General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsShould it have been 'Black Lives Matter Too'?
I was just wondering since a lot of people don't get it with the original cause...I was one of them. Now I understand but others aren't getting the explanation of it or at least seeking it out. What do you all think?
marym625
(17,997 posts)antiquie
(4,299 posts)gwheezie
(3,580 posts)Black lives matter means exactly that, it's not a comment on the value of other races.
Igel
(35,382 posts)Some are more important than others.
One has to decide if intent or interpretation are more important. And then be consistent.
johnp3907
(3,734 posts)"Black Lives Matter" is fine.
Lilith Rising
(184 posts)Seems pretty straight forward to me.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)craigmatic
(4,510 posts)As if you're saying oh please we see other people's lives matter please accept the fact that our lives also matter. All that's not necessary Black Lives Matter is just a statement of fact just like gays have Pride it's not to knock other people it's just that you're trying to represent your own.
JustinL
(722 posts)"Fight Cancer Too. Save Additional Lives."
"Support our Troops Too."
If not, what's the difference between "Black Lives Matter" and those other slogans?
bvf
(6,604 posts)You came to understand it. Others will too.
Diluting the phrase would strip it of any meaning. It would be the equivalent of "all lives matter." Not the message.
Euphoria
(448 posts)no more hand-holding (which hasn't helped anyway).
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)That the name and the movement arose from and by the black community. Our role as allies is to be supportive in every sense of the word.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)marble falls
(57,397 posts)Delmette
(522 posts)No, No and No.