Where's Jose?

[packman]

[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]

I see a lot of hats, a bald white guy, a lot of white guys, poorly written signs - but, where is the Latinos?


NOTE: Picture taken right after same group held up signs saying "Blacks for Trump" (sarcasm folks, sarcasm)

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

1. No Latinas, I guess.

And the word in that context should be por, not para. But since there are no Latinos/Latinas in that campaign, nobody there would notice the error.

[jehop61]

3. Ha you are correct

First thing I thought. These guys take the American people for idiots.

[Wounded Bear]

12. Well, their base are idiots, mostly...

[liberal N proud]

2. Similar to the Republican Interns pictured with Paul Ryan.

[pinboy3niner]

4. The fallacy of judging heritage by appearance

I have some very "white-looking" friends who are of Mexican heritage. These friends are Liberal Democrats, btw.

[misterhighwasted]

5. That's right. When they turn their signs around it reads..

"Blacks for Trump"

Next photo op will be "Women for Trump" printed on one side and "LGBTQ for Trump" on the reverse.

Same group of people holding the "....for Trump" signage however.
Just how reality works for TrumpTV.

[sarae]

8. lol!

I wouldn't be surprised...and Donald brags constantly about being the candidate who doesn't pander.

uh huh, SURE.

[misterhighwasted]

9. He didn't finish the sentence....

"..the candidate who doesn't pander"....
When he's asleep?
When he's in a coma?

[sarae]

19. Right?

Trump saying he doesn't pander is so laughable...

[notadmblnd]

6. How are Latinos and Latinas supposed to look?

[pinboy3niner]

7. Like the Frito Bandito and Chiquita Banana, obviously

[misterhighwasted]

11. LoL.. that is sadly true of Donald's kkk base.

[WillowTree]

10. Between "Where's Jose?" and.......

........and the apparent assumption that all Latinos are dark skinned with big ol' mustaches, I'm more than a little shocked that I'm seeing this on DU. Really.

[Wounded Bear]

13. As commentary on how the Trump campaign handles race...

I would allow it.

[WillowTree]

21. Doesn't make it any less offensive. And I'm not all that easily offended, as some here have noticed

Where's Jose???

[notadmblnd]

15. I'm right there with you

I've been given the impression that all of DU had evolved to a higher plane when it comes to bigotry. Guess not, huh?

Color me fooled once again.

[kiva]

16. But that's how all Latinos look, right?

It's OK for us to generalize because our racial stereotypes are meant as a good thing

[packman]

17. Oh, gimme a break

REALLY - No, I expected some sombreros, ponchos, a few eating tacos and some one having a sign saying, "We don't need no stinkin' badges". Put your hypersensitivity into neutral.

[kiva]

18. So if you had said

"Where's DeShawn?" and pointed out that no one in the picture was black enough, it would be OK?

[packman]

22. It depends - are they eating ribs and chicken?

We can keep this going all day - I think you are hitting the sensitivity button too hard, and I really don't care for your hyper-cultural awareness which when carried to that degree is just being ridiculous. Besides, everyone knows Deshawn wouldn't be at the RNC anyway. What is "black enough" anyway? Midnight black, creamy chocolate black, lite amber black - you really need to sharpen up that stick if you are going to poke it into every perceived slight.

No more from me on your ethnic/culture problems

[pinboy3niner]

20. Judging from a photo is based on stereotypical assumptions

That's the problem.

[The_Casual_Observer]

14. Gogo para presidente

[UTUSN]

23. R#3 & K for, their great-granddads were who stole land from & murdered "Latinos"