Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnytime you wonder why labor unions declined in America, its simple: Taft-Hartley Act of 1947
The Republican dominated Congress in 1947 passed with a veto-proof majority, the Taft Hartley Act, which is highlighted in this article:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/the_great_divergence/features/2010/the_united_states_of_inequality/the_great_divergence_and_the_death_of_organized_labor.html
Levy and Temin don't dwell on this, but in his 1991 book Which Side Are You On?: Trying To Be For Labor When It's Flat On Its Back,Thomas Geoghegan, a Chicago-based labor lawyer, argues that Taft-Hartley was the principal cause of the American labor movement's eventual steep decline:
First, it ended organizing on the grand, 1930s scale. It outlawed mass picketing, secondary strikes of neutral employers, sit downs: in short, everything [Congress of Industrial Organizations founder John L.] Lewis did in the 1930s.
It also allowed and even encouraged employers to threaten workers who want to organize. Employers could hold "captive meetings," bring workers into the office and chew them out for thinking about the Union.
Read the full article because there were more paragraphs that I would have liked to fit in this and are worth reading. Taft Hartley gave the tools employers and other labor enemies needed to bring down labor unions. Europe never had this, and this is why labor unions remain relatively strong in Europe.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1247 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (25)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anytime you wonder why labor unions declined in America, its simple: Taft-Hartley Act of 1947 (Original Post)
AZ Progressive
Jul 2015
OP
otherone
(973 posts)1. Which Side Are You On?: Trying To Be For Labor When It's Flat On Its Back
This is a great little book.
I was reading it when I met my wife..
pampango
(24,692 posts)2. Not only "passed with a veto-proof majority"; Truman vetoed it then the "Republican dominated
Congress" passed it over his veto.
You are right. Unions cannot regain the health they had under FDR, or the relative health they now have in Europe and other developed countries, with Taft-Hartley restrictions, including 'right-to-work' laws, in effect.
mountain grammy
(26,661 posts)4. Very good book. I read it while I was a union steward
and my employer was actively engaged in union busting. They finally succeeded, three years after I quit.