General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSanders to Perez: 'The same-old, same-old is not working'
The Hill"I congratulate Tom Perez on his election as chairman of the Democratic National Committee and look forward to working with him," Sanders said in a statement.
"At a time when Republicans control the White House, the U.S. House, U.S. Senate and two-thirds of all statehouses, it is imperative that Tom understands that the same-old, same-old is not working and that we must open the doors of the party to working people and young people in a way that has never been done before," the lawmaker added.
<more>
http://thehill.com/homenews/news/321194-sanders-congratulated-perez-on-dnc-chairmanship
Of course, Senator Sanders is correct. We need to really 'go for it' and do everything we can for the 99%. We have to be BOLD and give Americans something to vote FOR.
Cary
(11,746 posts)Last edited Sat Feb 25, 2017, 10:53 PM - Edit history (1)
Out with the old. Sowing discord and discontent. Gee, who would have thunk that this isn't a good idea?
Well maybe now Bernie will stop sowing discord and discontent.
nolabear
(41,936 posts)Just once I'd like to hear "How can I help?" Sure, stick to principles but don't treat the Democratic Chair like a child.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)He does lobby with the Democrats - and if he had won the primary he might have become one!
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)DURHAM D
(32,606 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)...as an Independent.
Buddyblazon
(3,014 posts)Fundraising for the Kansas Democrats.
Check yourself.
Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)...Senator Sanders works every day for Democratic values.
brer cat
(24,524 posts)he doesn't own them, nor does he always practice them. His arrogance in lecturing Tom Perez is appalling. Bernie lost, and the majority of Democrats don't give a rat's ass what he thinks.
I saw the tweet earlier today and could not miss the condescension.
I think Keith would of had a better chance of winning if BS had not turned it into a proxy fight with Obama/Clinton.
nolabear
(41,936 posts)Too much hard-lining imo.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)I am so over his sanctimonious "I alone am the keeper of Democratic principles but am too good to join the party" posturing.
Larkspur
(12,804 posts)Perez represents the Democratic wing that raised a billion dollars against Trump and lost the WH. It is also the wing that drove the Party into national minority status.
Perez is an uninspiring pick for DNC Chair.
OnionPatch
(6,169 posts)Maybe not the majority but a whole lot of them, especially the youth, the future of the party.
brer cat
(24,524 posts)is people of color. Tom Perez is the right person at the right time, and he doesn't need a lecture from Bernie or his supporters on what he needs to do.
OnionPatch
(6,169 posts)of a whole big segment of Democrats.
FYI, I'm 57 years old and a lifelong Democrat who has often been active for the party. It's pretty insulting to be told my opinion doesn't count.
brer cat
(24,524 posts)There are certainly some progressives who don't consider any opinion that doesn't toe a certain line to be valid, but that isn't what I think. Opinions from other Democrats are always welcome. However, I certainly do make a clear distinction between expressing opinions and condescending, finger-wagging lectures, especially from people who are not members of the Democratic Party. Tom Perez is an adult, demonstrably capable of managing the job to which he was elected. He does not need or deserve to have to listen to a disrespectful rant from anyone telling him how to do his job. I think that is pretty insulting.
OnionPatch
(6,169 posts)I think he just wants to make sure the issues his supporters (who are many) care about are going to be represented.
The hatred for Bernie on this site is nauseating.
brer cat
(24,524 posts)and Hillary.
OnionPatch
(6,169 posts)At least they can be mentioned here in a post without someone bashing them within five minutes.
Buddyblazon
(3,014 posts)When he was fundraising for the Kansas Democrats.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Let me share what I've learned in the past few years. Be VERY, VERY careful of lauding Senator Sander's efforts. His efforts during the primaries drew THE biggest crowds anyone has seen in recent times. But that means NOTHING. Even tho Sanders caucuses with the Dems every time, his attempt at delivering a populist enticement (as opposed to a corporate come-on) is why we have Trump in the White House. Just be very careful of making Sanders look good. It's a sure way to get posts pulled and ultimately lose your privileges here.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)synergie
(1,901 posts)it's weird how he said he'd stay a Dem and then just forgot that he and his staff said that.
George II
(67,782 posts)Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)It's in the Dem platform. But basically, I see Dem values like what FDR did, which is having a successful healthy and prosperous middleclass. It's all about the people...
How about you?
George II
(67,782 posts)....the Democratic Party for not living up to "Democratic values" yet use the Democratic platform to illustrate what those values are.
My head is spinning!
Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)Quite the stretch there George...
George II
(67,782 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)You need to justify your statement before anything else.
randome
(34,845 posts)Oh, wait, there really isn't one, is there? Well, I have some advice for Sanders: join up or shut up. Must be nice to have the advantages of being a Democrat without having to commit to anything.
aikoaiko
(34,163 posts)He's a bonafide Democratic leader with the gravitas to speak to this issue.
https://democrats.senate.gov/leadership/#.WLJC-pI8KhA
G_j
(40,366 posts)so helpful. Nevermind answering, you made your point.
Enjoy your poison.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)Check these ideas out. You might not want him to "shut up".
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Sanders owes Perez an apology.
otohara
(24,135 posts)then he and his people will lend a hand.
I swear they are already on DemExit part II over on Twitter.
They've turned on Ellison too now I guess.
ananda
(28,836 posts)If the Dems had had a 50-state strategy and a movement
like Our Revolution, we wouldn't need any advice or
admonishments!
Now I hope we do have a strong 50-state strategy, and btw,
Sanders is absolutely right!
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,781 posts)PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)face palm
calm down kids
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)Your choice.
mwooldri
(10,301 posts)In my book better than some Democrats in name only.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)....is help us, the ordinary, non-corporate people. His organizing to gain elections in small local seats is what the Party in fact has neglected for two decades. And they are all Democratic candidates.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)Sander's sage advice. I would not have thought of his comments as being a "lecture" nor would I have felt a need for an apology.
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)Instead of tossing in remarks from the outside...
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)Senator Sanders is a (now) well known and always a fighter for Democratic principles in the Senate and caucuses with the Dems...
randome
(34,845 posts)Without bothering to join the team. Sort.of like parents telling the coaches of their 6th grade daughter's soccer team what they're doing wrong.
Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)And decades of public service serving the 99%.
randome
(34,845 posts)He wants to be independent then that's what he is: not part of the Democratic Party. He can vote however the hell he wants but the days of him trying to control us are long gone.
Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)He is fighting for the people... I know, ick....
randome
(34,845 posts)He can work all he wants and I welcome that. But he needs to shut the hell up about things he knows nothing about. Specifically, the Democratic Party.
It's time for Democrats to unite and stop letting outsiders have their cake and eat it too.
Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)And no, Senator Sanders, in my world, can speak as loud and often as he can!
You see, I am a believer in TR/FDR/JFK Democrats!
Response to Talk Is Cheap (Reply #29)
Post removed
Cary
(11,746 posts)No one is stopping you.
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)and FDR and JFK are hardly the same sort of Democrat, other than they were both born into great wealth and both presided over Jim Crow.
Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)FDR transformed America. JFK was cut down to early in life but was a great man and president.
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)There is no such thing as a TR Democrat.
The Progressive era: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Era
Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)And that is a good thing. That is why I included TR.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)JHan
(10,173 posts)He isn't Saint Sanders of Fighting For the People.
He was lecturing, it was unnecessary.
But I can let it fly, and I'm sure Tom wouldn't think of responding in kind.
JustAnotherGen
(31,781 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)BainsBane
(53,016 posts)Buddyblazon
(3,014 posts)Fundraising for the Kansas Democrats.
Check yourself.
DURHAM D
(32,606 posts)That is a "Trump" number.
He had a good crowd but it was about half that number.
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)Yes, he works with the party, loves to criticize the party but he is not a member of the party. Unless he needs to be for a nomination or something. Never understood the halfway in mindset. I'm in for a penny, in for a pound. Always have been. Not a halfway kind of girl.
Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)I'm guessing that you completely agree and support a Democrat like Manchin...?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)And that seems to be the only thing that matters here on this forum - right?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Cary
(11,746 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)So, I have to rely on people's post... and the truth....and the facts...
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)Hekate
(90,562 posts)That's how it works, Chasstev365. My Democratic Congressman represents my district. He doesn't represent Vermont. Our issues are really different from those of Vermont. My Congressman is not a Blue Dog, but he sure isn't an old white man from 3,000 miles away, either.
I know it's hard, but the Dem Party is a big tent, and each district is different. It would help if Bernie would behave like a friend who likes the rest of us and not like a cranky old neighbor who can't admit that anyone else can do anything competently.
burrowowl
(17,632 posts)and not a Dino!
Hekate
(90,562 posts)...because we are at war and jingoism is at an all-time high?
FDR is one of my heroes, too, but the amount of fantasizing about him that goes on here is more than a little dismaying. He was far from perfect. The difference between heroes and saints is that heroes are all-too-fallible human beings who nevertheless manage to do great deeds that benefit many people.
If FDR were alive today, I shudder to think what fault would be found with him at DU.
Buddyblazon
(3,014 posts)Purporting he was for Japanese American internment? Did you really just go there?
Hekate
(90,562 posts)...it makes me a bit sarcastic.
What exactly about FDR makes him the be-all and end-all of the values of Democratic values of the 21st Century? And what exactly about the current Senator makes him the be-all and end-all of New Deal values?
I've said not one word about Sanders's religion or ethncity -- nor about FDR's. They are both fallible human beings, not saviors. One of them achieved greatness in his lifetime.
Demsrule86
(68,469 posts)theglammistress
(348 posts)Put the D behind his name. Period.
Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)aikoaiko
(34,163 posts)He is doing exactly what he is supposed to be doing.
https://democrats.senate.gov/leadership/#.WLJC-pI8KhA
delisen
(6,042 posts)juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)Response to juxtaposed (Reply #104)
Post removed
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)Not the other way around.
Back when I officially threw in with the Dems it was because I wanted to help make it better and I couldn't do that from the outside. I joined the effort and had great, productive adventures from there. All those who have recently come into politics in my world simply take for granted all the established things that came into being in those days. It was amazing really. None of it would've happened if I hadn't stepped up, joined and gotten busy.
Just sayin'.
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)ciaobaby
(1,000 posts)The hate for Bernie on this site is really very sad.
nolabear
(41,936 posts)Dream Girl
(5,111 posts)They should be doing. He was a real pain in the ass.
Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)Not a very positive post for a Senator working every day for the 99%..
If your measure of the man is that he votes with Democrats 99% of the time, then how do you reconcile your disaffection with the Democratic Party?
Anyone else see cognitive dissonance?
Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)Talk about deflection....
Cary
(11,746 posts)You chastise us for being "Third Way," "corporatist," or whatever.
I am confused. I have no idea when or how I became any of these things. I love my Senators, Dick Durbin and Tammy Duckworth. I love my representative, Jan Shakowsky.
I would vote with them 100% of the time. Yet radical leftists pepper us with these epithets and chastise us for not being something or another.
Bernie is ok, but I don't get the cult of personality and I really don't get whatever your point is here, especially if your measure is that he votes with my people 99% of the time. Why wouldn't you stop the nonsense and just be.one of us, period?
Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)Transference?
Cary
(11,746 posts)You may not have used those exact words, in your current incarnation, but I'm sure you have because you have said as much in substance. And it doesn't matter. You have not refuted my point or given me any confidence that you're the least bit interested in reaching out beyond your ideological bubble.
I am a mainstream Democrat. You have an agenda that will never see the light of day with an insistance on ideological purity. And I make my suggestion based on my admission that I don't understand your ideological purity. It makes no sense to me. I am just looking to move forward instead of backward.
Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)And that is exactly why I continue to fight for Democratic principles because
there are people who say that my "agenda that will never see the light of day".
Once again, the things I fight for are what a MAJORITY of AMERICANS want.
May I suggest that you have a more 'ideological purity' than I do...
azmom
(5,208 posts)jalan48
(13,842 posts)LexVegas
(6,031 posts)NoGoodNamesLeft
(2,056 posts)And why do we need so many threads about he who must not be named? You don't see a dozen new damn threads started about Hillary every day. I am SO turned off with that it's not even funny. I wish he would just go away.
progressoid
(49,951 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)That's not a trait of a 'natter'...
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I wanted somebody too and I didn't get what I wanted either. I hope we learned our lesson and only let actual democrats run in the future
randome
(34,845 posts)Since you want to bring up the primary again.
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)Or do you just hate everything about him even though he supports the Democratic party?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)If he can dish he can take....
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)Enlighten me.
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)Not that that will ever be good enough.
He works with Dems, raises money for them, and supports them, but I'm guessing that none of that matters.
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)Do you mean back before his presidential run, when he headlined big dollar fundraising retreats On Palm Beach and Martha's Vineyard? Or are you speaking about recently?
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)Undercutting him with condescending advice wrapped up in a show of support.
murielm99
(30,717 posts)And in her case, it was lukewarm, too little, too late.
I hope this fight is over now. It was just a proxy war, an excuse to use Perez and Ellison and stand-ins to re-fight the primary. We have to be unified, and get on with our battles against trump and taking back Congress.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)He spoke the truth.
mcar
(42,278 posts)lapucelle
(18,187 posts)of Perez's hand is not a good way to mend the breach.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)He really needs to get in or out.
CousinIT
(9,225 posts)50 Shades Of Blue
(9,928 posts)lapucelle
(18,187 posts)Today was a good day for Democrats. There was no reason to shit on it. Sanders played right into the divisive narrative that the media and the Republicans are pimping about our party.
The day belonged to Perez and Ellison. The day was about "stronger together". Democrats were happy that seems to be new light on the horizon in the person of Pete Buttigieg. Sanders stepped on all of it to make the day about himself.
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)Do you not agree with Democratic principles?
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)Having sanders delegates yell obscenities to my daughter because she betrayed her generation colors my feelings. Sanders did nothing to control his delegates and stopped his state chairs from removing Sanders delegates who engaged in such conduct.
Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)Everyone has stories to tell...
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)Each candidate had the right to vet their delegates and all of the Clinton delegates were carefully vetted. I know this because I helped vet my state's Clinton's delegates. Sanders did not vet his delegates at all except to remove one duly elected delegate at the Texas state convention because that delegate would not say that he hated Hillary Clinton. There were some Sanders delegates in my state's delegation who had some real issues. We moved some female delegates away from one delegate because he came to hitting one of the female delegates on the third night. At the last night of the convention, this delegate was so upset that he was vibrating and ripped his shirt into pieces in an attempt to get attention. The Sanders delegate chair would not remove or revoke this delegate's credentials because sanders would not respond to his request.
A number of the younger Sanders delegates marched in together with locked arms to demand that the Clinton delegates condemn Clinton and vote for Sanders. That did not go over well. I guess by your standards we were mean for not respecting the feelings of the sanders delegates who thought that if they held their breath they could change the outcome.
Your claim about Clinton delegates is truly wrong and offensive. I was there. You were not.
Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)Gothmog
(144,939 posts)Where are you getting your so-called stories?
George II
(67,782 posts)SaschaHM
(2,897 posts)Gothmog
(144,939 posts)My appeals were successful
Your post was appreciated.
George II
(67,782 posts)Gothmog
(144,939 posts)Gothmog
(144,939 posts)In any event. I am very happy that Tom Perez is the new DNC chair
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)There's a BIG problem! BERNIE IS CORRECT!
Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)And spot on...
chwaliszewski
(1,514 posts)BainsBane
(53,016 posts)and Clinton never adopted that tactic. Populists rely on charisma and sometimes demagoguery to advance themselves without fundamentally challenging the structural inequality of capitalism.
Clinton is a traditional liberal. She never pretended to be a folk hero.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... a liar who depended on the gullibility of voters. (I also believe the media failed the public as well.)
Hello alerter: Of course I'm referring to Trump.
nolabear
(41,936 posts)Maybe Bernie would have made a difference and maybe not. But he needs to work with people, not consescend.
ciaobaby
(1,000 posts)Hekate
(90,562 posts)uponit7771
(90,304 posts)Lol
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)johnp3907
(3,730 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,757 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Thank you.
Hekate
(90,562 posts)Hekate
(90,562 posts)StubbornThings
(259 posts)You talking about that party.
Hekate
(90,562 posts)"That party," indeed. "The losing party," indeed.
Hillary Clinton got 3,000,000 more votes than the Trojan Horse. Do not blame her for this loss.
"Every time"? Screw that noise. We elected Barack Obama in the two elections prior.
Facts are stubborn things -- you might give some more thought to your conclusions.
StubbornThings
(259 posts)Obama won twice since 2008. The Republicans have won once if you're only counting the Presidential race.
But, what about the others.
In 2009 Democrats held 60 seats in the US Senate.
Currently they are at 48.
In 2009 Democrats held 235 seats in the US House of Representatives.
Currently there are at 192.
Under President Obama, Democrats have lost over 900 state legislature seats, 12 governors, 69 House seats, 13 Senate seats.
Conclusive enough.
SaschaHM
(2,897 posts)aikoaiko
(34,163 posts)Did he wait too long in the past on something?
Response to aikoaiko (Reply #60)
SaschaHM This message was self-deleted by its author.
aikoaiko
(34,163 posts)pnwmom
(108,959 posts)for him to win was gone by early May.
Response to pnwmom (Reply #88)
Post removed
aikoaiko
(34,163 posts)Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)for more than temporary political convenience (and complicit election spoiler), and stops just being a muppet balcony heckler from the outside, he'll be worth listening to.
bekkilyn
(454 posts)chwaliszewski
(1,514 posts)frazzled
(18,402 posts)Recycling 1920s Eugene Debs and early 1970s political bromides definitely did not work.
So why is he giving advice like he has the answers?
delisen
(6,042 posts)I think his ego was speaking, which seems to be bigger than the Democratic party and makes it difficult for him to squeeze it inside the Tent.
BeyondGeography
(39,351 posts)A fine title for the one-dimensional speech that Bernie always gives.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)need to be condescendingly advised to avoid "same-old, same old"?
Hekate
(90,562 posts)redgreenandblue
(2,088 posts)Since when does a son of Jewish immigrants who lost family in the Holocaust need to be in awe because somebody, yikes, had to work in college?
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)working class and young people into to the party.
Sanctimonious doesn't even begin to cover it.
Rex
(65,616 posts)There has been a continuation from the fallout of Trump winning and none of it is good. Everyone and their dog are paying attention now.
I get people telling me to stop complaining and accept the orange gelatinous grift weasel. I tend to block them.
Rex
(65,616 posts)I am down to one relative and I cannot block them they live next door.
murielm99
(30,717 posts)And what does he mean that he looks forward to working with with Perez? Sanders is not a Democrat.
delisen
(6,042 posts)mcar
(42,278 posts)A man who has a brilliant record of fighting for working men and women. A simple congratulations would have sufficed - and showed some class.
George II
(67,782 posts)democratisphere
(17,235 posts)Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)liquid diamond
(1,917 posts)thread haven't been hidden for daring to tell St. Bernie to shut up.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)Maven
(10,533 posts)BannonsLiver
(16,313 posts)Maven
(10,533 posts)of Bernie putting down the Democratic Party while simultaneously purporting to be its savior and at the same time being too good to join it officially.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,757 posts)Why doesn't he join the Democratic party? If not please shut the hell up.
ciaobaby
(1,000 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,757 posts)But thank you for playing. Please keep that "woe is me" game out of the discussion.
SharonClark
(10,014 posts)ciaobaby
(1,000 posts)It is because he is not technically a Democrat.
So all you Bernie haters should be thankful he remains independent.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)#NotABernieHaterHere
Hekate
(90,562 posts)...of a pattern with Bernie.
It is not "continually berating" him to call him out on his words and attitude, especially as he repeats the same pattern continually over the years.
He thinks he's right -- fine. But usually people want to debate an issue, not be lectured on how wrong they are or how they don't measure up to someone else's ideal.
Bernie lectures and condescends. We are within our rights to point that out.
Buddyblazon
(3,014 posts)non stop.
Tell me how that's working out for you.
uponit7771
(90,304 posts)Buddyblazon
(3,014 posts)helping them fundraise. He pulled 7000 people.
Check yourself.
DURHAM D
(32,606 posts)uponit7771
(90,304 posts)uponit7771
(90,304 posts)Tatiana
(14,167 posts)Perez won. We have bigger and more important things to tackle at this point.
I don't necessarily disagree with Sanders. Our party needs to move in a different direction. But I think Perez understands that, and that's why he asked for Ellison to be his Deputy.
Right now the house is on fire. We have to prioritize and mobilize to put out the fire. It's all hands on deck.
This type of rhetoric isn't helpful.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)and be gracious on this occasion instead of lecturing the damn man...especially since he hasn't won anything beyond Vermont and wasn't all that helpful in getting winning candidates into office.
He's just being a drama queen because can and his "used by" date has pretty much expired.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Because I think I know.
Buddyblazon
(3,014 posts)Democrats just put up the same old type of politician presented to the American people for decades...
And the democrats chosen candidate lost to an absolute fucking idiot.
Keep plodding down the same path. Just don't be an asshole when you keep getting the same result:
Losing.
JI7
(89,241 posts)unlike Obama . and Perez is an Obama guy.
Buddyblazon
(3,014 posts)People that were shocked by this really weren't paying attention.
JI7
(89,241 posts)and the end of voting rights act which whicht he supreme court struck down.
these things matter .
Response to JI7 (Reply #160)
Post removed
JI7
(89,241 posts)by some dnc guy saying something in an email there is no way he would be able to deal with a national ge campaign.
Buddyblazon
(3,014 posts)They obviously fired DWS because all that shit was made up.
Welp...some people won't quit bashing their heads into the wall. Best I can do is offer you a helmet.
JI7
(89,241 posts)he could deal with a national campaign.
Response to JI7 (Reply #164)
Post removed
JI7
(89,241 posts)And Obama beat Hillary under the same system.
Buddyblazon
(3,014 posts)is what Trump enablers say.
JI7
(89,241 posts)Buddyblazon
(3,014 posts)After remaining silent on DNC interference.
You don't get to be a hypocrite like that AND not expect people to call you on your double standards. lol
JI7
(89,241 posts)Is about some email of someone complaining after sanders already lost.
And complaining about a system in place for years .
Okay. If you're going to revise history...yes you deserve the misery. Folks were screaming about the collusion from the very beginning of the primaries. Not just because of some email after it was over.
JI7
(89,241 posts)Just because they scream doesnt make it true.
Response to JI7 (Reply #174)
Post removed
JI7
(89,241 posts)Buddyblazon
(3,014 posts)I own a cannabis business in a rec state. Its
Awesome when people like me who actually fought tooth and nail for years for the stuff you take for granted, now possibly having to have my business shuttered, my house and finances seized and face serious jail time...have to listen to people like you tell me I'm a Trump supporter.
I held my nose and voted for your candidate as you were screaming at me...telling me you didn't need my vote...how awful I was for not falling into line (regardless of the fact that she was vague on cannabis policy)...
And then upon here humiliating defeat...after doing exactly as you demanded we do...turning around and screaming it was all our fault she lost.
She lost because she was the same old same old. She lost because she couldn't get a single
Republican to cross over. She lost because her ardent supporters like yourself alienated the shit out of fellow liberals/progressives that didn't fall in line.
No...you deserve to feel the fucking anxiety that I and my fellow industry compadres are about to feel after we warned you what would happen if you put her forth as a candidate.
You? You get to sit behind your computer screen and revise history.
I do indeed hope you get to feel the anxiety that we in the cannabis industry are going to feel for the foreseeable future because of the shit candidate you lambasted us into supporting.
May a whale bequeath itself on your favorite rug.
JI7
(89,241 posts)Response to JI7 (Reply #179)
Post removed
Response to Post removed (Reply #180)
JTFrog This message was self-deleted by its author.
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)but that story about DNC collusion was the product of Russian propaganda by which emails were planted with the dates changed in order to sow division within the Democratic Party and thereby help Trump get elected. As we can see, it worked.
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)No one has confirmed the accuracy of the hacked and potentially altered propaganda material from russian intelligence
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)or omitted to create a false impression.
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)seaglass
(8,171 posts)Perez and Ellison can figure this out without Bernie's non-original input.
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)Blue_Adept
(6,393 posts)The post-Trump election is a very different electorate than what we had during the primaries and the end race itself.
uponit7771
(90,304 posts)Mike Nelson
(9,944 posts)...Bernie being old does not bother me. He's our elder statesman, now! I trust he will help Perez and Ellison with support and advice! Let's move forward - stronger together!
brutus smith
(685 posts)What did Hillary do for a 50 state strategy? I can speak for my state of Ohio that she galvanized people who were against her. There was no enthusiasm for her here. Howard Dean had it right back then about the 50 state strategy. Start at the local, then the state, then Washington. Quit the f@cking bickering. People who DO vote, don't like it.
GoCubsGo
(32,075 posts)"No shit, Sherlock!"
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Proud Liberal Dem
(24,396 posts)seems in bad form/taste. Republicans don't do this with theirs, do they?
This is pretty much why I didn't support/vote for Bernie in the primaries.
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)WTF?? Who the hell is Sanders to lecture Tom Perez on how to do his job. Tom is an intelligent, accomplished liberal (okay, "progressive" if you hate the word "liberal" . He doesn't need Bernie Sanders to wag his finger and tell him what he has the understand. Sanders, as usual, insists on his way or the highway. The DNC Chair may have other plans and need not listen to a non-Democrat on how to run the Democratic Party.
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)Lecturing Tom Perez is not a good move
cadmium
(1,526 posts)Bernie is being condescending of it just sounds that way in transcription. "Same-old, Same old" is not working and I'll give him the benefit of the doubt that he is not suggesting that Tom is "same old-same old". That would be silly since Bernie has been in Congress more then 25 yrs himself. I mostly don't like to see these comments out of context-possibly twisted by a reporter trying to stir up dissent.
If he knows Tom Perez, he knows he is a dynamo.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz was a fresh face and a dynamo, but was just not right for the job. So, time will tell.