyWampus Mar 2017 #21
The nepotism clause does not apply to the President. former9thward Mar 2017 #14
There are excellent reasons... WePurrsevere Mar 2017 #17
It may not be a good idea but it is constitutional. former9thward Mar 2017 #19
Unfortunately our forefathers... WePurrsevere Mar 2017 #22
And Mrs. Clinton was an experienced lawyer Rhiannon12866 Mar 2017 #24
Well, section (d) might make it possible.. Atman Mar 2017 #15
The one positive thing about Trump's presidency is, (if we all ever come out of this nightmare), OnDoutside Mar 2017 #6
I would like to add Heartstrings Mar 2017 #11
Good call. OnDoutside Mar 2017 #12
That's what I'd like to know! nt raccoon Mar 2017 #8
Secretary of Solicitation Norbert9 Mar 2017 #9
Rules/Law don't apply to Republicans. dae Mar 2017 #13
He is getting paid full salary after saying he wouldn't, so I don't believe her claim either wishstar Mar 2017 #18

Rhiannon12866

(205,289 posts)
1. I know!
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 05:28 AM
Mar 2017

Today, JFK wouldn't be able to have RFK in his cabinet! And what are her credentials, anyway? Previous government experience? Educational background and qualifications? If this ridiculous horror show was a movie, nobody would believe it...

Rhiannon12866

(205,289 posts)
4. When I was listening to the news earlier, I was wondering how history will treat all this
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 06:25 AM
Mar 2017

If they still teach history, that is. Obviously, Trump never took a history class, so he'll think it isn't necessary - like health care and food.

WePurrsevere

(24,259 posts)
3. I think they figure if they don't accept pay...
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 06:16 AM
Mar 2017

The nepotism thing just goes *poof*. The way I'm reading section c I'd say they're wrong.

Here's the law:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/3110

b) A public official may not appoint, employ, promote, advance, or advocate for appointment, employment, promotion, or advancement, in or to a civilian position in the agency in which he is serving or over which he exercises jurisdiction or control any individual who is a relative of the public official. An individual may not be appointed, employed, promoted, or advanced in or to a civilian position in an agency if such appointment, employment, promotion, or advancement has been advocated by a public official, serving in or exercising jurisdiction or control over the agency, who is a relative of the individual.
(c) An individual appointed, employed, promoted, or advanced in violation of this section is not entitled to pay, and money may not be paid from the Treasury as pay to an individual so appointed, employed, promoted, or advanced.
(d) The Office of Personnel Management may prescribe regulations authorizing the temporary employment, in the event of emergencies resulting from natural disasters or similar unforeseen events or circumstances, of individuals whose employment would otherwise be prohibited by this section.

Rhiannon12866

(205,289 posts)
5. Laws and rules aren't made for them.
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 06:34 AM
Mar 2017

I listened to Jimmy Carter's autobiography, "A Full Life: Reflections at 90," again recently. I have it on audio (read by the author ) and listen to it in my car. He talks about having to put his family farm into a "blind trust" during his presidency. He gave up a brilliant career in the Navy to take it over after his father died - and Rosalynn wasn't happy. He received no reports while he was president and when he returned to Plains in 1981 he learned that it had been "mismanaged" and there had been three years of drought so he almost lost not only the business, but also their home. He was able to pay off most of the debt by selling the Carter Warehouse, but they had to start over. But those were the rules and he accepted them when he took the job.

WePurrsevere

(24,259 posts)
7. I agree. I truly think that they feel they're above the laws...
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 06:45 AM
Mar 2017

Hopefully in a short time they'll learn that they're not.

Jimmy Carter rocks. He's one of those people that defines 'class' (and Christian too IMO). TrumpInc is obviously the absolute antithesis of him.

Rhiannon12866

(205,289 posts)
10. Their behavior is appalling - to the point it's hard to believe.
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 07:45 AM
Mar 2017

He respects nothing and no one, not the best quality for a president. And who voted for his entire adult extended family? The "professionals" he's chosen are horrible enough!

I've always been a fan of Jimmy Carter. My brother picked on me because he was my candidate from the time we learned who he was. But I didn't realize how much I agreed with him on pretty much everything until I listened to his whole story. He really has led a fascinating life. And he never retired - from anything! The Carter Center is still working to make things better for people all over the world - and he worked with every president who followed him whenever he was asked - and often volunteered, LOL. He even met with John Kerry when he became SOS because he still wants to work for peace in the Middle East. And now we have Trump who wants to send his son-in-law...

WePurrsevere

(24,259 posts)
16. It takes a bit to royally tick me off now but...
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 08:35 AM
Mar 2017

Trump and the GOP do it on a daily basis because they push my 'bleeding heart', 'harm none' and 'love thy neighbor' buttons.

I'm a fan of his too. He was the first presidential candidate I was finally old enough to actually vote for (1980). It has always ticked me off that, IMO, he's been so very underrated as a president and that some people played up his kindness of spirit to be a weakness.

former9thward

(31,997 posts)
14. The nepotism clause does not apply to the President.
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 08:23 AM
Mar 2017

Bill Clinton appointed Hillary Clinton to chair a health care task force. He was sued as a violation of the nepotism clause among other things. The DC Court of Appeals ruled that Congress may not restrict a president's ability under the Constitution to make appointments. The nepotism clause does not apply to the White House.

ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS, INC., et
al., Appellees, v. Hillary Rodham CLINTON, et al., Appellants. 997 F.2d 898 (1993)

So Trump has Bill Clinton to thank....

WePurrsevere

(24,259 posts)
17. There are excellent reasons...
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 09:23 AM
Mar 2017

for anti-nepotism laws in government. I would argue that, court ruling for a spouse aside, the spirit as well as letter of the law has been violated in Trump appointing any of his children (incl in-laws) to official positions in the WH.

IME a spouse is also not quite the same as other relations since spouses are often seen as an extension of each other to a degree so there's a certain amount of vetting of the candidates spouses. There's not so much, if any, of their children since we normally don't think of them in quite the same way.

Beyond legalities it's simply not a good idea. It's one thing to involve your children in a regular family business, it's a very different thing to treat our gov like it's your business.
Apparently the case isn't cut and dried to others either:
http://www.npr.org/2017/01/05/508382236/trump-relatives-potential-white-house-roles-could-test-anti-nepotism-law
http://www.salon.com/2017/01/10/no-consensus-on-anti-nepotism-law-and-kushner-appointment-2/

former9thward

(31,997 posts)
19. It may not be a good idea but it is constitutional.
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 09:36 AM
Mar 2017

Both your links mention the 1993 case (as a "court ruling&quot and then just ignore it. The DC Court of Appeals is not just a "court ruling". The DC court is second to the Supreme Court in power and more Justices of the Supreme Court come from the DC Court than any other.

WePurrsevere

(24,259 posts)
22. Unfortunately our forefathers...
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 12:26 PM
Mar 2017

who wrote the Constitution weren't great psychics. If nepotism is allowed for a president and it can be done with zero checks than this is one of those times they apparently didn't foresee the future clearly and take action to protect.

I can't help but wonder why the people in the articles ignored the 1993 decision as you pointed out. I haven't read up on the case nor the wording of the decision, etc so perhaps there's something in that that left the door open a crack?

Rhiannon12866

(205,289 posts)
24. And Mrs. Clinton was an experienced lawyer
Fri Mar 31, 2017, 04:40 AM
Mar 2017

Trump's son-in-law sells real estate and I'm not sure what experience and qualifications his daughter brings to the job??

Atman

(31,464 posts)
15. Well, section (d) might make it possible..
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 08:27 AM
Mar 2017
"...temporary employment, in the event of emergencies resulting from natural disasters or similar unforeseen events or circumstances,..."

It could be argued that Trump's election was an unforeseen natural disaster and an emergency.

OnDoutside

(19,956 posts)
6. The one positive thing about Trump's presidency is, (if we all ever come out of this nightmare),
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 06:36 AM
Mar 2017

we are getting to know a lot more of the failings of the American Electoral and Executive system, which need to be fixed.

No more unofficial advisors
Complete financial disclosure of all Presidential Candidates
Complete financial disclosure of all Governmental Secretaries
etc

wishstar

(5,269 posts)
18. He is getting paid full salary after saying he wouldn't, so I don't believe her claim either
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 09:29 AM
Mar 2017

I expect in a month or two we will hear that she has to be paid to be considered an employee

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So what became of this "n...