Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Could someone on probation head a major Department in the United States? (Original Post) malaise Nov 2016 OP
In the new fourth reich, anything is acceptable. Heir Drumpf has eliminated, with the help of the mfcorey1 Nov 2016 #1
Doesn't SOS need a security clearance? greymattermom Nov 2016 #2
It seems like all rules are out with Trump. MineralMan Nov 2016 #3
Effin' crazy brother malaise Nov 2016 #4
It has seemed regularly to me that Trump is MineralMan Nov 2016 #5
You mean Emperor Groper Don the Con malaise Nov 2016 #6
Agreed - I think it's completely intentional. TwilightZone Nov 2016 #8
Wow I'm amazed by the Chutzpah here Proud Liberal Dem Nov 2016 #7
And who is still on probation for a fucking crime n/t malaise Nov 2016 #9

mfcorey1

(11,001 posts)
1. In the new fourth reich, anything is acceptable. Heir Drumpf has eliminated, with the help of the
Tue Nov 29, 2016, 06:15 AM
Nov 2016

media, all rules! WE ARE DOOMED!

greymattermom

(5,751 posts)
2. Doesn't SOS need a security clearance?
Tue Nov 29, 2016, 06:25 AM
Nov 2016

and can he get one? Can the President give a security clearance to someone who is rejected?

MineralMan

(146,262 posts)
3. It seems like all rules are out with Trump.
Tue Nov 29, 2016, 10:29 AM
Nov 2016

That a man who is still on probation for giving classified information to someone not authorized is up for any high government office is literally incredible to me. Secretary of State? Director of National Intelligence? On what planet does Donald Trump live? He is making an absolute mockery of the Cabinet.

MineralMan

(146,262 posts)
5. It has seemed regularly to me that Trump is
Tue Nov 29, 2016, 10:49 AM
Nov 2016

pushing his thumb into the eye of this country repeatedly and deliberately with his Cabinet picks. Each and every one seems completely inappropriate to me. And not just mildly, but blatantly inappropriate.

The Petraeus option is so clearly the wrong move that it must be designed to mock the very nature of the positions for which he is being considered. I'm gobsmacked by all of this. It is surrealistic.

TwilightZone

(25,430 posts)
8. Agreed - I think it's completely intentional.
Tue Nov 29, 2016, 11:10 AM
Nov 2016

I think he's intentionally picking the worst candidate he can come up with for each position. Why is anyone's guess.

I thought that Ben Carson for HUD was going to be the most egregious example, but I think Petraeus tops that.

Edit: the Tom Price pick is probably equally egregious, if not more so.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,396 posts)
7. Wow I'm amazed by the Chutzpah here
Tue Nov 29, 2016, 11:05 AM
Nov 2016

Given that Trump and Republicans and the Media spent obscene amounts of time trashing Hillary over her private e-mail server (which never actually compromised any classified information) and now they want to nominate somebody who INTENTIONALLY compromised classified information? What in the ever living f**k?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Could someone on probatio...