Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEx-Intel Chief: Iran Deal Good for Israel
Jonathan AlterYes, its true: If Obama can toughen the penalties for cheating and pivot to confronting Irans support for terrorism, he will enhance Israel's security.
-snip-
I spoke recently with Ami Ayalon, a former head of Shin Bet, the Israeli internal security service, and a former chief of the Israeli Navy. Even as he explained that the issue "is not black and white," he reeled off a list of former defense ministers and chiefs of Shin Bet and Mossad who agree with him that, "when it comes to Iran's nuclear capability, this [deal] is the best option."
"When negotiations began, Iran was two months away from acquiring enough material for a [nuclear] bomb. Now it will be 12 months," Ayalon says, and the difference is significant to anyone with a background in intelligence. "Israelis are failing to distinguish between reducing Iran's nuclear capability and Iran being the biggest devil in the Middle East," he says.
Why has the response been more emotional than logical? "It's very easy to play with fears in a fearful society, he says.
For a country that usually has a sure sense of its own security interests, Israel can be strangely obtuse about the true existential threats it faces. Many Israelis and American Jews resent Jimmy Carter for his strong views opposing the occupation of Palestinian territories and his use of the word "apartheid" to describe the situation there. They rarely recognize that by engineering the Camp David Accords, Carter removed the existential threat posed by the Egyptian army, the only force capable of driving Israel into the sea.
Now they dislike President Obama for striking a deal that, at a minimum, delays Iran's ability to destroy Israel with a nuclear bomb.
Ayalon and several of the other Israeli war heroes who appeared in The Gatekeepers, an acclaimed 2012 documentary about Shin Bet, endorse Obamas best argument for the agreement -- that the alternative is much worse.
more
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/07/21/ex-intel-chief-iran-deal-good-for-israel.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 499 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ex-Intel Chief: Iran Deal Good for Israel (Original Post)
DonViejo
Jul 2015
OP
This deal is bad for Bibi and anyone else who wants to start war against Iran
NightWatcher
Jul 2015
#1
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)1. This deal is bad for Bibi and anyone else who wants to start war against Iran
So unless you make your money off of war, this is a good deal for you.
Bibi is some type of demon who wants us to be pulled into a war that he cannot win (nor could we, I'm afraid).
annabanana
(52,791 posts)2. I wish this vital info could PUSH INTO
the national discourse.
BiBi and his war party are NOT the whole of Israel.
see here:
https://jewishvoiceforpeace.org/blog/jewish-peace-advocates-support-iran-nuclear-deal