Team Trump Is Launching a Frontal Assault on the EPA

[n2doc]

By Ed Kilgore

Anyone laboring under the impression that the new Trump administration will be all bark and no bite when it comes to overturning long-established bipartisan policies should watch Team Trump’s assault on the Environmental Protection Agency closely. Aside from appointing Scott Pruitt, who is mainly familiar with EPA as a hated adversary in court, to be in charge of that agency, plans for an initial regulatory wave and budgetary policies amount to a 180-degree turn in environmental enforcement, as reported today by Axios. They include the complete elimination of climate-change programs; a half-billion-dollars in funding cuts for EPA grants to state and local governments; an immediate halt to Clean Air Act regulations affecting new and existing power plants; an about-face on auto emissions standards; and a general defanging of EPA’s crucial ability to overrule federal and state regulations that pose environmental dangers.

That’s probably just the beginning, because these plans were formulated by Trump’s EPA transition director, Myron Ebell, mostly famous as a climate-change skeptic, but more generally active as a policy wonk at a very prominent libertarian-ish think tank called the Competitive Enterprise Institute, financed mostly by a rogue’s gallery of fossil-fuel industries and right-wing foundations.

more
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/01/team-trump-is-launching-a-frontal-assault-on-the-epa.html

[underpants]

1. At this point I'm not convinced they can correctly spell EPA

The cake was fake. Not just a stolen design. The cake wasn't made to be eaten

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=8522004

[Doreen]

2. I say this to those who understand what I mean.

Get ready to welcome back "the aroma of Tacoma" because those are about to come back with dictator Trump.

[JudyM]

3. We need a green issues march as big as the women's march.

[geek tragedy]

4. it will be tougher than they think to scrap regulations.

Regs that have gone through the notice and comment process before being finalized can't just be dumped "because we say so." Especially if there's a long record of science indicating the need for such measures.

Bush didn't keep much of Clinton's work out of the goodness of his heart.

[n2doc]

5. No, but it will be much easier to defund enforcement. n/t