The Panama Papers expose the hypocrisy of England’s oligarchs
Cuts for the Poor, Tax Havens for the Rich
The Panama Papers expose the hypocrisy of Englands oligarchs.
(
In These Times) In 1960, when we moved into the house I still inhabit, the real estate agent described this part of Chelsea as run-down but coming up. Indeed, my mother-in-law, whod just stopped being a stalwart Communist, congratulated her son on living at last among his own people. Shed lived in our street briefly in the 1930s and remembered it as working class. Nowadays, the news that I live in Chelsea occasions whistles of surprise or disapproval or possibly envy. Its where rich people live.
Yet until a month ago, there were five men sleeping on the ground under an overhanging concrete shelf by the local fire station, which is exposed to the elements and the unfriendly. I took them to be refugees, as they didnt speak much English. Presumably those who sometimes left croissants and bananas and occasionally books thought the same. Now theyve been evicted and their temporary sanctuary made impenetrable by the erection of a nasty green steel barrier. They are just some of the thousands and thousands of people who are told these days theyre not wanted, that they should return to homes that no longer exist, should expose themselves and their families if necessary to drowning and bombs, and to poverty and starvation.
A famous 19th-century institution, the Charity Organisation Society (which spread to the United States later in the century), saw its primary duty as distinguishing between the deserving and the undeserving poor. We appear to be returning to those times, as the state disowns responsibility for suffering or poverty and spends longer sifting the sheep from the goats than on confronting the causes and the extent of poverty in the world.
All that may seem miles from the so-called Panama Papers and the embarrassment theyve caused our prime minister, David Cameron, when they revealed that his father ran a tax-avoiding investment fund in one of the treasure islands (otherwise known as tax havens) that now constitute whats left of the great British Empire. Not surprisingly, Cameron turns out to have benefited from his fathers foresight, though its not clear that either father or son acted unlawfully. But Cameron refused four times to come clean about it all, and when he finally admitted to his party colleagues that it had been a bad week and he was sorry if hed misled them and handled it all badly, his mea culpa ended with assurances that the Conservatives were still the low tax party, which is what matters most to them all. ..............(more)
http://inthesetimes.com/article/19102/panama-papers-reveal-david-camerons-priorities