General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOne of the most heatbreaking pictures I've seen. From National Wildlife Federation.
The pain shows so clearly in the mother's face. She's mourning the death of her cub and is being comforted by another.
http://blog.nwf.org/2012/03/wildlife-photos-well-never-forget/
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)would they get banned for it?
good pic
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)And it sure comes across in that picture, doesn't it?
Life is hard on this planet Earth. Always has been, always will be. And the ground everywhere is drenched with the tears of mothers of all kinds.
PB
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)there's others who aren't so cool and they might not see the above..
more power to you
Merlot
(9,696 posts)For example, a lot of christians think the earth is to be used for their own benefit, and animals are there to be used for the good of man. And those who believe the world will end so why bother with conservation.
No need to make the atheist dig on this topic.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Withywindle
(9,988 posts)You don't have to believe in God or anything supernatural to have empathy for others' pain. Emotions are real to the one feeling them, no matter what, and loss of a loved one is something we can all relate to, a sorrow we all will share in. To think that only humans have such basic and powerful feelings as love, grief, etc. is the height of arrogance. (And frankly, I find the insistence in some sects of Christianity that only humans matter because only humans have "souls" to be the absolute height of that kind of cold, self-aggrandizing ruthless pride.)
sinkingfeeling
(51,444 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)EC
(12,287 posts)too dependent on me for his happiness. He is so attached to me, my bil once said my dog is like my Siamese twin...attached to me....he's always at my side. It makes me sad that he may be this dog in the picture if anything happened to me. I don't know how to change that possibility.
The picture is sad and yet heartwarming. To see such maternal love in an animal.
pasto76
(1,589 posts)thats a huge chunk of hominid history. They _know_ us. Sometimes better than we do. They are not pack animals, but they are social animals. Their physiology makes them pretty interesting companions and I have learned from them most of my life.
check out this book http://insideofadog.com/. Really, really interesting stuff in there.
Actually, I remember all the dogs in the neighborhood roaming around together and then they had a fight with my dog one night...
Seem like pack animals to me. Just depends on if they get together with no leashes I guess.
fasttense
(17,301 posts)I hope it includes all my pets.
TBF
(32,047 posts)I try to vary my coming & going, don't make a fuss of her, and I usually am the one in my family to turn in early while they are all still up hanging out together (husband, kids, dogs) ... I'm hoping if I keep it up it will make her less reliant on me - we have only had her 2 months. But I am the one home with the dogs all day while everyone else is at work/school so they tend to be by my side when I'm around.
I do believe animals are sentient beings and the photos in this thread certainly back up that idea.
Swede Atlanta
(3,596 posts)Response to sinkingfeeling (Original post)
amb123 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Edim
(300 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)I actually painted a mother and baby snuggling up together and gave it to my Granddaughter. Hopefully stimulating her to love of these great/beautiful bears.
I hope her generation gets to see them. I also sent her a series of books on polar bears. She loved them.
lillypaddle
(9,580 posts)says it all.
flvegan
(64,407 posts)Just something to think about. That is truly a heartbreaking picture.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)zoechen
(93 posts)[img] [/img]
I guess they ain't people after all.
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)fuck ... I don't know ... something?
Merlot
(9,696 posts)You're applying human standards to animals...it can't be grief because the animal did something unacceptable to humans?
zoechen
(93 posts)You've got it bass ackwards.
I am not applying human standards to anything, what I am doing is pointing out the folly of applying human standards to animals.
Oh, btw, that ain't a human carcess in case you didn't notice.
Withywindle
(9,988 posts)Most (not all) humans (in most societies currently existing, not universal historically) have a taboo against cannibalism (but we'll do it if we have to).
But it's OK for us to kill each other as long as we make sure that the meat goes to waste. And since we kill each other all the time, obviously we don't REALLY grieve for the deaths of our specific loved ones.
zoechen
(93 posts)Withywindle
25. Oh, but humans would never ever kill each other, would we?
Most (not all) humans (in most societies currently existing, not universal historically) have a taboo against cannibalism (but we'll do it if we have to).
But it's OK for us to kill each other as long as we make sure that the meat goes to waste. And since we kill each other all the time, obviously we don't REALLY grieve for the deaths of our specific loved ones.
End quote...
I'm having trouble understanding this post.
I've even turned the tv off so that I could concentrate...
It didn't help. could I get a little help here?
Withywindle
(9,988 posts)A picture of a polar bear killing and eating another polar bear tells us exactly zilch about what emotions they do or don't feel towards each other.
There are countless gruesome photos available of horrible things humans do to each other. I don't think anyone would argue that that in itself proves that humans have no capacity to love or grieve, right?
Merlot
(9,696 posts)I understood your post about the "folly of applying human standards to animals" but you have done exactly that by assuming it can't be grief if the polar bear would then eat the carcass of it's young.
Because a person who is grieving wouldn't eat the carcass, therefore an animal can't feel grief because it then eats the young?
Possibly the animal can feel grief, and then proceed to do what nature intends.
Oh, no, two conflicting thoughts at the same time...
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)your post is just downright disgusting and radically off-topic. Either that, or your remarks come from a tragically misinformed viewpoint.
It's not the picture that's the problem (well, it will be a problem to many DU readers here, for good reason); it's the spirit in which it was posted.
Please self-delete that.
fasttense
(17,301 posts)Yes, polar bears will eat their dead. Male polar bears are likely to hunt down cubs if they are hungry enough.
And animal mothers are known to eat their dead offspring. That offspring represents a lot of energy and resources that would go to waste if the mother let it simply rot away.
It does not make the grief nonexistence. Did you ever wonder what instincts feel like? I think instincts feel like emotions feel. So I do not believe animals do NOT feel emotions. They just don't remember them as long as humans do.
I once saw a nature show were a mother lion hunted and called for her dead cub for weeks. She eventually died because she would spend all day looking for her long dead cub and did nothing else. It was instinct that drove her to search for her cub. But how do you know that her instinct did NOT feel like emotions feel to humans?
I think humans, especially those who have not been around animals much, overrate their own emotions as if they are somehow special and unique to humans only. Animals do feel emotions, what's so special about that?